Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ІНТЕГРАТОР Новин

Channel

ІНТЕГРАТОР Новин

@rrrteeeeed

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

34,561subscribers

-3,351 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001589630369
TypeChannel
Username@rrrteeeeed
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/rrrteeeeed

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@in_factum/476227 Sept 2026, 07:32 UTC@rrrteeeeed/45545 · this entry7 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC1.001.8 hours
@in_factum/493837 Nov 2026, 18:13 UTC@rrrteeeeed/47128 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 09:29 UTC1.0015 hours
@in_factum/4792818 Sept 2026, 08:38 UTC@rrrteeeeed/46114 · this entry18 Sept 2026, 09:38 UTC1.0059 minutes
@in_factum/476237 Sept 2026, 07:32 UTC@rrrteeeeed/45549 · this entry7 Sept 2026, 09:34 UTC1.002.0 hours
@in_factum/4948210 Nov 2026, 21:45 UTC@rrrteeeeed/47191 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 13:10 UTC1.0015 hours
@in_factum/4881617 Oct 2026, 19:25 UTC@rrrteeeeed/46650 · this entry18 Oct 2026, 10:42 UTC0.9815 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@in_factum6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.998.7 hours@in_factum (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 2,139 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

34,56137,91236,236.56 August 202611 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net -3,351. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,058–38,415 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 21:0034,561-48
9 Nov 2026, 21:1734,609-42
8 Nov 2026, 09:5734,651-41
7 Nov 2026, 07:5734,692-34
6 Nov 2026, 07:5934,726-18
5 Nov 2026, 10:5934,744-34
4 Nov 2026, 07:1134,778-26
3 Nov 2026, 08:5134,804-33
2 Nov 2026, 11:1834,837-40
1 Nov 2026, 09:3534,877-28
31 Oct 2026, 08:1734,905-35
30 Oct 2026, 10:1834,940-24
29 Oct 2026, 08:4634,964-29
28 Oct 2026, 05:4634,993-25
27 Oct 2026, 02:2135,018-17
26 Oct 2026, 05:1735,035-36
25 Oct 2026, 07:1835,071-26
24 Oct 2026, 10:0035,097-28
23 Oct 2026, 12:1635,125-29
22 Oct 2026, 12:0135,154first reading

Engagement

2,187 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 184 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.61%
avg views ÷ 34,561 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
602 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
602
of 2,187 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 601 of 602 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held2,187 (5 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total1,166,312
Reactions total19,287
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 06:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈23,400
Videos
≈14,500
Links
≈34,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 05m
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 222 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

34,335 reactions across 999 posts, in 61 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬9,69428.2%
😢5,08914.8%
❤4,40112.8%
👍3,4149.94%
🙏3,0578.90%
🔥1,4854.33%
🤣1,2793.73%
😭1,2093.52%
🤡8102.36%
❤‍🔥5091.48%
😱4291.25%
😡3511.02%
🤮3390.987%
👎3140.915%
🤯2480.722%
🤔1870.545%
💩1850.539%
🖕1720.501%
💔1710.498%
👏1510.44%
41 further kinds8412.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 999 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,335 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 23 September 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rrrteeeeed. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 23 September 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 602 posts held from the last 30 days (0.498%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 05:52 UTC265 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

ППО збило або подавило 81 ворожий БпЛА під час нічної атаки За повідомленням Генштабу ЗСУ, в ніч на 14 листопада ворог атакував з напрямків Брянськ, Орел, Приморсько-Ахтарськ, ТОТ Донецьк та ТОТ Крим. Під час атаки застосували 96 ударних БпЛА типів Shahed, Гербера та «Пародія». На 07:30 ППО збило/подавило 81 безпілотник, з них 52 реактивні. Зафіксовано влучання ворога на 8 локаціях та падіння уламків на 2 локаціях…

🫡1

14 Nov 2026, 00:09 UTC≈1,310 views39 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Естонія повідомила подробиці удару по кораблю РФ в Усть-Лузі Естонський полковник Арон Калмус повідомив, що малий ракетний корабель РФ «Наро‑Фомінськ» зазнав >3 влучань безпілотників під час атаки на порт Усть-Луга в ніч на 11 листопада. Калмус підтвердив, що судно отримало пошкодження, серед екіпажу є загиблі та поранені, і воно не змогло самостійно дістатися Петербурга. За даними СБУ, у рамках тієї ж операції …

👍29❤6🤣2😈2

13 Nov 2026, 20:14 UTC≈1,740 views40 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚖️ Польща призупиняє внески до програми PURL Прем'єр-міністр Польщі Дональд Туск повідомив, що Польща тимчасово призупиняє внески до програми PURL - механізму фінансування закупівлі американського озброєння для України. Туск пояснив рішення дефіцитом бюджету та зростанням витрат на власну оборону. Раніше Польща оголосила про внесок 100 млн дол та планований додатковий внесок 50 млн євро у вересні 2026 року. 🔗 Дже…

