Channel
@roy_grassmann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
410subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002636298189 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roy_grassmann |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roy_grassmann |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 410 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 408 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 408 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (3 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,367 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
27 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 19 | 70.4% | |
| 🤬 | 6 | 22.2% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
„Haraga Ceuta“ – So werben kriminelle Schlepperbanden im Netz für ihre Dienste Illegale Migration nach Europa ist ein fluorierendes Geschäft. Unter dem Überbegriff „Haraga“ versprechen unzählige Social-Media-Accounts ein Leben in Saus und Braus – garniert mit Respektlosigkeiten gegenüber weißen Frauen. von Katharina Schmieder Artikel lesen Kanal abonnieren
🤬6🤮1
Aktion „Letztes Hemd“ geht immer weiter: Sachsens Ortseingangsschilder sind eine Kampfansage an die Regierung! 🤍💚 Kaum ein Ortseingangsschild, an dem derzeit kein Protesthemd zu finden ist. Die Aktion "Letztes Hemd" ist ein voller Erfolg und wird von Tag zu Tag größer. Wir kommen kaum noch hinterher, die Zahl der vielen Einsendungen, die wir aus allen Teilen Sachsens (und auch darüber hinaus) erhalten, zu veröffentl…
👍1
CEUTA-Invasoren mit Fähre aufs Festland verlegt: Keine «Minderjährigen»,... https://youtube.com/watch?v=xwR0Rz1E9ok&is=yQBtcV5i3Yf5DkvZ Unglaublich. Alle Abschieben weil das System das nicht mehr aushalten wird. Das alles ist vorsätzlich gewollte von den Politikern. https://t.me/DieWahrheitundnurdieWahrheit
⚠️ SKANDAL IN STARNBERG: Erster Film für den Weltfrieden gestoppt ❌ Am 3. August 2026 wurde die fast ausverkaufte Filmvorführung von „WARUM ICH – Wolf D. Kroll“ im Breitwand‑Kino Starnberg kurzfristig abgesagt – wegen Drohungen und massivem Druck politisch motivierter linksextremer Gruppierungen. Der Organisator Reiner Bartesch berichtet, dass der Kinobetreiber per E‑Mail eingeschüchtert wurde und sich daraufhin ge…
👍2🔥1
Der Tag, der alles veränderte - Ein Betroffener erzählt seine Geschichte Messerattacken gehören in Deutschland mittlerweile leider zum Alltag. Oft werden die Täter in den Medien lediglich als „junge Männer“ oder „deutsche Staatsbürger“ bezeichnet. Wer zwischen den Zeilen zu lesen weiß, versteht direkt, wer damit gemeint ist. Martin wurde zum Ziel eines dieser zahllosen Beispiele sinnloser und vor allem vermeidbarer …
Die Bedrohung durch 5G und 6G nicht nur auf unsere Gesundheit wird immer gravierender! Doch gibt es Möglichkeiten, sich zumindest gesundheitlich davor zu schützen. Deshalb möchte ich nochmals auf die Abstimmung für den Vortrag hinweisen.
📡🧠 Wi-Fi kann zur Beeinflussung von Gehirnströmen genutzt werden – hat Potenzial für hypnotische Effekte und Social Engineering❗️ Wireless-Fidelity (Wi-Fi) ist schädlich aufgrund der Exposition gegenüber Hochfrequenzstrahlung, der pulsmodulierten HF-Übertragung von Daten, der extrem niederfrequenten (ELF) Wirkung auf das Gehirn und des Wi-Fi-Gedächtniseffekts in Körpergeweben. 👉 Eine der schädlichen Auswirkungen vo…
https://youtu.be/N-Pe84bVSDw
👍5
‼️ Dieses Thema bewegt immer mehr Deutsche: Polnische Konzentrationslager 15 Jahre vor Hitler und dem Nationalsozialismus? Das gab es tatsächlich! Zu diesem Thema biete ich einen Vortrag aus dem Werk "Der vertuschte Völkermord an Deutschen an." Falls Ihr Interesse an diesen noch immer verschwiegenen Ereignissen, könnt Ihr mich gerne unter der Mailadresse: grassmann.r@web.de als Redner buchen. Ansonsten erfahrt …
👍3
Im Osten der BRD scheint sich eine neue Protestform zu etablieren. So findet man häufig an Ortseingangsschildern Kleidungsstücke, auf denen "Mein letztes Hemd" zu lesen ist. Bereits zu den großen Bauernprotesten vor zwei Jahren hingen Paare von Arbeitsschuhen an solchen Schildern. Oftmals wurden sie mit dem Bundschuh der Baurrnkroege in Verbindung gebracht.
👍1
Unübersehbar: Aktion „Letztes Hemd“ geht immer weiter! 🔥 Jeden Tag erreichen uns zahlreiche Einsendungen von Protesthemden, die an den Ortseingangsschildern Sachsens zu sehen sind. Die von der Initiative "Projekt 1 Millionen" ins Leben gerufene Aktion, die auch von den Freien Sachsen unterstützt wird, ist ein riesiger Erfolg. Stark! Aber: Bisher ist ein Großteil der Einsendungen aus dem Bereich West- und Mittelsach…
👍7
Sie können es in anderen Ländern sehen, wie verletzlich rein digitale Zahlungssysteme sind. Sobald die Technik streikt oder Daten angegriffen werden, steht alles still. Bargeld hingegen funktioniert immer – anonym, unabhängig, zuverlässig. Eine Gesellschaft, die nur noch auf digitale Zahlungen setzt, macht sich erpressbar. Vielfalt im Zahlungsverkehr schützt unsere Freiheit. Bewahren wir diese Sicherheit , unterschr…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @roy_grassmann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 436,064 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Der rasende Reporter Roy” (@roy_grassmann), 410 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roy_grassmann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.