Channel
@rouydad_politicalscience
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
196subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001833870495 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rouydad_politicalscience |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rouydad_politicalscience |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 196 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 195 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 196 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 199 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:59 | 201 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 203 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 203 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
250 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 132 | 52.8% | |
| 👍 | 55 | 22.0% | |
| ❤ | 43 | 17.2% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 3.60% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 2.00% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 1.20% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.4% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.4% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پرسش اساسی که در مطالعهی رسالهی نظم گروسراوم، اثر کارل اشمیت، شکل میگیرد این است چرا و چگونه فضا از طرفی هم Staat را ایجاب میکند و هم به نوعی Staat را طرد و آن را منسوخ میپندارد؟ مگر نه این است که در اینجا اشمیت قائل به تمایز دو معنا در مفهوم Staat هست؟ مگر نه این است که میبایست میان سیاست داخلی و سیاست خارجی تمایز قائل شد؟ چگونه میتوان این جمع اضداد را آشتی داد؟ این همان تمایز دوگانه میان امر ارگانیکی و امر …
👍2👎1
او افزود: "من ترجیح میدهم توافق کنم. بهدنبال کشتن مردم نیستم. مردم میمیرند. بسیاری از مردم میمیرند. ما نمیخواهیم این اتفاق بیافتد". 🚫قابل توجه عشاقان تجاوز به میهن که گمان میبرند تهاجم و مداخلهی اجنبی راهی است بهسوی آزادی و رفاه🚫 #کانون_علوم_سیاسی_رویداد @rouydad_politicalscience
💔3👍2👎2
رئیسجمهور دَبَنگِ ایالات متحده، دونالد ترامپ، دربارهی ایران اظهار کرد: "شما نمیدانید چنین حملاتی به کجا ختم میشود. مثلاً آیا کشورهای همسایهی ایران با موج عظیمی از آوارگان روبهرو خواهند شد که به سمت مرزهایشان سرازیر شوند؟ این میتواند یک فاجعه باشد. اتفاقات بسیار بدی ممکن است رخ دهد". #کانون_علوم_سیاسی_رویداد @rouydad_politicalscience
👍1👎1😐1
Derrida and the American Death-Machine Ali-Mohammad Mohajer Nasser employs Jacques Derrida’s philosophy to examine how the American-led liberal order has deconstructed itself through its own claims and contradictions. Read the full essay here: https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/derrida-and-the-american-death-machine
❤3
. 📚 فصلنامه امر سیاسی؛ مرجعی برای آموزش علمی دانش سیاسی. ✒️ فصلنامه امر سیاسی مفتخر خواهد بود تا با همراهی اساتید دانشگاه، پژوهشگران، تحلیلگران، دانشجویان علوم سیاسی و همه علاقهمندان به حوزه سیاست، محتوای علمی در حوزه سیاست تولید کند به گونهای که امر آموزش سیاسی که هدف والای فصلنامه امر سیاسی است محقق گردد. 📚 از همه عزیزان تقاضا میگردد مطابق اطلاعیه فوق مطالب ارزشمند خود را جهت انتشار در رسانههای فصلنامه ارسال ک…
❤4👎1
هیچ جرم و هیچ مجازاتی بدون قانون نیست. اصل بر مشروعیت حقوقی صدور حُکم است، نه خودِ حُکم. #کانون_علوم_سیاسی_رویداد @rouydad_politicalscience
👎9❤4👍1💯1
ارزش دولت بر ارزش فرد تقدم دارد، زیرا دولت تحققبخش نظم حقوقی است. #کانون_علوم_سیاسی_رویداد @rouydad_politicalscience
👎9❤5👍2😍1
دولت ذاتاً حق اعمال خشونت مشروع را دارد. #کانون_علوم_سیاسی_رویداد @rouydad_politicalscience
👎9❤7👍1
اساسِ عقل سلیم، درونی و خودبنیاد است؛ البته نه به معنای فارغ از فضا و مکان و بیرون از آن. این اصل استقلال و آزادی نخستین گام هر عقل سلیمی است، پس بنابراین هر عقل سلیمی مبتنی بر نوعی استقلال سیاسی است. به نوعی هر عقل سلیمی در چارچوب استقلال سیاسی تحقق مییابد. اینکه مداخلهی اجنبی را توجیه کنیم و این توجیه را مبتنی بر نوعی عقل سلیم بدانیم و انتظار داشته باشیم این عقل سلیم در ذیل بیضههای اجنبی حفظ و گسترش یابد، از اسا…
👎13❤3👍1
https://open.substack.com/pub/alimohammadmohajernasser/p/mithras-in-the-cave-of-history?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=8kferk #کانون_علوم_سیاسی_رویداد @rouydad_politicalscience
👌5
کارل اشمیت در یادداشتهای روزانهی خود در دههی ۵۰ مینویسد: "یهودی ادغامشده، دشمن واقعی است". پرواضح است که مفهوم دشمن که اشمیت در اینجا مراد میکند با مفهوم دشمن در رسالهی مفهوم امر سیاسی متمایز است. اون دقیقاً در اینجا به خطری در درون جامعه و واحد سیاسی اشاره میکند. پس بنابراین، میتوان معنایی غیرِ نژادی نیز از این سخن اشمیت مراد کرد. یعنی خطر اصلی نه یک یهودیالااصل و نژاداً یهود، که بعضاً سعی میکنند خود را د…
👎9💯8
اگر ملت برای شما به معنای Nation هست و دولت (State) را تنها در ارتباط با Nation میفهمید، پس ما هیچگاه تو تاریخ این سرزمین چیزی بهنام دولت و ملت نداشتیم! چون اساسا Nation-State ها نه تنها غربی، بلکه کاملا مدرن هستند. و این سنخ سخنان که ما در تاریخِ ایرانِ پیشااسلام هم به نوعی Nation-State داشتیم، از سنخ سخنانِ تاریخ مصرف گذشتهای است که دیگر بهایی به آن نمیدهند. امروزه با توجه به چالشهایی که ما در سالهای اخیر با…
👎7👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rouydad_politicalscience. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانون علوم سیاسی رویداد” (@rouydad_politicalscience), 196 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rouydad_politicalscience.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.