Scenery at the Laoniuwan section of the Yellow River in Jungar Banner, Erdos, N China's Inner Mongolia.
👍1

Channel
@ru_news_cn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001529346020 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ru_news_cn |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 25 March 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ru_news_cn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 13 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 11 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 8 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 8 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2022 to 23 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Scenery at the Laoniuwan section of the Yellow River in Jungar Banner, Erdos, N China's Inner Mongolia.
👍1
❗️北京意识到,俄罗斯是一个战略伙伴,与之共同经历一个地缘政治风暴的时代将更加安全。 "我们正在推动百年不遇的变革,"习近平同志在告别时说。没有人知道当俄罗斯总统抵达中国时,世界会是什么样子。有一点是肯定的--不是所有的国家和岛屿都能经受住这个变化的时代。 ❗️ В Пекине осознают, что Россия — стратегический партнер, вместе с которым пройти эпоху геополитических бурь будет значительно безопаснее. «Мы двигаем перемены, которых не было 100 лет», – заявил товарищ Си на прощание. Никто не знает, каким будет мир в момент приезда российского президент…
👍1
❗️⚡️ 俄罗斯将与中国缔结战略 "2030计划"--米修斯金 ❗️⚡️ Россия заключит с КНР стратегический "план 2030" — Мишустин 🇷🇺🇨🇳
👍1
"习近平向西方传递了可怕的信息,告诉 "亲爱的朋友 "弗拉基米尔-普京,"百年不遇的变革即将到来,我们将一起做这件事" - Daily mail "Си Цзиньпин передает Западу пугающее послание, говоря "дорогому другу" Владимиру Путину, что "грядут перемены, которых не было за 100 лет и мы их осуществляем вместе" — Daily mail
👍1
☝️☢️🗣 - 🇷🇺Жириновский рассуждал об этом
Китайская телепередача Z-talk (да, повезло с названием) разбирает ситуацию вокруг американских биолабораторий на Украине. Отсылки классические - японский отряд 731, химоружие во Вьетнаме, и так далее. Весьма компактно и доходчиво - и с английскими субтитрами.
Photo, posted without a caption
‼️美国故意将欧盟与中国和俄罗斯对立起来 - 环球时报 美国:世界纪录--10场战争,600万人死亡,没有制裁--中国外交部发言人赵立坚 乌克兰危机不会影响中国与包括俄罗斯在内的其他国家的贸易--中国外交部 U.S. deliberately pits EU against China and Russia - Global Times U.S.: world record - 10 wars, 6 million dead, no sanctions - Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian Ukraine crisis will not affect China's trade with other countries, including Russia - Chinese Foreign Ministry
🌏俄罗斯副外长里亚布科夫:金砖国家将成为世界新秩序的核心 | Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov: BRICS will become the core of the new world order
🇷🇺🇨🇳 俄罗斯外长拉夫罗夫今天在北京与中国外长会晤时讨论的话题。 - 拉夫罗夫谈到了特别行动的进展和与乌克兰的谈判。 - 双方指出,美国和盟国对俄罗斯的制裁具有反作用。 - 双方表示,他们继续加强战略伙伴关系,在全球事务中以一个声音说话。 - 他们讨论了阿富汗问题、伊朗核计划和朝鲜半岛问题。 | Topics discussed by Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov at today's meeting in Beijing with his Chinese counterpart: - Lavrov spoke about the progress of the special operation and negotiations with Ukraine. - The sides noted the counterproductive nature of U.S. and al…
Have you ever seen the largest natural flower sea in the world? Spring is approaching and hundreds of miles of azaleas are about to bloom in Guizhou. 你见过世界上最大的天然花海吗? 春天将至,贵州百里杜鹃花即将绽放。
"The war against us started much earlier," said Anna Belkina, deputy editor-in-chief at @RT_com, in an exclusive interview with China Daily. The West's veil of "free speech" has fallen as it shuts down voices other than its own. “对我们发起的战争开始得更早,” @RT_com 的副主编安娜贝尔金娜在接受中国日报专访时说。 西方“言论自由”的面纱已经被扯下,它禁止了自己以外的其他所有声音。
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ru_news_cn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@ru_news_cn named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Russia & China News (俄罗斯和中国) 🐼🐻” (@ru_news_cn), 13 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ru_news_cn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.