Channel
@rrumeip
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
361subscribers
+37 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002089694645 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rrumeip |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rrumeip |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 19:50 | 361 | +4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:26 | 357 | +2 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 355 | +8 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 347 | +7 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 340 | +3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 337 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 333 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 329 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:20 | 324 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 324 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
269 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 95 | 35.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 64 | 23.8% | |
| 🍓 | 61 | 22.7% | |
| custom 5395846411298291820 | 31 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5231300531946802387 | 11 | 4.09% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 2.60% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
вспомнила, как Сяоши улыбался сообщению Лу Гуана, и подумала смешно было бы, если бы Лу Гуан смог со стороны понаблюдать, как этот идиот хихикает в телефон. он бы отправил еще несколько соо, чтобы убедиться, но ему бы стало неловко после такого подходить
💘13custom 52313005319468023873🍓2
я все еще очень люблю, когда персонажа цепляет смех и голос другого человека. именно успокоение и желание послушать еще хоть немного, хотя не знаю почему
💘13custom 53958464112982918203💯2🍓1
я уже несколько дней думаю о смехе Чэн Сяоши кстати 💕 cr.
custom 539584641129829182012💘4
мне нужен кадр где взрослый Чэн Сяоши все таки дотягивается до маленького Лу Гуана чтобы кто-то сделал эдит под эту песню и there’s no need to be brave 😡
💘6🍓4custom 52313005319468023871
а я говорила что все плохо 🥺
custom 52313005319468023877❤🔥3🍓3💘2
у сезонов, если смотреть залпом, очень отличаются вайбы (для меня) но это как будто и позволяет посмотреть на них с разной стороны 💕 я все еще ужасно трясусь с Лу Гуана, когда речь заходит о его страхах. словно даже смотря на взрослого персонажа, передо мной все еще кто-то крайне уязвимый и боящийся ощутить беспомощность. если думать о том, что для Чэн Сяоши он «свет», то это мягкий и успокаивающий свет, но все еще …
❤🔥11💘5🍓4
я повторяюсь и уже много раз подобное говорила, но мне нравится его умение адаптироваться и замечать. при всей импульсивности, он не глупый, способный выстраивать полноценные планы и я дико люблю, как он вырос и постепенно становится тем, на кого могут полагаться другие. но зная какой ценой я боюсь знать, что будет дальше.
❤🔥8🍓6💘4
я всегда возвращаюсь к одним и тем же выводам, когда пересматриваю линк клик 😞 я наконец залпом пересмотрела инду, и мне нравится, как их отношения там выглядят более уязвимо, потому что больше заметны страхи обоих (когда Чэн Сяоши боится, что Лу Гуан его оставит, а Лу Гуан после каждого кошмара ищет его взглядом и стремится оставаться рядом). Чэн Сяоши замечает его присутствие и этого достаточно, они оба не пытаютс…
❤🔥11🍓7💘5
мне кажется за эту неделю линк клик психоза я останусь без друзей 😭очень страшно.
💘12🍓5
сегодня я случайно снова вспомнила об этом 😡
🍓11💘3
НОРМАЛЬНО ВООБЩЕ
❤🔥20💘4🍓3
если что люблю я реально все 💕 я жестко страдаю под песни инду, но эти как будто дают мне силы не сойти с ума
💘11🍓2💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @rrumeip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“джинчурик за кадром” (@rrumeip), 361 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rrumeip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.