Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

раф на тревожном молоке

@rrafonmilk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

678subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002315089601
TypeChannel
Username@rrafonmilk
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rrafonmilk

Growth

6766786776 August 2026 — 676 subscribers6 August 2026 — 676 subscribers14 August 2026 — 678 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 676–678 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 11:46678+2
6 Aug 2026, 16:39676no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:50676first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 3 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

450 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 523823085252091397812628.0%
9821.8%
❤‍🔥8418.7%
custom 5467794973296452899286.22%
🦄276.00%
👏265.78%
👨‍💻235.11%
custom 5292028045207552733214.67%
custom 5456331757123035628132.89%
custom 546317351117654109440.889%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 450reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2025 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jun 2026, 17:33 UTC569 views55 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Самовыражение VS самоповреждение: где заканчивается эстетика и должен начаться поход к психиатру TW: в тексте обсуждаются самоповреждения, суицидальные мысли, травма и телесные модификации. Без описания способов и инструкций, но тема может быть триггерной 💗Татуировка после расставания — самовыражение или тревожный звоночек? Пирсинг на все ухо — эстетика или "мне нужно почувствовать хоть что-то"? А если человек меня

custom 546779497329645289925custom 5456331757123035628127custom 52382308525209139787custom 54631735111765410944

29 Mar 2026, 16:03 UTC≈1,130 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

17custom 54677949732964528993custom 52382308525209139782🦄1

29 Mar 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,110 views59 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Циклотимия: мягкая форма биполярности? Вчера мне удалось поговорить на Школе биполярного расстройства 2026 о циклотимии и о сложностях установки диагноза и подбора терапии Если кратко: у нас нет гайдлайнов, нет препаратов и нет четкого понимания что такое циклотимия. Мы не знаем как она развивается, не очень понимаем у кого и чем мы можем помочь. Мы можем сказать что не является циклотимией (БАР) и чем не надо лечи

❤‍🔥37🦄10custom 523823085252091397883custom 54563317571230356281

20 Mar 2026, 21:34 UTC850 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @psy_and_neuroPhoto

Школа биполярного расстройства 2026: для специалистов 🙂 Можно ли на самом деле говорить о биполярном расстройстве II типа, как терапия влияет не только на симптомы, но и на тело, и почему концентрация лития до сих пор имеет значение в клинической практике? На эти и другие вопросы ответят ведущие эксперты в области психиатрии в рамках научной программы Школы биполярного расстройства 2026. Мы обсудим современные подх

custom 523823085252091397816👨‍💻98🦄5👏1

14 Mar 2026, 19:18 UTC≈1,130 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Хорошие новости из мира психиатрии, или ученые снова все изучили и неожиданно нашли что то приятное 💗Если читать новости слишком долго, может показаться, что ученые занимаются исключительно поиском новых способов объяснить, почему нам всем плохо и как может стать еще хуже. Но иногда происходит почти 8е чудо света: выходит исследование, которое даже слегка утешает. 💗Сегодня для нас с вами 9 новых находок из психиатр

custom 523823085252091397821👏128👨‍💻2🦄2

8 Mar 2026, 05:50 UTC≈1,370 views91 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

8 марта: им говорили «улыбаться», а они делали науку Каждый год 8 марта мы наблюдаем одну и ту же странную трансформация. День, который возник как день борьбы за права женщин, внезапно превращается в «праздник весны, нежности и красоты». Словно это не дата про политические и социальные права, а какой-то сезонный апдейт природы: тюльпаны, открытки и фраза «оставайтесь такими же прекрасными и украшайте этот мир». Но

❤‍🔥43custom 52382308525209139782416🦄5👏3

31 Jan 2026, 21:28 UTC≈1,330 views57 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Первое правило бойцовского клуба: не говори о бойцовском клубе 💗Неудобный пациент? Психопатия. Конфликтный коллега? Тоже. Бывший? Ну вы поняли. Проблема в том, что в современной психиатрии такого диагноза просто не существует - это стигматизирующий мем из фильмов и старых учебников. На самом деле речь идёт о расстройствах личности, но в нем речь не о м*даках, а про мозг, который слишком хорошо выучил когда-то рабочи

19custom 523823085252091397816👨‍💻8custom 52920280452075527336❤‍🔥4🦄4

29 Nov 2025, 18:53 UTC≈1,570 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @psy_and_neuroPhoto

Расстройство дефицита внимания и гиперактивности (РДВГ) традиционно ассоциируется с детским возрастом, однако уже много лет научные исследования отмечают, что симптомы могут сохраняться и проявляться и во взрослом возрасте. Статья Cortese et al. 2025, вышедшая в журнале World Psychiatry, ставит перед собой цель собрать современные эмпирические данные, обозначить пробелы и противоречия, а также предложить направления

custom 523823085252091397812👏10custom 529202804520755273375

3 Nov 2025, 12:03 UTC≈3,400 views47 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Почему побочки в инструкции это не так страшно, или как проводятся исследования препаратов 💗 Когда-то инструкции к таблеткам казались скучными: побочка, противопоказания, хранить в недоступном для детей месте. А потом ты вырос, начал лечиться и вдруг понял, что инструкция скорее напоминает сценарий "Черного зеркала": галлюцинации, агрессия, инсульт, смерть. Но тут важно понять одну вещь: инструкции — это не список

custom 52382308525209139782015custom 52920280452075527338👨‍💻4

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @rrafonmilk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 46,238 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“раф на тревожном молоке” (@rrafonmilk), 678 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rrafonmilk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.