Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

نوشته‌های روزبه

@roozbeh_notes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

153subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002089339193
TypeChannel
Username@roozbeh_notes
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/roozbeh_notes

Growth

1537 August 2026 — 153 subscribers8 August 2026 — 153 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 152–154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:15153no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:02153first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
102.3%
avg views ÷ 153 subscribers
Avg views / post
156
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,129
Reactions total86
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
670
Videos
15
Links
269

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3034.9%
🤣2529.1%
👍1820.9%
😁55.81%
💔33.49%
🔥22.33%
🤝22.33%
🥰11.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC68 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/-NJO1aC5VbI?is=75W_Zg5HhCmwpdAI نظر شما چیه عزیزان

5 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC108 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

نکته‌ای که از اتاق فرمان اشاره کردن اینه که معلومم نیست اندازه قمار اعتیادآور باشه. ولی نکته این پست این بود که به خودمون بیایم

😁1

5 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC99 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mindtaleO_O

من می‌دونستم اسکرول کردن چیز بدیه، همچنین می‌دونستم با ترشح دوپامین باعث میشه علاقه‌ام به چیزهای دیگه کم بشه. ولی الان دوتا چیز جدید درباره‌اش یاد گرفته. ۱. اسکرول کردن به اندازه قمار کردن اعتیادآوره. ۲. کسایی که در روز بیشتر از دو ساعت اسکرول می‌کنن سی و پنج درصد کنترل کمتری روی ایمپالس‌های قشر پیش‌پیشانی‌شون دارن. قشر پیش‌پیشانی نقش مهمی در تصمیم‌گیری داره و وقتی کنترلتون رو روی این بخش از دست بگیرین در تصمیم‌گیری

👍4

5 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC114 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

از تامین اجتماعی بزرگتر هم داریم؟ با چند ده میلیون کاربر وضعیت UXش اینه؟😂

😁4

5 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC115 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

راننده اسنپ امروزم گفت «چون دختره خوشگله که تو خیابون براش بوق زدم، سوار نشد، تو رو کنسل نکردم». خانم هرجا هستی خدا خیرت بده😂

🤣17

5 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC119 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

من نظرم با آقای پاول یکی نیست ولی. گفته ما خوب مدیریت کردیم ولی همچین خبری هم نیست. روزی ده نفر عضو چنل میشن که بیان تو کامنت ها چرت و پرت بگذارن. پروفایل هاشون نامناسبه، بیو هاشون لینکه به صفحات « فقط طرفدار » و اینا. اگه عضویت تو گروه بدون approve رو اجازه بدم، خودتون می‌بینید.

👍4🤝2

5 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC99 viewsread 8 August 2026

Last night, Apple briefly removed Telegram from the App Store because a single user had planted illegal pornographic content in a public group chat. ⬅️ Telegram was restored within hours. But I want to explain what happened — to warn other app developers and help protect online communities from similar attacks. 🧹Because Telegram quickly removes illegal content from public groups using all kinds of moderation tools,

4 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC104 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

این Chatgpt میگه طبیعیه، ولی گفتم تجربه شما رو هم بپرسم

2

4 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC104 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

بچه ها من یخ فلزی گرفتم ولی حتی وقتی طولانی تو فریزر بوده و در میاد، خیلی سرد نیست😂 طبیعیه؟ شما تجربه مشابه دارید؟ یخ استیل مکعبی ۸ عددی https://torob.com/p/639d664a-7a24-4815-b750-54e275a34f03/

🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC342 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

یاد بعضی نفرات روشنم می دارد. قوتم می بخشد، راه می اندازد، و اجاق ِکهن ِسردِ سرایم گرم می آید از گرمی ِعالی دم شان. نام بعضی نفرات رزق روحم شده است. وقت هر دل تنگی سوی شان دارم دست جراتم می بخشد روشنم می دارد. نیما یوشیج

5💔3

4 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC104 viewsread 8 August 2026

امروز این شعره افتاده تو مغزم، دوست داشتم با شما هم سهیم بشم:

3 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC110 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

خریدار پرینتری که تو دیوار اگهی کردیم، ساعت ۹ شب زنگ زد که میام چک میکنم و بخرم. بعد یه ربع زنگ زد که فکر کنم نرم افزارش رو باید نصب کنم؟ پس ولش کن. حالا نرم‌افزار که نمی‌خواد ولی اینقدر هم حوصله نداشتی ستون؟ خوابت میاد؟😂

🤣8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @roozbeh_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 994,625 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نوشته‌های روزبه” (@roozbeh_notes), 153 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roozbeh_notes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.