Вся в работе🫡
custom 546762622403139756414custom 53189240581280560167

Channel
@roteflugel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
464subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002015273001 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roteflugel |
| Created | 26 April 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roteflugel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 464 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 462 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 460 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 463 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 463 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (4 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 281 |
| Reactions total | 65 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
458 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5458422057576460259 | 136 | 29.7% | |
| custom 5467626224031397564 | 132 | 28.8% | |
| custom 5282918917788935437 | 63 | 13.8% | |
| custom 5470174037286084992 | 37 | 8.08% | |
| custom 5318924058128056016 | 31 | 6.77% | |
| custom 5379556596776976890 | 28 | 6.11% | |
| custom 5471927925836114447 | 23 | 5.02% | |
| custom 5454300778757910545 | 6 | 1.31% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.437% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 458reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @roteflugel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вся в работе🫡
custom 546762622403139756414custom 53189240581280560167
Сегодня небольшой крик души ⌨️ Мои черно-белые открытки настолько не пользуются спросом, что я перестала брать их на маркеты Вот ссылка на них кстати: https://t.me/roteflugel/757?single А между тем это буквально номер 1 в моем творчестве, а ведь многие даже не знают... Кто-то считает, что вышить маленький кулон сложнее, чем нарисовать целую иллюстрацию одними штрихами и точками. Так вот это не так. Я научилась вы…
custom 528291891778893543720custom 546762622403139756415custom 53189240581280560167custom 54584220575764602592
Video, posted without a caption
custom 546762622403139756420custom 52829189177889354379custom 54543007787579105454custom 53189240581280560162
✨Вчера был красивый закат, а у меня красивое обновлённое рабочее место✨ Так что вайбуем 🤩 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
custom 545842205757646025938custom 546762622403139756415custom 53189240581280560166
Фанфакт: я не считаю, что хорошо рисую, потому что училась в художественном лицее и была там буквально худшей в классе. Поэтому я чувствую разницу между "рисовать лучше большинства" и "хорошо рисовать". Так что когда меня хвалят, я чувствую себя таким импостером :0 (но вы все равно хвалите, надо поддерживать имидж художника)
custom 528291891778893543729custom 545842205757646025916👎2custom 53189240581280560162custom 54543007787579105452custom 54676262240313975642custom 54719279258361144471
Первый день DiceFest прошёл отлично, всем спасибо ❤ Отдельное спасибо всем, кто рассказывал анекдоты этому клоуну, я правильно понимаю, что это теперь новое лицо бренда?🤡
custom 537955659677697689023custom 54584220575764602595custom 53189240581280560162
Новые блокноты с вышивкой, которые будут на DiceFest и Маркете на Неве уже завтра
custom 545842205757646025920custom 54701740372860849927custom 54676262240313975646custom 53189240581280560162
Время качественного контента :> Олдскулы сводит? Напоминаю, что уже послезавтра первый день Dice Fest VI на Чкаловской, и тема в этот раз... 🤡 Цирк 🤡 🤩 на 🤩 🌿болоте🌿 https://vk.ru/dicefest2026
custom 547017403728608499210custom 53795565967769768905custom 54719279258361144473custom 52829189177889354372custom 54676262240313975641
Ало да, я безработная, все пока, не могу разговаривать Извините, это повторится. (я просто хочу поделиться, но у меня нет личного канала, терпим)
custom 546762622403139756427custom 545842205757646025918custom 547017403728608499213custom 53189240581280560161
Вот вам скриншот рилса с красивой музыкой, а то не нашла в видеоредакторе нужный трек. Не благодарите, качественный контент всегда здесь с нами🫡
custom 547192792583611444719custom 54584220575764602599custom 54676262240313975644
Одна из самых популярных позиций: 🍎кулон с мотыльком🦋🍎 И поэтому я решила сделать его ещё красивее и повесить на чокер в серебряной и золотой оправе* Другие кулоны также доступны для заказа на чокерах🌟 Какой вам нравится больше? *Конечно имеется в виду цвет "серебро" и "золото", я не миллионер
custom 545842205757646025919custom 54676262240313975648custom 52829189177889354373
🌟Украшения в наличии сегодня🌟 🍎⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🍎 А если вы не нашли ничего для себя, всегда можно сделать индивидуальный заказ по тем же расценкам или сделать повтор любого изделия из канала🍒
custom 546762622403139756420custom 54584220575764602599custom 54701740372860849927custom 53189240581280560162
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @roteflugel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,512,755 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Воронье Подворье | вышивка и иллюстрация” (@roteflugel), 464 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roteflugel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.