Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Royalty Amore

@royaltyamore

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

118subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001373370337
TypeChannel
Username@royaltyamore
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/royaltyamore

Growth

1188 Aug 2026, 06:04 — 118 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 04:45 — 118 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:049 Aug 2026, 04:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 04:45118no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:04118first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 118 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.5
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (3 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total158
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
88
Videos
26
Links
53

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
58s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52337110565718992752326.7%
custom 52336144241027013851922.1%
custom 52334945773352800151011.6%
custom 5233225059547519820910.5%
custom 523365481827012706489.30%
custom 523113225942313067978.14%
custom 523131821432718422366.98%
custom 523126790737524469344.65%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC15 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

осенью.

custom 52313182143271842232custom 52336144241027013852

4 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC27 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

цифровая матрица Дэвида Линча

custom 52336144241027013854

30 Jul 2026, 21:01 UTC43 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Royalty Amore - свет на минимум mix : nord silvia ЯМ | все площадки

custom 52337110565718992754custom 52332250595475198203

19 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC73 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52334945773352800154custom 52337110565718992751

14 Jul 2026, 19:15 UTC86 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

я просто дойду до такого уровня , что меня будет невозможно игнорировать

custom 52311322594231306795custom 52336144241027013852

10 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC82 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

neversleepagain

custom 52337110565718992754custom 52332250595475198202

9 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC76 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Royalty Amore - замираю ЯМ | все площадки

custom 52334945773352800154custom 52313182143271842232custom 52337110565718992751

8 Jul 2026, 07:34 UTC73 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 52336144241027013854custom 52313182143271842232

Signed Royalty Amore

25 Jun 2026, 21:03 UTC433 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Royalty Amore - Сваровски ЯМ | все площадки

custom 52332250595475198204custom 52336548182701270642

25 Jun 2026, 17:52 UTC99 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52336144241027013856custom 52312679073752446932custom 52334945773352800152

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @royaltyamore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,069,704 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Royalty Amore” (@royaltyamore), 118 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/royaltyamore.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.