Channel
@rosesarerosieeeeeeee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5,083subscribers
+122 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003704410637 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rosesarerosieeeeeeee |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rosesarerosieeeeeeee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 5,083 | -77 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 5,160 | -51 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 5,211 | +10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 5,201 | +83 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 5,118 | +157 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 4,961 | first reading |
83 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 81 of 82 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 83 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 29,763 |
| Reactions total | 4,840 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,840 reactions across 81 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,589 | 53.5% | |
| 💘 | 650 | 13.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 446 | 9.21% | |
| 🔥 | 277 | 5.72% | |
| 🥰 | 144 | 2.98% | |
| 💋 | 115 | 2.38% | |
| 🍓 | 101 | 2.09% | |
| 😭 | 94 | 1.94% | |
| custom 5424621601259813757 | 64 | 1.32% | |
| 🤣 | 56 | 1.16% | |
| 🤪 | 56 | 1.16% | |
| 😍 | 51 | 1.05% | |
| 😁 | 41 | 0.847% | |
| 🤯 | 39 | 0.806% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 0.372% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 0.207% | |
| 💅 | 9 | 0.186% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 0.186% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 0.186% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 0.124% | |
| 25 further kinds | 56 | 1.16% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,840reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rosesarerosieeeeeeee. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 83 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
‼️ ДО УДАЛЕНИЯ НАШИХ КАНАЛОВ ОСТАЛСЯ 1 ЧАС ты успел подписаться??? 😶🌫️ ❕ ITZY ❕ BLACKPINK ❕ BTS ⚜️ ФАНФИКИ ⚜️ ENHYPEN ❕ К-ПОП ❕ КОРЕЯ ⚜️ K-DRAMA ⚜️ SKZ ⚜️ TXT
❤1
⏰ на всякий случай напоминаем ‼️ 👀 мега с каналами всё ещё доступна — загляни, пока не закрыли 👍 💌 лучшее для стей > @STRAYKIDS 💌 все для мидии > @ITZY 💌 каналы для моа > @TXT 💌 любителям bts > @BTS 💌 для истинных блинков > @BLACKPINK 💌 фанаты enhypen > @ENHYPEN 💌 дорамы и лакорны > @DORAMA 💌 топ к-поп группы > @K-POP 💌 лучшие фф каналы > @FANFIC 💌 все про Корею > @KOREA 🩷🩵🩷
❤2💘1
⚠️ВНИМАНИЕ К ДЕТАЛЯМ: если ты сейчас открыл эту подборку — 🥸 закрывай её сразу 👎 там есть на что посмотреть и подписаться 😐 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤⤵️ 🤩 𝙁𝘼𝙉𝙁𝙄𝘾 - фанфики bts 🤩 ты до сих пор не нашел каналы с фф по бтс? тогда это твой шанс подписаться на каналы с разными фф ппейрингами, и окунуться в мир с лучшими, романтичными, горячие фанфиками😬жми 🌟 ITZY - уголок для мидзи 🤩 для мидзи мы нашли все л…
❤2
Небольшое пояснение по голосованию за Розэ в “Top 100 – K-Pop Female Vocalists” на Dabeme. Точной даты окончания текущего этапа организаторы не указали. Голосование проходит в несколько раундов на выбывание: каждый день участницы с наименьшим количеством голосов покидают голосование, и так будет продолжаться до определения финалисток. Поэтому сейчас особенно важно поддерживать Розэ и голосовать каждый день, чтобы о…
❤28custom 54246216012598137578💘4🥰1
Друзья,Розэ на втором месте, давайте поднимем её на первое ! Голосовать можно неограниченное количество раз
💘41❤23❤🔥3🔥2
🖤 - Розэ номинирована в категории «Лучший женский вокалист». ~ Проголосовать можно тут. Cr Yoon_min21 @rosesarerosieeeeeeee
❤64❤🔥10💘8🍓1🥰1
Сотрудники YG поделились закулисными фотографиями и видео со съёмок клипов BLACKPINK за последние 10 лет! Cr yk2aii, angel_eugeniya @rosesarerosieeeeeeee
💘44❤18💋5❤🔥1
Дженни планирует выпустить новую песню!
❤13❤🔥1💋1💘1🥴1
𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐉𝐄𝐍𝐍𝐈𝐄 𝐂𝐇𝐑𝐎𝐍𝐈𝐂𝐋𝐄𝐒 — лучший информационный канал, посвященный Дженни Ким. Тут тебя ждёт: 🌟 Самое свежее и проверенное 🌟 Чарты, рекорды и достижения 🌟 Поддержка и защита 🌟 Редкие фото и эксклюзивы 🌟 Переводы и инсайды Здесь Дженни всегда в центре внимания.
💘18❤9❤🔥5
Эксклюзивные фотки Розэ для Levi’s Cr katgwwl @rosesarerosieeeeeeee
🤪55❤28🤣16💘5😁2❤🔥1💋1
📷Обновление истории Розэ в Instagram Cr mirarubyjane_rosie @rosesarerosieeeeeeee
❤67❤🔥7🔥7💘4💋1😁1😍1
Наш чат для общения: https://t.me/+ZeB1IhhZtxM4M2Yy
Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @rosesarerosieeeeeeee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ребята, расскажите, нам интересно узнать.. вы блинки или number уаны?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
хотите ли вы,чтобы мы завтра провели с вами игру? про Розэ
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 184,097 of 1,570,256entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 57 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@rosesarerosieeeeeeee named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rosé and roses” (@rosesarerosieeeeeeee), 5,083 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rosesarerosieeeeeeee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.