Channel
@rosethyr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002241884456 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rosethyr |
| Created | 30 June 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rosethyr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 21 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 21 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 30 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (30 June 2024 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 149 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🍡ㅤ𝖥𝗐𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝖨’𝗅𝗅 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗅𝖽𝖾𝗋 ✨ ㅤ𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝖺𝗇 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖽 𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗌 ㅤㅤㅤ𝗐𝗁𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 𝗌𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾 ㅤ𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗒𝗈𝗎 🦊 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝗃𝗈𝗂𝗇 𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 : @wisfleu ㅤ𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍 : 𝖴𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗅 𝖳𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖺𝗒 𝖺𝗍 𝟣𝟤
Signed pauli
چلنج کنسله پاکش کردم خواستید لفت بدید
Signed pauli
خخ فورینا
Signed pauli
ㅤׅㅤ 𝇄𝇄 🎤 𝑁𝖾𝗐💅🤩𝗁𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖾 🤩 ! 𝖥𝗋𝗐𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 ⏜⌣ ֹ ꫶ 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗅 𝗆𝖾 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝖿𝖺𝗏𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗇 𝖨'𝗅𝗅 𝗀𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗇 𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖺 𝗐𝗈𝗋𝖽 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝗇 🎤🎤 🎤🎤🎤 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗈𝗌𝖾. 𝖳𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾'𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗌𝗈 𝖺 𝖿𝗎𝗇 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝗁𝗂𝖽𝖽𝖾𝗇 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖾— ☁️ 𝗒𝗈𝗎'𝗅𝗅 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖽 𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖽 יִ יִ 𝖬𝖺𝗄𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗈 𝗃𝗈𝗂𝗇 — 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗍𝖾🚫
Signed pauli
Video, posted without a caption
Signed pauli
only to find themselves lost in all they discover
Signed pauli
jewels drawn by the same hunger for knowledge
Signed pauli
you can keep asking me questions, rysellebot i don't mind. curious to know me a little better? lumio.ris might be a good place to start. and if you're just looking to kill some time, 769564085 (GI) is always there for a game or two
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @rosethyr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 724,873 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Séraphine” (@rosethyr), 21 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rosethyr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.