Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ростов сегодня

Channel

Ростов сегодня

@rostoday

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,901subscribers

-166 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001240839721
TypeChannel
Username@rostoday
DescriptionКанал о Ростове и ростовчанах По всем вопросам: @contactonn Биржа: https://telega.in/c/rostoday РКН: https://clck.ru/3GLAdM
Created4 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/rostoday

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 10 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@banki_oil/5205617 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC@rostoday/53251 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC0.9872 seconds
@banki_oil/5180611 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC@rostoday/53125 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC0.984 minutes
@banki_oil/5236424 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC@rostoday/53393 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 04:44 UTC0.972 minutes
@banki_oil/5252827 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC@rostoday/53495 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC0.9775 minutes
@banki_oil/5620210 Nov 2026, 09:14 UTC@rostoday/55079 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 17:47 UTC0.978.6 hours
@banki_oil/516858 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC@rostoday/53031 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC0.9758 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@banki_oil13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9722 minutes@banki_oil (13–0)
@economica12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.941.9 hours@economica (12–0)
@donvesti29 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (28–1)
@DMaxnoVosti8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0067 minutesthis entry (5–3)
@realjournal8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.7 hourseven
@streetwall5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9823 minutes@streetwall (4–1)
@rostovrnd5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.992.0 hours@rostovrnd (3–2)
@bloknot_rostov5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9861 minutes@bloknot_rostov (5–0)
@moscowmap5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0034 minutes@moscowmap (5–0)
@kalitvatoday6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (4–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 48 of the 50 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 528 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @rostoday — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

10,90111,06710,9846 August 2026 — 11,067 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,066 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,063 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,062 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,054 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,050 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,048 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,047 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,043 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,037 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,035 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,038 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,033 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,029 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,025 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,024 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,028 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,027 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,031 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,021 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,018 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,014 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,012 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,006 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,003 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,001 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,000 subscribers1 October 2026 — 10,980 subscribers6 October 2026 — 10,968 subscribers10 October 2026 — 10,959 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,957 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,955 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,954 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,949 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,947 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,941 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,940 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,939 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,935 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,933 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,932 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,931 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,927 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,925 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,924 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,922 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,917 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,912 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,909 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,910 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,907 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,905 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,902 subscribers9 November 2026 — 10,903 subscribers11 November 2026 — 10,901 subscribers6 August 202611 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 97 days, net -166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,876–11,092 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 15:2110,901-2
9 Nov 2026, 18:1910,903+1
8 Nov 2026, 13:1610,902-3
7 Nov 2026, 08:2910,905-2
6 Nov 2026, 11:2610,907-3
5 Nov 2026, 13:2510,910+1
4 Nov 2026, 12:2610,909-3
3 Nov 2026, 14:5110,912-5
2 Nov 2026, 13:1510,917-5
31 Oct 2026, 10:2810,922-2
30 Oct 2026, 09:2010,924-1
29 Oct 2026, 07:4710,925-2
28 Oct 2026, 07:3110,927-4
27 Oct 2026, 10:3510,931-1
26 Oct 2026, 09:3610,932-1
24 Oct 2026, 11:0810,933-2
23 Oct 2026, 09:3010,935-4
22 Oct 2026, 07:2610,939-1
21 Oct 2026, 01:3110,940-1
20 Oct 2026, 00:5610,941first reading

Engagement

666 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.69%
avg views ÷ 10,901 subscribers
Avg views / post
402
254 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.491%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
254
of 666 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 77 of 254 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held666 (5 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total102,151
Reactions total169
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 11:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,800
Videos
≈4,560
Links
≈8,080

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
59m 14s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 100 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

721 reactions across 231 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎14520.1%
❤12717.6%
😡9513.2%
😱8712.1%
👍598.18%
😢425.83%
🤣425.83%
😁405.55%
🤔141.94%
🤯141.94%
👏111.53%
💯111.53%
🙏111.53%
😭91.25%
🔥70.971%
👌20.277%
😈20.277%
😨20.277%
🎉10.139%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 268 of the 666 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 737 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 666 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
0.751%
5 of 666 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
5
posts carrying an erid · 5 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
353
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
500
over 661 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VSb5zEWsXx114 August 202614 August 2026
2VtzqwQAfNs124 August 202624 August 2026
2W5zFGDxba9127 August 202627 August 2026
2W5zFHkfzsC19 November 20269 November 2026
2W5zFK1C5sf125 August 202625 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 666 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 254 posts held from the last 30 days (4.72%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC10 viewsread 13 November 2026

79% россиян начали экономить на еде или тщательнее планировать покупки, показало исследование. А 61% из них перешли на товары по акциям и скидкам.

13 Nov 2026, 10:45 UTC76 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

На Дону полиция изъяла более 12 тонн контрафактного алкоголя и почти 39 тысяч пачек нелегальных сигарет. Возбудили восемь уголовных дел. В Ростове и Мясниковском районе закрыли два подпольных цеха, а в Каменском районе изъяли более 8,5 тысячи бутылок суррогата.

13 Nov 2026, 10:15 UTC133 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Укладка асфальта во время дождя — давняя ростовская традиция. Отметим, что ГОСТ не запрещает работы во время осадков.

