Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Roof_TLV | Душевные события в Тель-Авиве

@roof_tlv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

11,606subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001178886550
TypeChannel
Username@roof_tlv
Created20 April 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/roof_tlv

Growth

11,58911,60611,597.56 August 2026 — 11,589 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,593 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,600 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,605 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,601 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,603 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,605 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,606 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,586–11,609 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:2511,606+1
12 Aug 2026, 08:0211,605+2
11 Aug 2026, 06:4211,603+2
10 Aug 2026, 05:1811,601-4
9 Aug 2026, 03:5411,605+5
8 Aug 2026, 01:5211,600+7
7 Aug 2026, 03:1511,593+4
6 Aug 2026, 09:1511,589first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.05%
avg views ÷ 11,606 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.462%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held26 (12 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total10,505
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2573.5%
🍾823.5%
👍12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC256 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Терапевтическая группа в нашей студии. Сегодня вечером. Начинаем в 19:00 Мы собираемся для глубокой работы с внутренними состояниями. Здесь можно безопасно выдохнуть после рабочего дня. Камерный формат встреч. В группе действует правило конфиденциальности. Мы детально разбираем актуальные личные запросы участников. Ведущий аккуратно направляет процесс и держит структуру. Вы получаете честную обратную связь от груп

10 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC499 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🌃 БЕГУЩИЙ ПО ЛЕЗВИЮ на крыше В этот четверг Лос-Анджелес будущего. Ночной дождь, неон, гигантские рекламные экраны, летающие машины и люди, которые уже не вполне уверены, что делает человека человеком. 13 августа смотрим на большом экране культовый «Бегущий по лезвию» (1982) - именно Blade Runner: The Final Cut, версию, над которой Ридли Скотт получил полный художественный и монтажный контроль. Харрисон Форд играе

👍1

9 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTCviews —

Roof_TLV | Душевные события в Тель-Авиве pinned a photo

9 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC643 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Расписание: 🙂 09/08 Открытая терапевтическая группа https://www.facebook.com/share/1EWfKWVEqF/ 📚11/08 Совместное чтение и обсуждение. Книжный клуб https://t.me/UgS3EtxOPtsyMDlk 🙂 12/08 Терапевтическая группа https://telegra.ph/Psihoterapevticheskaya-gruppa-05-24 🎫 13/08 Кино на крыше https://www.facebook.com/share/19W4f21ueN/ 🎲 13/08 Вечер настолок https://www.facebook.com/share/1Bka5Bpv3c/ 🪇14/08 5'nizza. Лейб

9 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTCviews —

Roof_TLV | Душевные события в Тель-Авиве pinned «Терапевтическая группа в нашей студии. Сегодня вечером. Начинаем в 19:00 Мы собираемся для глубокой работы с внутренними состояниями. Здесь можно безопасно выдохнуть после рабочего дня. Камерный формат встреч. В группе действует правило конфиденциальности.…»

9 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC477 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Терапевтическая группа в нашей студии. Сегодня вечером. Начинаем в 19:00 Мы собираемся для глубокой работы с внутренними состояниями. Здесь можно безопасно выдохнуть после рабочего дня. Камерный формат встреч. В группе действует правило конфиденциальности. Мы детально разбираем актуальные личные запросы участников. Ведущий аккуратно направляет процесс и держит структуру. Вы получаете честную обратную связь от груп

1

4 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTCviews —

Roof_TLV | Душевные события в Тель-Авиве pinned Deleted message

1 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTCviews —

Roof_TLV | Душевные события в Тель-Авиве pinned a photo

1 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC≈1,360 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Расписание на август: 🙂 02/08 Открытая терапевтическая группа https://www.facebook.com/share/1BiHkd2y2o/ 📚04/08 Совместное чтение и обсуждение. Книжный клуб https://t.me/UgS3EtxOPtsyMDlk/337 🙂 05/08 Терапевтическая группа https://telegra.ph/Psihoterapevticheskaya-gruppa-05-24 🍿06/08 Кино на крыше https://www.facebook.com/share/1EMMUsJ6fA/ 🫟6/08 Вечер х#*вых рисунков https://www.facebook.com/share/1HMKFaTGES/ 🎸0

4

31 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTCviews —

Roof_TLV | Душевные события в Тель-Авиве pinned Deleted message

30 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTCviews —

Roof_TLV | Душевные события в Тель-Авиве pinned Deleted message

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @roof_tlv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@roof_tlv edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 310,407 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Roof_TLV | Душевные события в Тель-Авиве” (@roof_tlv), 11,606 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roof_tlv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.