Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for rug.tech

Channel

rug.tech

@rug_tech

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

99subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002157990648
TypeChannel
Username@rug_tech
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 25 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rug_tech

Growth

991031017 August 2026 — 103 subscribers9 August 2026 — 103 subscribers23 August 2026 — 99 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 16 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 98–104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 19:0799-4
9 Aug 2026, 09:32103no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:59103first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 25 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 34s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2524.3%
👍1413.6%
😁1211.7%
🔥109.71%
🤣98.74%
🙈87.77%
👌54.85%
❤‍🔥32.91%
😢32.91%
🥰32.91%
🦄32.91%
😈21.94%
😐21.94%
🙏21.94%
💅10.971%
🤯10.971%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2024 to 1 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Nov 2024, 12:19 UTC248 viewsread 9 August 2026

В общем я кикнул всех админов и восккрешаю RK TRADE как og криптоканал https://t.me/RKtrade01 Здесь так будет для души мысли на рандомные темы, а все криптанство там

9 Oct 2024, 23:48 UTC337 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Завтра норм пост на тему сделаю 🫡

3

9 Oct 2024, 23:47 UTC303 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥2

13 Sept 2024, 12:05 UTC212 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Так ниггас, надо обратную связь про что интересней читать

  1. Запуски щитков, раги, фермы и тд45%
  2. Лудка на щитках, как х0 поменьше раз делать55%
  3. Не про крипту0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1👍1🔥1

13 Sept 2024, 11:47 UTC201 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Welcome to Mumbai, sir🇮🇳 https://sunpump.meme/token/TWBd8p1whGfA9eXLYRmLjDus3XkNSbADtg Тупейший фарм на санпампе, чел просто закупает свой щиток на 70к трона, ждет пару залетных покупок и рагает. Даже если ты очень тупой, всегда найдутся тупее😮‍💨 Но на троне объем высох, потуги Сана вернуть хайп чейну пока результатов не дали, так что прокормить деревню таким способом сложно.

2😁1🙏1

12 Sept 2024, 10:24 UTC198 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Начну оправдывать название канала😳 Думаю все, кто в рынке, заметили золотые тикеры на дексскринере. Чего в них такого, чтоб платить 4к$ просто чтоб перекрасить тикер своего щитка, который все равно вряд ли больше суток проживет? Во-первых, буст дает мультипликатор для попадания в топ, пока твой щиток не золотой #1 теперь получить ультрасложно. Во-вторых внимание - дегены которые сутками сидят на скринере явно обращ

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rug_tech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Sept 2024, 12:05 UTCAnonymous Poll42 voters

Так ниггас, надо обратную связь про что интересней читать

  1. Запуски щитков, раги, фермы и тд45%
  2. Лудка на щитках, как х0 поменьше раз делать55%
  3. Не про крипту0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2024 to 1 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“rug.tech” (@rug_tech), 99 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rug_tech.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.