Channel
@rooms_kyiv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,367subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001354771660 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rooms_kyiv |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rooms_kyiv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 1,367 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 1,366 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 1,364 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 1,363 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
✅ Безкоштовна підписка Хто готовий залетіти на тест - драйв нової підписки пишіть сюди @AlexRooms1
Як вам така ідея
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А як вам така підписка: Ми надаємо вам просто помічника, де він: 1. Перевірить власника в реєстрі, а також через відкриті джерела. (Соціальні мережі і тд) 2. Візьме на себе переговори та дзвінки. Торг. 3. Зробить договір. В кінці ви отримаєте безпечну угоду. Ми готові запустити таку послугу безкоштовно на 3 місяці
То яка цінність посередницьких послуг на вашу думку має бути
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Але ж є сервіси такі як ЛУН, Bird, OLX. Ви щодня шукаєте житло самостійно, ви прагнете обійти рієлтора.
Дивіться, ми хочемо створити новий продукт. Проводимо опитування. Що для вас важливо при роботі з рієлтором або з любим іншим посередником
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Тук тук є пару питань
Персональний підбір житла Заселимо в квартиру швидко та без надокучливих дзвінків. 🔸Розсилка квартир без комісійних 📞 Дзвінки та комунікація з власниками на нас. ⚡️ Перевірка квартири та власника на нас 📂 Договір зробимо! Цікаво? Подавай заявку тут: @AlexRooms1
Рієлтори взагалі потрібні ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rooms_kyiv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Як вам така ідея
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
То яка цінність посередницьких послуг на вашу думку має бути
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Дивіться, ми хочемо створити новий продукт. Проводимо опитування. Що для вас важливо при роботі з рієлтором або з любим іншим посередником
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Рієлтори взагалі потрібні ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2022 to 17 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 502,643 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@rooms_kyiv named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rooms Київ, без рієлторів” (@rooms_kyiv), 1,367 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rooms_kyiv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.