👏1

13 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC146 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

На Ленина в Ростове затопило подземный переход. Местами вода поднялась до щиколоток. По прогнозу, дождь в городе будет идти весь день.

13 Nov 2026, 09:18 UTC240 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

В ближайшие дни погода в Ростове ухудшится: синоптики снова обещают мощный ливень и усиление ветра до 23 м/с.

13 Nov 2026, 09:03 UTC342 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

Во время атаки БПЛА в Ростове повреждены девять многоквартирных домов в Советском и Октябрьском районах. В них ввели режим ЧС. Без отопления остаются 114 домов в Октябрьском районе. В 79 из них тепло обещают вернуть в ближайшее время. Подачу воды на котельную восстановили, система наполняется. Ещё 35 домов остаются без тепла из-за повреждения воздушной теплотрассы.

13 Nov 2026, 08:44 UTC294 viewsread 13 November 2026

Четыре человека погибли при атаке на Волгоградскую область, ещё двое госпитализированы. Об этом сообщил губернатор региона Андрей Бочаров. Все погибшие и пострадавшие — сотрудники южной промзоны Волгограда.

13 Nov 2026, 08:13 UTC339 views2 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Тысячи жителей Военведа в Ростове остались без отопления после ночной атаки БПЛА. Из-за повреждения коммуникаций приостановили подачу воды на котельную на улице Гагринской. Специалисты уже устраняют неисправность. Отопление планируют восстановить до 17:00 13 ноября.

😱2

13 Nov 2026, 07:45 UTC359 viewsread 13 November 2026

Мужчина ранен из-за ночного обстрела БПЛА Ростовской области. Его госпитализировали медики. Всего в Ростове повреждены пять домов. Для жителей многоэтажки в Октябрьском районе открыли пункты временного размещения.

13 Nov 2026, 07:23 UTC406 viewsread 13 November 2026

На Вятской в Ростове перекрыли проезд к кольцу на Штахановского из-за огромной лужи — в ней застряла машина. Водители также советуют не ехать по улице Оганова на автомобилях с низкой посадкой — там тоже большие лужи.

13 Nov 2026, 07:16 UTC419 views2 reactionsread 13 November 2026

РКН усилил блокировки с помощью ИИ, пишет Forbes. Новые алгоритмы будут точнее выявлять запрещённый контент, VPN-сервисы и способы обхода блокировок. Эксперты предупреждают, что из-за ошибок под раздачу могут попасть обычные сайты и корпоративные сервисы. На умную фильтрацию Рунета потратили 2,2 млрд рублей.

👎2

13 Nov 2026, 07:14 UTC423 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Две легковые и автобус столкнулись перед Ворошиловским мостом. Автомобили перекрыли три ряда. Пробка в обе стороны растянулась до микрорайона Северный в Батайске.

😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 666 posts we hold for @rostoday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

РОСТОВ | СОБЫТИЯ | НОВОСТИ
@Rostov_nov · 22,782
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
Подслушано Ростов-на-Дону
@rostov0 · 116,630
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
Че по Ростову?💤
@cheRostov · 28,117
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
Афиша Ростов | Новые заведения в Ростове-на-Дону
@afisha_rostov1 · 50,545
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
RostovGazeta.ru | Ростовская область
@RostovInside · 18,741
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 October 2026
Новости Ростова - Rostovnews61
@rostovnews61 · 40,796
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Блокнот Ростов
@bloknot_rostov · 40,040
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
MDK Ростов
@MDK_RnD · 24,309
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Новости Ростова и Области
@rostov_smi · 151,267
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
Жесть Ростов
@zhest_rostov_161 · 32,440
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Ростов №1
@rstv01 · 32,008
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
РОСТОВ ПАПА РОСТОВ-НА-ДОНУ
@rostovrnd · 31,410
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
Бесплатный Ростов
@rostov_afisha · 36,152
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
ГЛАВНЫЕ НОВОСТИ РОСТОВА - НА - ДОНУ РОСТОВ ВКУРСЕ
@vkurserostov · 24,196
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
Новости Ростова-на-Дону
@rnd_my · 86,198
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Privet-Rostov.ru - новости Ростов-на-Дону
@privet_rostov_ru · 176,415
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
РОСТОВ ГЛАВНЫЙ - РОСТОВ НОВОСТИ - 161
@rostov_glavniy · 286,838
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
ЭТО РОСТОВ, ДЕТКА! 💎
@etorostov_tg · 21,762
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
РОСТОВ ГЛАВНЫЙ новости
@glavnyi_rostov · 70,716
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
Ростов Главный
@rostovnadonuvk · 20,205
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 September 2026
Телеблог Ростов Таганрог Шахты Волгодонск Новочеркасск Батайск Новошахтинск Азов Реклама Афиша Объявления Аренда квартиры
@Volgodonsk_Novocherkassk24 · 58,623
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
АО "Донэнерго" Отключения
@ao_donenergo · 37,818
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
Ростов.ком PRO
@rostov_compro · 20,091
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 September 2026
М4 ДОН
@m4_don_kanal · 24,519
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ростов сегодня” (@rostoday), 10,901 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rostoday.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.