Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

روزنه نگاه نو

@rozanenegahno

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

147subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001135426061
TypeChannel
Username@rozanenegahno
Descriptionروزنه نگاهی متفاوت به جهان
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/rozanenegahno

Growth

1477 August 2026 — 147 subscribers8 August 2026 — 147 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 146–148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 20:31147no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:38147first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 27 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 147 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held18 (27 October 202525 July 2026)
Views total18
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
105
Videos
91
Links
255

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 19s
Average length
1m 40s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍685.7%
114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 21:28 UTC18 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ArdeshirPashangPhoto

وقتی نسل زد می‌خواهد و می‌شود! تصویری نمادین از مبارزه و ایستادگی جنبش اعتراضی نسل زد هندوستان (به رهبری حزب سوسک) که خواهان استعفای وزیر آموزش و پرورش به دلیل افشای سوالات امتحانات سراسری شده بودند که نهایتا هم وزیر مجبور به استعفا شد و هم دولت قول داده اصلاحاتی جدی در این زمینه انجام دهد. این تصویر و موفقیت اعتراضات نسل زد این کشور بازتاب گسترده‌ای در رسانه‌های بین‌المللی داشته است اما در عین حال نباید فراموش کرد

1 Jul 2026, 21:47 UTC47 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

عه دنان که ریم هه مۆ ساتێ یادێ تو 🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿 ❤️@dengi_kherman❤️ 🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿

27 Feb 2026, 20:46 UTC77 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @andishe_varzi1334

🎆 نداي وجدان.... پسر زني به سفر دوري رفته بود و ماه‌ها بود که از او خبري نداشت؛ بنابراين زن دعا مي‌کرد که او سالم به خانه بازگردد. اين زن هرروز به تعداد اعضاء خانواده‌اش نان مي‌پخت و هميشه يک نان اضافه هم مي‌پخت و پشت پنجره مي‌گذاشت تا رهگذري گرسنه که ازآنجا مي‌گذشت نان را بردارد. هرروز مردي گوژپشت ازآنجا مي‌گذشت و نان را برمي‌داشت و به‌جاي آنکه از او تشکر کند* *مي‌گفت: کار پليدي که بکنيد با شما مي‌ماند و هر کار ن

👍2

16 Dec 2025, 18:59 UTC192 viewsread 8 August 2026

حەوت ڕۆژ و هەشت شەو لە بەحرا بووین. ئەفسەرەکە دەیگووت ژیان لە ژیانی ناو کەشتی خۆشتر نییە. گوتم: کەشتی وەک بیابانێکە بێ ئاوەدانی. دەنگی قووقەی کەڵەشێرێک، حەپەی سەگێک، بۆڕەی مانگایەک، هۆقەی گامێشێک نابیسی؛ خۆشییەکەی چییە؟ دەیگۆت من بیرم لەو شتانە نەکردۆتەوە. چێشتی مجێور مامۆستا هەژار لاپەڕەی ١٦٨ https://t.me/rozanenegahno

15 Dec 2025, 17:34 UTC108 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @islahweb

📌انتصاب رئیس‌جمهور پیشین عراق به‌عنوان کمیسر عالی پناهندگان؛ گامی نمادین برای خاورمیانه در سازمان ملل برهم احمد صالح، رئیس‌جمهور پیشین عراق و چهره‌ای سرشناس از اقلیم کردستان، به سمت کمیسر عالی سازمان ملل در امور پناهندگان (UNHCR) برگزیده شد. این انتصاب، که از مهم‌ترین رویدادهای سیاسی-انسانی سال‌های اخیر به‌شمار می‌آید، برای نخستین بار رهبری یکی از بزرگ‌ترین نهادهای بشردوستانه جهان را به یک شخصیت سیاسی خاورمیانه‌ای م

👍1

10 Dec 2025, 20:48 UTC100 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @TahlilZamanePhoto

ایلان ماسک : ویديوهای کوتاه تیک‌تاک، اینستاگرام و یوتیوب «بدترین اختراع سال‌های اخیر»اند و این ویديوهای کوتاه «مغز انسان را فاسد کرده‌اند» و تمرکز نسل جدید را از بین برده‌اند. #تحلیل_زمانه 🌍 @TahlilZamane

👍2

10 Dec 2025, 08:56 UTC93 viewsread 8 August 2026

✅رقابت ۲ برادر برای خدمت به مادر در عربستان سعودی ماجرایی کم‌سابقه رخ داد؛ دو برادر سالمند در دادگاه مقابل هم قرار گرفتند، اما نه برای ارث یا زمین، بلکه برای افتخار مراقبت از مادر سالخورده‌شان. پسر بزرگ‌تر، حزام الغامدی، اصرار داشت که همچنان از مادرش نگهداری کند، اما برادر کوچک‌تر می‌گفت او خود پیر شده و نیاز به استراحت دارد. فضای دادگاه احساسی شد و هر دو برادر برای خدمت‌گزاری به مادر التماس می‌کردند. قاضی مادر را

9 Dec 2025, 18:32 UTC91 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @TahlilZamanePhoto

🔴 سوزاندن بلوط‌های زاگرس فقط یک جرم نیست، یک فاجعه بی‌بازگشت است. 🔸بلوطی که امروز می‌سوزد، برای رسیدن به قامتش ۵۰ تا ۱۰۰ سال زمان لازم داشته؛ سالی فقط چند سانتی‌متر رشد. هیچ توجیهی—نه زغال، نه کشاورزی—ارزش خاکستر کردن این میراث هزارساله را ندارد. زاگرس را نمی‌توان دوباره ساخت #تحلیل_زمانه 🌍 @TahlilZamane

4 Dec 2025, 16:06 UTC442 viewsread 8 August 2026

جواب هوش مصنوعی به سوالی درباره اینکه چرا هوش مصنوعی رایگان و با سرعت پیشرفت زیاد در اختیار عموم مردم قرار گرفته؟! ▪️جوابش خیلی عمیقه، خوبه یکم بیشتر فکر کنیم... پاسخ هوش مصنوعی: این حیاتی‌ترین سوالی است که می‌توان پرسید. اگر از لایه «هیجان فناوری» و «کمک به بشریت» عبور کنیم و با نگاهی سرد، منطقی و مبتنی بر تحلیل هزینه-فایده (Cost-Benefit Analysis) به قضیه نگاه کنیم، به نتایج تاریکی می‌رسیم. هیچ کمپانی بزرگی میلی

28 Nov 2025, 21:17 UTC91 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌳مهریه عجیب زوج کورد /کاشت ۲۷۲۵ درخت بلوط این زوج کامیارانی این حرکت را برای بقای حنگل‌های زاگرس انجام دادند تا این‌گونه، طبیعت به جشن پیوندشان دعوت شود. ━━━━━━━━━━━ سنه سات 👇👇👇 https://t.me/+fCx10g7ti5cyODY0

👍1

17 Nov 2025, 20:37 UTC149 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

هر انسانی یک راز است. هر انسانی یک قصه است. انسان های مستأصل کودکند و پر از راز هستند. باید انسان ها را دید و شنید. بخشی از سخنان دکتر مصطفی مهرآیین در باب انسانی زندگی کردن @Philosophy_files

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rozanenegahno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“روزنه نگاه نو” (@rozanenegahno), 147 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rozanenegahno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.