Going to be testing out this Trojans Dex for trading The OG trading bot Like + RT + signup Will be giving away the first weeks ref $ to 3 of you https://x.com/roshicrypto8/status/2010806245566054823?s=20 SIGNUP: trojan.com/@Roshi
β€6

Channel
@roshidegen
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
1,027subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002059714992 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roshidegen |
| Description | Welcome to Regas (Roshi + Vegas) = Regas π° Casino channel where we hit 100x or 0 High risk - High reward sers Invest what u would put on red in Vegas. nfa π°π°π° |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roshidegen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 1,027 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 1,027 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 March 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 8 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
354 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 204 | 57.6% | |
| π₯ | 76 | 21.5% | |
| π | 26 | 7.34% | |
| π | 22 | 6.21% | |
| πΎ | 9 | 2.54% | |
| π | 5 | 1.41% | |
| π | 3 | 0.847% | |
| π³ | 3 | 0.847% | |
| π₯° | 2 | 0.565% | |
| β | 1 | 0.282% | |
| π | 1 | 0.282% | |
| π | 1 | 0.282% | |
| π«‘ | 1 | 0.282% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 354reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2025 to 12 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @roshidegen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 March 2025 to 12 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Going to be testing out this Trojans Dex for trading The OG trading bot Like + RT + signup Will be giving away the first weeks ref $ to 3 of you https://x.com/roshicrypto8/status/2010806245566054823?s=20 SIGNUP: trojan.com/@Roshi
β€6
I hope yβall made some cash with shrek. Volume on eth is so bad yet this went to 800k Clean 5-6x I didnβt sell close to top because IM still a believer in hold and build rather than buy and flip for fast profits 2x on my challenge wallet total Could have been more but long term I expect this strat to work in my favor
π₯5β€3πΎ2
π Shrek Whale Buy! π ππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππππ π Spent $3,064.38 (0.991 ETH) π Got 3,954,887,719,601 SHREK π€ Buyer / TX π Wallet Value $58,832 πͺ Position +46% πΈ Market Cap $351,820 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending βΊ #11 On ETH Trending π₯
β€9
In hindsight that dip was a blessing I didnβt manage to get in at bottom but got a bag at 110k Sexy start to the challenge
π₯7β€3π1
Currently sitting at $2k Could have sold at the top but I have the tendency to bag ride to Valhalla or to zero Iβve taken initials only. Gonna buy the dip if we see under 150k. Leaving rest to the trenches gods Gonna keep bag working Only the beginning of the $100k journey
π₯8π2
So far so good We are going higher imo Og meme, very recognizable
π₯7β€4
Next destination All time highs
β€9π₯2
Itβs on ETH You can use uniswap Gmgn Or this tg bot https://t.me/maestro?start=r-degenroshii I personally trade old school using phantom wallet and uniswap because I hold longer term on eth plays
π₯6β€5π1
No time for sleep I keep raiding, shilling and pushing A close above this line here gives even more bullish momentum Higher for Shrek 0x77f6E975aA520601236f61C81ca8A88e2C3Cc1A9
β€7π2π₯°1
Photo, posted without a caption
β€7π₯3π2
Volume looking better on chain Soβ¦ Loaded up a wallet with $1k Goal: $100k profit in the next 3 months I sniped $Shrek around 150k mc Took initials only. The meme speaks for itself. OG worldwide know meme. It can spread like wildfire, easy to market. Iβm going to be bagworking for this one
π₯4β€3π1
Yo
π22β€8π4π1π₯1π«‘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @roshidegen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βRoshi Degen π°β (@roshidegen), 1,027 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roshidegen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.