I think I got something that is on major discount before the next leg up ๐
โค7

Channel
@rtmalphagems
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
240subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002417651965 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rtmalphagems |
| Description | ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ณ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐.. ๐ฟ: https://x.com/cryptrtm ๐ซ๐๐ถ๐น ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ต๐ญ๐จ ! |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rtmalphagems |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 240 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 240 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 January 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 8 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
54 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 38 | 70.4% | |
| ๐ฅ | 10 | 18.5% | |
| ๐ณ | 4 | 7.41% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.85% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 January 2026 to 28 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @rtmalphagems. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 January 2026 to 28 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
I think I got something that is on major discount before the next leg up ๐
โค7
Onchain seems a little slow last few days, few runners here and there but nothing special. Waiting patiently for the big runers
โค4
GM
๐ฅ4
Show some love and lets keep cooking
โค9
https://x.com/cryptrtm/status/2047600465857179889
๐ฅ3
We will cook hard this year
โค3๐1
Chad is leading
โค2
The last 2 weeks in the lab: - @CryptRTM the chad is leading with 340x CALL!!! WHAT A HUGE CHAD - Average gain 350% - Top 10 avg gain - 81x (!!) - Caught ALL the biggest runners (Both Asteroids, MAGA, UNC, FLORK etc) - Median 81% - At least 2x on 43% of the shares I purged yesterday 40 members - and I'll continue to purge almost every day until every here is SUPER active. let's cook
๐ฅ3โค2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Blessed
๐ณ4
Photo, posted without a caption
โค3
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rtmalphagems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐น๐ป๐ด'๐ ๐จ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐ฐโ (@rtmalphagems), 240 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rtmalphagems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.