Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Round One Battle

@round1ne

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

272subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002434159019
TypeChannel
Username@round1ne
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/round1ne

Growth

272273272.57 August 2026 — 273 subscribers8 August 2026 — 273 subscribers14 August 2026 — 272 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 272–273 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:36272-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:47273no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:52273first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 19 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 17s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

453 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥12627.8%
🔥12527.6%
🤩9721.4%
custom 5372799870191037491286.18%
custom 5301060262646803410224.86%
custom 5310041425809797946153.31%
custom 5364224362394181354153.31%
custom 5312327044195966512132.87%
custom 530116877929050358961.32%
custom 536413174571941437661.32%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 453reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @round1ne. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 May 2026 to 16 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Jun 2026, 19:02 UTC165 views23 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nikshapesCHVideo

❗️Новый МК 27.06 Сб 12:00-14:00 ❗️ В этом туторе пробуем к плавному кику прямо добавить воздушный прыжок, а выходим мы в мой плавный кик назад с отпрыгиванием назад (из первого видео моих новых обучалок) 🔥 Таким образом, зная принцип, образуется данный вариант 😎 Один из основных принципов (изменение акцентов) разобран в моем онлайн МК, к которому ты можешь присоединиться ✉️

🔥11🤩6custom 53010602626468034105❤‍🔥1

2 Jun 2026, 18:07 UTC799 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Команда Round One благодарит всех причастных к этому дню: 💚 Судей номинаций Shuffle, Cutting Shapes, Debute, Performance 💚 MC Prokroot и DJ Max Kass 💚 Фотографа @Brashendash и видеографа @Darii_H (она же автор Aftermove) 💚 @nikshapes и @nastya_chbens за невероятные мастер-классы 💚 Всех участников и зрителей за доверие и активность Fight!

🔥21❤‍🔥13custom 53010602626468034107

1 Jun 2026, 16:24 UTC288 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Judges Shuffle FIREFOX & CHBENS 📹 @by_dashh Fight!

🤩11custom 53642243623941813548❤‍🔥6custom 53011687792905035896

1 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC254 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Judge Cutting Shapes КАТУШКА 📹 @by_dashh Fight!

🔥21🤩11custom 53010602626468034109

31 May 2026, 17:52 UTC213 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Judge Cutting Shapes CHESTER 📹 @by_dashh Fight!

❤‍🔥12🤩11custom 53123270441959665129

31 May 2026, 10:03 UTC214 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Judge Shuffle STARKILLER 📹 @by_dashh Fight!

❤‍🔥16🔥14🤩9

30 May 2026, 09:23 UTC398 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Judge Cutting Shapes JOKER 📹 @by_dashh Fight!

🔥13🤩7custom 53727998701910374914❤‍🔥2

29 May 2026, 10:42 UTC498 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Judge Shuffle KALOSH 📹 @by_dashh Fight!

🔥14❤‍🔥10custom 53100414258097979465custom 53727998701910374911

28 May 2026, 15:51 UTC240 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Номинация Debut 😍 Благодарим @KaterinLAB за помощь в съемке выходов 👉 https://disk.yandex.ru/a/uLBqwUHHRN6luw

custom 537279987019103749110❤‍🔥9🤩7custom 53123270441959665124🔥2

28 May 2026, 14:50 UTC451 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Judge Cutting Shapes NIKSHAPES 📹 @by_dashh Fight!

❤‍🔥17custom 537279987019103749113🤩12custom 53010602626468034101custom 53641317457194143761

28 May 2026, 09:04 UTC341 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Готовы видео с Round One Battle 🔥 При публикации не забывайте отмечать аккаунты мероприятия и видеографа video_by_dash 📹 👉 https://disk.yandex.ru/d/12mEFXeJbet1cg

❤‍🔥12🔥11🤩10

21 May 2026, 10:00 UTC287 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kineticflowshuffleVideo

Пробуем новый формат, мини влог с батлов round one battle Спасибо всем кто разделял с нами этот день, спасибо организаторам за доверие ❤️ Буду всем благодарен за поддержку 🥹

❤‍🔥11🤩11custom 53642243623941813547

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @round1ne. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Round One Battle” (@round1ne), 272 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/round1ne.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.