Channel
@roseshill
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
427subscribers
+255 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003631165080 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roseshill |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roseshill |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 6 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 01:09 | 427 | +53 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 374 | +28 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 10:09 | 346 | +10 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 336 | +23 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 22:39 | 313 | +85 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 228 | +54 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 174 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 172 | no change |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:47 | 172 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
11 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 10 | 90.9% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
JADI INI TUH TADI AKU UDAH FULLPAY KE SELLERNYA cuman ternyata akun sellernya belum v2l juga, akhirnya sellernya nanyain mau coba sistem lepas pasang atau pindahin gak? Kalo kenapa-kenapa sellernya yang tanggung jawab, akhirnya aku jawab kalo aku sebenarnya takut tapi kalo mau coba pindahin boleh aja. Sellernya udaah lepas tapi limit jadi harus nunggu 15 menit dulu. Pas nunggu aku juga tadi nyoba kok di PU belum bisa…
(HELP FORWARD.) Hi tolong bantu subs @jjngian dong dan pasang dn 'Return @jjngian to @WhatIsOnEarth.' aku kecolongan username huhuhu. Buat proof nya ada di sini yaa @jjngianproof. Thankyoou so muuuch 🥺
Have a lovely Sundaaayyy. Check username yang ada di atas yukkk, banyak username cantik, ganteng, dan username pacar kalian juga tuh nunggu di bawa pulang. Yuk yuk @bolehjajan @bolehbapul @bolehtanyadulu @bolehbeli @bolehborong @bolehambilsemua @bolehlangsungtake @boleh
💕
👀
👀
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ monsoon bearing forth love marks of @ometga's coming offered unto eyes to behold. ㅤ
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ monsoon bearing forth love marks of @ppharita's coming offered unto eyes to behold. ㅤ
💘3🍓1
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ memories stamped upon a rose, @.jufgian carried by fortune / pieces of sound lingered. ♥️ ㅤ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @roseshill. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@roseshill named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ROSESHILL.” (@roseshill), 427 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roseshill.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.