ребята срочные новости
😁10

Channel
@rothenberger
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001613381708 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rothenberger |
| Description | Пишу |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rothenberger |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 39 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 39 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 26 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (26 January 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 137 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
144 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 70 | 48.6% | |
| 💘 | 12 | 8.33% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 8.33% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 7.64% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 6.94% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 5.56% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 4.86% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 3.47% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 2.78% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 2.78% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.694% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rothenberger. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 January 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ребята срочные новости
😁10
Для чего я это написал. Эта "ситуация" меня остановила, заморозила, замедлила, сделала уязвимым. Я долго ее проживал. Она изменила мой взгляд на людей. На врачей. На свое тело. Я стал самым настоящим биохакером. Из-за уязвимости, я воспринимал эту ситуацию как слабость. Ну типо, у многих такое не случается, а вот у меня случилось. Я прятал свой шрам, мне стыдно было НУ КОРОЧЕ, чтобы меня это не тормозило, я просто …
❤11
В прошлом году, мне диагностировали рак щитовидной железы. За неделю-две, до того как я первый раз пошел к врачу, мне приснилась раковая клетка. После этого у меня поднялась тревога жестко. На мой день рождения, в 30 лет, я почувствовал себя хреново, поднялось давление, был панос. Это все не связано с раком, скорей мой организм так мне сигнализировал. Через несколько дней я пошел к терапевту и она сказала че пришел? …
❤10
Video, posted without a caption
как легко переводить текст не переключаясь оказывается
❤2
Видео про самую выгодную стратегию жизни. Теория игр, математика. И в том числе про этот репост https://youtu.be/IOfxvsdBpDQ?si=RnHnUTQS_MAJA0Ga
❤2
Решение всего одной проблемы бы изменило наш мир: Мы тратим так много времени чтобы понять кто есть кто на самом деле. В отношениях, в бизнесе, в дружбе. Во всём. Потому что часто первичная оценка не верная и не имеет никакой связи с реальностью. Она у нас часто смешена на финансовый и очень поверхностный: мы оцениваем людей по кол ву их денег и атрибутов (машина одежда дом подписчики). И в целом насколько они крас…
❤2💘2👀1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7
Кто в детстве гвозди в розетку совал? Я совал
🤝4💘3❤1
Отмотайте к самому первому посту канала, вот он кстати: https://t.me/rothenberger/7 Там пишу про влияние на нас, наших мыслей, убеждений, ситуаций и так далее. Это для контекста Вчера проводил сессию человеку. Захотел поделиться
❤3⚡2💘2🙏1
Итак, приложение one sec сэкономило за год мне три дня жизни только по ВК. 1333 попыток зайти в приложение 🗿 По инсте почему-то не отображается статистка, но я думаю там еще больше может one sec это приложение, которое открывается при попытке зайти в определенные приложения и показывает экран паузы и надо ждать пару секунд. Ну я прям реально стал меньше заходить «посмотреть рилсы». ВК я в итоге удалил вообще, а в …
❤4
Ехал сегодня в такси, приложение повело таксиста сразу в объезд полу кругом. Он сказал «а чего это так повело, я бы мог вот там по прямой проехать». Чутка проехали, я посмотрел дорогу и маршрут показывает поворот на мост - тоже в объезд. Таксист решил не поворачивать и поехать прямо, до следующего моста. В итоге мы встали в пробку и на 20 минут дольше ехали. Я подумал, что в этом контексте, разработчик приложения эт…
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rothenberger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Александр Ротенбергер” (@rothenberger), 39 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rothenberger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.