🤬31🤣5😨3👏1

13 Nov 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,030 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

Рада отримала від Президента підписані три закони щодо економічної безпеки та банкрутства Верховна Рада отримала підписані Президентом закони 5038-IX, 5062-IX та 5066-IX. Закон 5038-IX запроваджує кримінальну відповідальність за передачу, одержання, придбання чи зберігання засобів доступу до банківських рахунків, електронних гаманців і “дроп-рахунків” у злочинних схемах. Закон 5062-IX спрощує провадження з банкрут…

👍8❤1👏1🖕1🤣1

13 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC≈1,940 views29 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

🪖 Зенітники 1027-го полку збили «Герань-5» зі шведського ПЗРК Зенітники 1027-го зенітного ракетно-артилерійського полку першими в Київській області збили безпілотний комплекс «Герань-5» за допомогою шведського ПЗРК RBS-70. Командування подякувало військам за влучність і витримку та відзначило роль Швеції і партнерів у постачанні озброєння. ІНТЕГРАТОР Новин

❤14👍11🖕1🤡1🤣1🫡1

13 Nov 2026, 14:52 UTC≈1,840 views32 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Кернел та інші переробники зупинили олійні заводи через удари РФ Кернел зупинив усі олійні заводи після ударів дронів, які пошкодили будівлі, обладнання та резервуари. Компанія припинила закупівлі насіння та продовжує відвантаження зі складів. Одночасно зупинилися Дельта Вілмар Україна і дніпровські Потоки, а також Віктор і К. Сумарна потужність цих заводів - близько 1,5 млн т на рік. Експерти попереджають про риз…

😢23🤬4❤2💔1🕊1🤣1

13 Nov 2026, 14:42 UTC≈1,700 views23 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚡ Фінляндія звернулася до України через ураження корвета в Фінській затоці Фінляндія поінформувала Україну після того, як безпілотник уразив російський корвет класу Буян-М поблизу Суурсаарі (Гогланд) вранці в середу. Міністр оборони Антті Хаккянен сказав, що вузька Фінська затока є вразливою та крихкою для оборони і що це створює ризики для судноплавства. СБУ повідомила, що 11 листопада вона спланувала й реалізува…

👍19❤2🤣1🫡1

13 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,680 views26 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Україна випустила майже 1 200 дронів по Росії під час нічної операції За повідомленням російського Міноборони, між пізнім четвергом і ранком п’ятниці їх збили 1 198 дронів; місцеві власті повідомили про 7 загиблих і 17 поранених у трьох регіонах. Паралельно переговори США і Росії розширилися до обговорення європейської безпекової архітектури, що викликало занепокоєння Європи. Залагоджуючи тему, американські делега…

🔥14❤5🤡4🤮2🤣1

13 Nov 2026, 13:38 UTC≈1,730 views26 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

📌 Лубінець: Олешки напівзруйновані, без світла та опалення Народний депутат Сергій Лубінець повідомив, що місто Олешки перебуває в напівзруйнованому стані. За його словами, там немає електрики та опалення. Лубінець зазначив, що місцеві мешканці виживали завдяки тому, що Збройні сили доставляли їжу дронами. ІНТЕГРАТОР Новин

😱13❤4🙏4🤮2❤‍🔥1🤣1🤬1

13 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTC≈1,650 views32 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

30 постраждалих унаслідок російського удару по п’ятиповерхівці в Запоріжжі, серед них 6 дітей, повідомила ДСНС. Рятувальники деблокували 17 осіб; пошуково-рятувальні роботи завершено. ІНТЕГРАТОР Новин

🤬17😢10🤡2❤1❤‍🔥1🤣1

13 Nov 2026, 13:19 UTC≈1,610 views21 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

⚖️ Суд підтвердив 2 роки ув'язнення для нардепки Марченко Апеляційний суд Києва, за повідомленням суду, ухвалив вирок народній депутатці з Тернопільщини Людмилі Марченко - 2 роки позбавлення волі за зловживання впливом. Її помічниці суд замінив покарання: замість 2 років ув'язнення призначили штраф 92 000 грн. За версією обвинувачення, Марченко та помічниця за гроші обіцяли оформити дозволи на виїзд та внести дані…

👍11❤3🤮3🤬2⚡1🤣1

13 Nov 2026, 11:43 UTC≈1,680 views16 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

🚨 Підготовка гуманітарної операції в Костянтинівці може зайняти місяці Народний депутат Дмитро Лубінець повідомив, що в Костянтинівці, ймовірно, перебувають цивільні громадяни України, але встановити їхню кількість неможливо через відсутність фізичного доступу співробітників. Лубінець заявив, що територія є активно замінованою, мінування триває щодня за участі російських військ, тому гуманітарну місію можна починат…

💯9❤‍🔥3❤1🤣1🤬1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,187 posts we hold for @rrrteeeeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@rrrteeeeed edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ІНТЕГРАТОР Новин” (@rrrteeeeed), 34,561 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rrrteeeeed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.