Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ʀυⲥⲕυⲋ ⲛⲉⲱⲋ

Channel

ʀυⲥⲕυⲋ ⲛⲉⲱⲋ

@ruckusnews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 27 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003994903198
TypeChannel
Username@ruckusnews
First recorded27 September 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ruckusnews

Growth

527 Sept 2026, 18:48 — 5 subscribers27 Sept 2026, 19:22 — 5 subscribers27 Sept 2026, 18:4827 Sept 2026, 19:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 19:225no change
27 Sept 2026, 18:485first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
361.0%
avg views ÷ 5 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.1
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held20 (18 September 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total361
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋866.7%
💘433.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 11:18 UTC30 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🤩 уᥴ᧘᧐ʙᥙя д᧘я ᥴ᧐юᤋ᧐ʙ: 🩷🩷ᴩᴇᴨᴏᴄᴛиᴛь ᴛᴏᴧьᴋᴏ ᴨᴏᴄᴛы ᴄ ʍᴇᴛᴋᴀʍи «#ᴄɜᴩᴨ» ʙ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴇ. 🩷🩷д᧘я ᤋᥲκ᧘ючᥱнᥙя ᥴᤋ ᥰᥙᥴᥲᴛь ʙ᧘д @literlq 🩷дᥱ᧘ᥲᥱⲙ ᥴ 0+ 🩷ʙ rᥙᴄᴋᥙs дᥱρжᥙⲙ ᴨᴏᴄᴛы ᥴ᧐юᤋнᥙκ᧐ʙ 12-24 чᴀᴄᴏʙ 🩷ʙᤋ ᥰдᥰ 1:1, 2:2, 3:3 🩷ρᥲᤋρыʙ ᥱᥴ᧘ᥙ : нᥱᥲκᴛᥙʙ ᧐ᴛᥰᥙᥴκᥲ ᤋᥲκρыᴛᥙᥱ 🩷🩷ᴄᴨиᴄᴏᴋ рп ᴄᴏюɜᴏʙ: • ɦᥙrᴛ fᥣ᧐᧐ɗ • ᥴᥣᥲrⲙi fᥣ᧐᧐ɗ • rᥱᥣigi᧐ᥒ fᥣ᧐᧐ɗ • fᥲⲙ᧐ᥙs fᥣ᧐᧐ɗ • fᥣᥲ᥊i fᥣ᧐᧐ɗ • ρᥙrᥱ ᧐ρᥙᥣᥱᥒᥴᥱ fᥣ᧐᧐ɗ • κiᴛᴛᥱᥒs fᥣ᧐᧐ɗ • sᥱᥲ ᧐f sᥲκᥙrᥲ fᥣ᧐᧐ɗ • ⲙᥲ᥎ᥱᥣ…

💘2

20 Sept 2026, 11:09 UTC23 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 ᴩᴇᴄᴛ — ϶ᴛᴏ ᴏᴨᴩᴇдᴇᴧᴇннᴏᴇ ʙᴩᴇʍᴇня, ᴋᴏᴦдᴀ учᴀᴄᴛниᴋ ʍᴏжᴇᴛ нᴇ ᴀᴋᴛиʙиᴛиᴛь, нᴏ ᴨᴀᴩᴀᴧᴧᴇᴧьнᴏ ᴏᴄᴛᴀʙᴀᴛьᴄя ʙᴏ ɸᴧудᴇ. ➿⭐➿⭐➿⭐➿⭐➿🤩 role ~ period 🩷джеймс 24/07 ~ неопределенно 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🩷винтер 15/09 ~ 14/10 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🩷хэринвонен 18/09 ~ 29/09 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🩷сынмин 25/09 ~ 09/10 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🩷джисонсигманутый 26/9 ~ 11/10 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🩷минджи 26/9 ~ неопределенно 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿

💘2

18 Sept 2026, 16:02 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 🤩🤩🤩🤩🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 🩷Вᴇдущий ᴨᴏᴋᴀɜыʙᴀᴇᴛ ɸᴏᴛᴏᴦᴩᴀɸию ᴄ ᴨᴇᴩᴄᴏнᴀжᴇʍ, ᴋᴀдᴩᴏʍ иᴧи ᴏбᴧᴏжᴋᴏй иɜ дᴏᴩᴀʍы, нᴀɜʙᴀниᴇ ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩᴏй учᴀᴄᴛниᴋи дᴏᴧжны уᴦᴀдᴀᴛь. Кᴛᴏ быᴄᴛᴩᴇᴇ ʙᴄᴇх нᴀᴨиᴄᴀᴧ ᴨᴩᴀʙиᴧьнᴏᴇ нᴀɜʙᴀниᴇ дᴏᴩᴀʍы — ᴨᴏᴧучᴀᴇᴛ бᴀᴧᴧ. 🩷🩷В ᴋᴏнцᴇ ʙᴄᴇ бᴀᴧᴧы ᴨᴏдᴄчиᴛыʙᴀюᴛᴄя и ᴏбъяʙᴧяюᴛ ᴨᴏбᴇдиᴛᴇᴧя. 🩷🩷ᴏᴛʙᴇᴛ ɜᴀщиᴛыʙᴀᴇᴛᴄя ᴛᴏᴧьᴋᴏ ᴇᴄᴧи нᴀɜʙᴀниᴇ дᴏᴩᴀʍы нᴀᴨиᴄᴀнᴏ ᴨᴩᴀʙиᴧьнᴏ. #интерактивы

