5 measurements spanning 9 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,912–5,946 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 17:54
5,942
+6
13 Aug 2026, 13:16
5,936
+10
10 Aug 2026, 09:41
5,926
+10
7 Aug 2026, 19:50
5,916
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:33
5,916
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 5,942 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,330
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
12 (17 July 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
14,600
Reactions total
731
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9m 17s
Average length
4m 39s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
759 reactions across 11 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
239
31.5%
🔥
170
22.4%
💯
146
19.2%
🥰
74
9.75%
😱
24
3.16%
💘
21
2.77%
😢
18
2.37%
👏
13
1.71%
❤🔥
10
1.32%
🍓
8
1.05%
🐳
8
1.05%
😁
8
1.05%
🤯
7
0.922%
🎉
5
0.659%
😭
5
0.659%
💔
2
0.264%
👍
1
0.132%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 759reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 12 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rumiiateacher. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🙂↕️48 новых слов на одной странице
🙂↕️отсутствие задание на практику
🙂↕️несколько новых тем на одном развороте
Я уверена, что вы сталкивались с такими проблемами даже в самых лучших учебниках.
Поэтому записала для вас 2 видео, где на примере учебников разбираю проблемы разных этапов урока.
А самое главное: даю практические рекомендации по решению этих проблем.
Видео построены по схеме:
учебник ➡️ проблема ➡️ реш…
Этим летом у меня появилась классная возможность увидеть результат работы очень быстро.
Да, вы уже правильно догадались. Я говорю о своем летнем интенсиве.
Обычно, когда ученики приходят с нуля и мы занимаемся в течение года, прогресс бывает сложно почувствовать.
Он однозначно есть. Но уроки растянуты на весь учебный год, поэтому иногда мы просто забываем, с чего начинали.
Сейчас мои девочки занимаются 4-5 раз в не…
В этом году я расформировала группу.
Так получилось, что дальше группа уже не сможет заниматься вместе, так как у нас появились расхождения в интересах и уровне.
🚩В этой группе учился Кирилл — один из моих первых учеников, который пришел ко мне, когда я перешла в онлайн в 2019 году.
Его мама нашла меня на Профи.
За 7 лет с нуля мы достигли уровня B1+.
Могли ли достичь большего?
Могли, но пубертат дал знать о себе и…
В среду мы с мужем ездили на ТО машины.
Вот уже два года я — водитель! 😎
Пока мой максимум: поездка из Татарстана в Грузию (Батуми) на машине.
Моя мечта: путешествие во Владивосток на машине.
И в среду у нас с Наилем был разговор:
Р: Вау, я уже два года за рулём!
Н: Да!
Р: Классно, что два года без особых происшествий и ДТП
И уже вечером после прогулки нас ждал сюрприз ⤵️
Ура!!!!
Весной в своем ТГ-канале преодолела цифру, к которой шла очень долго — с 2021 года 🥹
Теперь, когда на канале 5800 человек, можно смело праздновать.
5 лет активного ведения Телеграм-канала и вот я вижу заветную цифру — 5.000 прекрасных читателей на канале RumiiaTeacher 😭
Этот канал застал мой путь от ноунейм репетитора до эксперта, про которого знают в ELT-сфере.
Спасибо вам, мои дорогие читатели! ❤️
Вы в…
Буду хвастаться!
Помните наш летний интенсив с девочками?
Уверенно идем к стабильному A1.
Начиная с прошлой недели оставляю девочек работать без меня.
И что вы видим?
✅ Работают сообща.
✅ Стараются не переходить на русский.
✅ Подсказывают друг другу.
✅ Активно реагируют.
✅ Распредяют роли: кто добавляет фотографии на доску.
Над чем стоить работать?
📌 "Чистить" речь.
Но это неизбежный процесс. Слушаем ➡️ делаем …
Ой, как я вас понимаю: сейчас тоже строю уроки с нуля, ученица А1, но не сформированный и у нас всего 9 занятий 🤦♀🙈 но что есть, то есть. Поэтому признаюсь честно: спасибо вам, Румия, за Plan and Teach, а также за ваши лайфкаки, посты с многочисленной бесплатной (!!!) пользой, поскольку сейчас мне это легче даётся. При планировании уже открываю ваши презентации с курса и прям по ним работаю. Это мои настольные книги…
Стоп, мне неприятно!
— нужно сказать создателям учебника, когда вы видите в нем проблему.
Но паниковать точно не стоит.
Идеальных учебников не существует, но у меня для вас хорошая новость💃
Можно из страничек учебника делать прекрасные уроки.
💡Видите проблему и сразу применяете решение.
Именно про такие решения мое новое видео:
Почему ученики не усваивают материал — даже по хорошему учебнику
🔗Смотреть видео на Ю…
📌День нытья
Объявляю сегодняшний день — днем, когда можно смело жаловаться на учебники.
Что не так с учебниками?
Я не демонизирую учебники, хоть и делаю разборы, где могу полностью перекроить страничку 🤭
Сейчас для своих девочек на интенсиве я строю уроки с нуля и это очень энерго- и времязатратно.
Если нет временных рамок и какого-то специфического запроса, то работа по хорошему учебнику - это просто роскошно.
Но…
Ученики не запоминают грамматику и лексику
Да, ученики разные, и все прикладывают разное количество усилий. Но я могу с уверенностью сказать:
хорошо продуманные уроки дают больше даже ученикам, которым язык даётся сложнее
На своем втором методическом канале я выложила большой полезный разбор урока по лексике: со всеми этапами и описаниями.
➡️ Посмотреть урок
Что изменится, если перестать просто «проходить» граммат…
❤13🔥10🐳3🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @rumiiateacher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 33,855 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RumiiaTeacher: Teach English Online” (@rumiiateacher), 5,942 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rumiiateacher.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
