Ссылка на основной канал: https://t.me/+_L6gRXWnYPo1YjQy

Channel
Illia Rudenko | Crypto channel
@rudenko_trade
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
204subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001557771077 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rudenko_trade |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rudenko_trade |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 204 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 204 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 22
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
181 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 89 | 49.2% | |
| 👍 | 54 | 29.8% | |
| ⚡ | 20 | 11.0% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 5.52% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.66% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.552% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.552% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.552% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.552% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.552% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2023 to 19 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
L0 ecosystems. The guys from Uroboros, our friends who came to AMU are also there.
🎯 Trust Wallet and Tezos are offering a free digital collectible figurine of the McLarenF1 F1 team to everyone This Week's Canadian Grand Prix Giveaway
Market and macro ▶️ #analytics 👨🏽💻CEX cumulative monthly trading volume in May fell 27% from the previous month and posted the lowest results since October 2020. However, we saw a surge of activity in early June in connection with the SEC lawsuits. 💁🏽♂️What about the macro? ▫️Today at 15:30 Kyiv time information on CPI and Core CPI will be released. CPI forecast 4.1% - a significant decrease from the previous 4…
do you think we can fall by 15,000?
- Yes63%
- No37%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Good morning ☀️ 🪙 BTC was hard yesterday. We see that emotional volatility affects the market almost as much as economic news. BTC continues to remain in a bullish pattern, which indicates its resilience and the potential dominance of an optimistic mood. At the same time, many alts still have room to fall. This could be an indicator that we haven't bottomed yet and the alts could offer a big buying opportunity as t…
❤1👍1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥13👍1💩1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥18👎1
SHORT FTM 20х Input: according to the market (0.4716 for me) Take 1: 0.4647 Take 2: 0.4595 Take 3: 0.4502 Take 4: 0.4407 stop: 0.4940 the RM, I'm coming on 2-4% of the deposit
👍16🔥4⚡1
🔥VIP FOR HALF PRICE 👉 @rudenko111 Only 2️⃣0️⃣ members left 20/50 ✅You do not need to be a professional trader. ✅You do not need to understand technical analysis. ✅No need to lose money. When you join our VIP channel, all you have to do is follow us exactly and take profit. ACT BEFORE OTHER PEOPLE DREAM and get all the benefits of the closed VIP channel | Binance Master 💎 💵 Futures VIP channel: 1000$ - 499$ (lifet…
👍5
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥21👍3❤🔥1
(BCH SHORT Entrance: according to the market (127.88 for me) Shoulder: 25 Take 1: 126.73 Take 2: 125.71 | Take 3: 124.35 OC stop: 131.23 © Purpose: liquidity withdrawal . Obey the RM, I'm coming on 2-4% of the deposit
❤9⚡3🤔3👍2🔥1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rudenko_trade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
do you think we can fall by 15,000?
- Yes63%
- No37%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2023 to 19 August 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,155,427 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Illia Rudenko | Crypto channel” (@rudenko_trade), 204 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rudenko_trade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.