💋2

18 Sept 2026, 16:02 UTC16 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 🤩🤩🤩🤩🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 🩷Вᴇдущий ᴨᴏᴋᴀɜыʙᴀᴇᴛ ϶ʍᴏдɜи, ᴏᴨиᴄыʙᴀющиᴇ ᴋᴀᴋую-ᴛᴏ ᴋ-ᴨᴏᴨ ᴨᴇᴄню или ᴋᴧиᴨ. А иᴦᴩᴏᴋи дᴏᴧжны уᴦᴀдᴀᴛь, чᴛᴏ ϶ᴛᴏ ɜᴀ ᴨᴇᴄня или ᴋᴧиᴨ. Пᴩиʍᴇᴩ: 🚔💗 — ᴄᴀsᴇ 143 (sᴋz) ➿➿➿➿ Кᴛᴏ быᴄᴛᴩᴇᴇ ʙᴄᴇх нᴀᴨиᴄᴀᴧ ᴨᴩᴀʙиᴧьный ᴏᴛʙᴇᴛ — ᴨᴏᴧучᴀᴇᴛ бᴀᴧᴧ. 🩷🩷В ᴋᴏнцᴇ ʙᴄᴇ бᴀᴧᴧы ᴨᴏдᴄчиᴛыʙᴀюᴛᴄя и ᴏбъяʙᴧяюᴛ ᴨᴏбᴇдиᴛᴇᴧя. 🩷🩷ᴏᴛʙᴇᴛ ɜᴀщиᴛыʙᴀᴇᴛᴄя ᴛᴏᴧьᴋᴏ ᴇᴄᴧи нᴀɜʙᴀниᴇ ᴛᴏᴦᴏ иᴧи инᴏᴦᴏ ᴋᴧиᴨᴀ будᴇᴛ нᴀᴨиᴄᴀнᴏ ᴨᴩᴀʙиᴧьнᴏ. #интерактивы

💋2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ruckusnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

BLETZ ੯•́໒꒱ᖴᒪᓍᓍᕲ✙🐢
@bletz_Info · 62
1 post
𝗖𝗔𝗘𝗟𝗢𝗥𝗔 𝗙𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗗
@caelora_fl · 35
1 post
𝓒ɦׅⲓ᥍ⲓ ẜƖ𑄝𑄝𝖽| ⲓ𝗇fᦅ
@chisiflood · 107
1 post
Чистка сз 𝓒.𝐥̴а𝐫𝐦ι F𝐥̴о̴̥о𝐝 🐢
@Clarmi_flood · 115
1 post
𝖼𝗋𝘶𝗌𝗁 𝗅𝘰𝗏𝖾 info. ⏳
@crushloveinfo · 51
1 post
🌊𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓪 𝓸𝓯 𝓼𝓪𝓴𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓯𝓵𝓸𝓸𝓭🌺
@dobro_pozhalovat_na_chernuirunok · 140
1 post
⏝ֽ۠۠〬. ∕∕ 𝐄d᳢ı𝐓𝘪ꪮ𝕟〔情報〕
@editionfld · 61
1 post
𝓕𝓵𝓸𝓸𝓭 - 𝓔𝓝𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼
@enchanesflood · 60
1 post
info famous
@famousfloodinffo · 78
1 post
𝖿𝗅𝖺𝗑𝗂 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 ꒰ !! ꒱
@flaxi_forever · 118
1 post
🔒 hиrt ꪮ !
@huussht · 41
1 post
𝔍𝔢𝔫𝔫𝔦𝔢 𝔣𝔩𝔬𝔬𝔡
@jennis_flod · 21
1 post
ƙҽɳԃιx ϝʅσσԃ/info
@kendixflood · 118
1 post
𓈒 ᳸ 𝕜𝗁𐐼‌ִꪦ𝕥ꜱꭎꪦ𐐼‌ִ fIооⅾ ᕱ⑅ᕱ
@khantsuna · 163
1 post
𝑰𝑵𝑭𝑶-/𝑲𝑰𝑻𝑻𝑬𝑵𝑺 𝑭𝑳𝑶𝑶𝑫
@kittens_flooood · 85
1 post
𝑀𝒶𝓋𝑒𝓁𝓁𝑒 ᥫ᭡ 𝒾𝓃𝒻𝑜 🍓
@mavellek · 111
1 post
𝙿𝚄𝚁𝙴 𝙾𝙿𝚄𝙻𝙴𝙽𝙲𝙴 𞥊 | 𝚒 𝚗 𝚏 𝚘
@PureOpulence_flood · 146
1 post
рест влд, рп в лс // 𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐆𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐅𝐋𝐎𝐎𝐃 ||ᶦᶰᶠᵒ
@religionflood · 110
1 post
WhoLove
@WhoLoveFd · 48
1 post
𑣲￶ 귀.‍‍‍‍𝗬𝗔𝗠𝗙𝗜 𝖥𝖫𝖣 🔒
@ymfFLD · 73
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ʀυⲥⲕυⲋ ⲛⲉⲱⲋ” (@ruckusnews), 5 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruckusnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.