Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

РазДельный Сбор

@rsbor_ru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,314subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001443291892
TypeChannel
Username@rsbor_ru
Created3 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rsbor_ru

Growth

3,3143,3253,319.56 August 2026 — 3,325 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,322 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,321 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,314 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,312–3,327 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:033,314-7
9 Aug 2026, 16:013,321-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:473,322-3
6 Aug 2026, 07:063,325first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 3,314 subscribers
Avg views / post
393
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (29 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total4,321
Reactions total109
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

99 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6767.7%
🔥2020.2%
👍55.05%
👎44.04%
🤔33.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC256 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

За годы работы «РазДельного Сбора» мы не раз убеждались: сообщество может менять ситуацию. Вместе мы добивались важных решений, продвигали раздельный сбор, меняли правила игры и показывали, что голос каждого имеет значение. Сейчас у нас с вами появилась ещё одна возможность объединить усилия ради важных дел. Нашу Ассоциацию выбрали для участия в программе «Совкомбанк про добро», где пользователи распределяют средств

🔥123

5 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC273 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Плёнки, пакеты, дой-паки и другая гибкая упаковка удобны в использовании: они лёгкие, занимают мало места и помогают сохранять продукты. Но собрать и переработать их очень сложно. Проблема начинается на этапе сбора: в общем потоке отходов плёнка загрязняется, разлетается, а разные виды такой упаковки могут отличаться по составу. Из-за этого даже на автоматической сортировке сложно выделить пригодную для переработки

14

3 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC328 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Одноразовая упаковка, лишние пакеты и приборы часто расстраивают тех, кто заботится о природе. Но рынок готовой еды продолжает расти: с 2019 до 2023 года он вырос в 1,6 раза. Неудивительно: доставка удобна и сильно экономит время. Исследование АНО «Фудшеринг» показывает, что экономится не только время. Авторы сравнили экологический след домашней еды, готовых блюд из магазина и ресторанной доставки. Оценивали не толь

12👍5👎4🤔3

2 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC397 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Международная федерация футбола FIFA проводит чемпионаты мира по футболу и уже не первый год развивает систему обращения с отходами на своих турнирах. В её основе — иерархия обращения с отходами. Экологизация чемпионата включает предотвращение образования отходов, повторное использование временных конструкций и материалов, сокращение одноразовой упаковки, рациональное планирование питания команд и зрителей. Пригодны

12🔥8

31 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC≈1,240 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сбор вторсырья в Петербурге — уже завтра. Напоминаем самое важное. 👉 Вторсырьё будем принимать на 13 точках в разных районах города. На всех точках можно отдать лекарства для «Благотворительной больницы». Все адреса, время работы — в форме регистрации 👉 Краткий список вторсырья — в карточках. Подробная информация о том, как его подготовить — в статье 👉 На всех точках, кроме акции на ул. Долгоозёрной, можно получи

17

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @rsbor_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 31,737 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РазДельный Сбор” (@rsbor_ru), 3,314 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rsbor_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.