Channel
@ropexchange
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
164subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001926909880 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ropexchange |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ropexchange |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 164 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 162 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 162 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (20 June 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,108 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 92.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Wir freuen uns Euch unseren Programm vorzustellen. Weitestgehend ist es auf Euren Rückmeldungen bei der Anmeldung entstanden und das Teams vor Ort freut sich auf Eure Wünsche einzugehen. Entsprechend kann sich das Programm auch nochmals durch Eure Ideen und Rückmeldungen etwas ändern :) Freut euch auf eine tolle gemeinsame Zeit.
Die Situation ist erschütternd und viele vermissen noch immer ihnen wichtige Menschen. Die Polizei Berlin hat eine Rufnummer eingerichtet für Rückfragen: 030 8485 4460 Telefonseelsorge: 0800 1110111 / 0800 1110222 Krisenchat für Teens und junge Erwachsene: +49 157 35 99 81 43 Solltet ihr selber homo- oder transphobe Gewalt, Diskriminierung, antisemitische Vorfälle oder andere Ausprägungen von Menschenhass erfahr…
❤5
Keeping your bunny on the floor. Safe. Long. Escapeproofed. Wie können wir unsere Bunnies langzeit auf dem Boden halten, ohne dass sie groß wegkommen, wegrobben oder ähnliches? HogTie, EbiTie und einiges mehr. Welche Wege kennen wir? Wie sind da die Risikoprofile und wie kann man es lange (über Stunden) aushalten? Oder wie kann man sie innerhalb von wenigen Stunden zum Aufgeben zwingen? Workshop von Pup Trooper auf…
🔥1
Zeit für sapphische Intimität. Raum für echte Verbindungen ... ... mit und ohne Seil. Menschen, mit denen du gemeinsam Nähe schaffst - durch gemeinsames Lernen, Fesseln und Erfahrungen. Ein traumhafter Ort, der dich zum Fliegen einlädt (sinn- und bildlich gesproch). Wo du dich durch Seile und Menschen gehalten fühlen darfst. Das ist was unser Team für die sapphic ropeXchange plant, einer ropeXchange für (Cis- und …
❤1
Ich freue mich euch unser Programm für die menXchange (7.-9. August'26 in Berlin) vorzustellen. Da wir in den kleinen Gruppen immer ein bisschen mehr Flexibilität halten wollen, haben wir es sehr großzügig geplant und können auch vor Ort noch neue Optionen einbringen. Eventtickets und mehr Infos gibt es hier: https://ropexchange.com/
Join Dan for at the menXchange for a deep dive into full-body rope with probably the most interesting startig points: cock, balls & anus. This workshop explores how to build tension through the entire body while beginning directly at the genitals - creating a continuous line of connection, control, and sensation. We will look at: - Starting knots for Cock, Balls and insertable Anal-Toys - Side-Cuffs-Variations for …
❤6
menXchange, sapphic oder mixed ropeXchange. Was passt am besten zu dir? Alle Infos und Details unter: www.ropexchangen.com
menXchange vom 7.-9. August '26 in Berlin (English below) Ihr habt Lust auf ein Bondage-Wochenende unter Männern*? Eine entspannte Zeit mit Seilen, Jungs und guter Laune? Easy und unkompliziert? Lernen, Lachen, Rumalbern? Dann komm zur menXchange auf einem sehr komfortablen und entspannten Hausboot, der Monoceros in Berlin Spandau. Es gibt spannende Workshops für Einsteiger bis Fortgeschrittene, Private Austausch-R…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ropexchange. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 32,919 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ropeXchange Kanal (🇩🇪/🇬🇧)” (@ropexchange), 164 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ropexchange.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.