Photo, posted without a caption
😁29❤5💯3🤨1
Signed Кирилл Жданов

Channel
@ronpodcast
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
915subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001657020669 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ronpodcast |
| Created | 5 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ronpodcast |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 915 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 915 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18,180 |
| Reactions total | 706 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
706 reactions across 20 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 210 | 29.7% | |
| ❤ | 107 | 15.2% | |
| 💯 | 70 | 9.92% | |
| custom 5456371910772269309 | 51 | 7.22% | |
| 👍 | 42 | 5.95% | |
| custom 5456140738452528837 | 36 | 5.10% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 5.10% | |
| custom 5456502344634079449 | 24 | 3.40% | |
| 🫡 | 18 | 2.55% | |
| custom 5456128055414103034 | 16 | 2.27% | |
| 🙉 | 15 | 2.12% | |
| custom 5454053289857393595 | 11 | 1.56% | |
| 👀 | 11 | 1.56% | |
| custom 5453937347215238994 | 10 | 1.42% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 0.992% | |
| 🙈 | 7 | 0.992% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 0.992% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 0.85% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 0.567% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 0.567% | |
| 7 further kinds | 14 | 1.98% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 706reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
😁29❤5💯3🤨1
Signed Кирилл Жданов
Сегодня делаем барную милю
🔥20🏆3🤷♂3❤2
Signed Кирилл Жданов
Быковать на патриотическое кино, ради которого переносили Мстителей народ не решился в свое время, но на Колобке оторвались все по полной программе, конечно. Кстати, вы капец как рады за Журавля? Где ерид, брат
custom 545637191077226930914custom 545614073845252883712custom 54565023446340794499custom 54540532898573935956custom 54539373472152389945
Signed Кирилл Жданов
Вот блин… Друзья, привет! Видим вашу активность вокруг фильма «Последний богатырь. Колобок». Фильм вышел в российский прокат сегодня, но еще до первых сеансов получил за ночь тысячи оценок на Кинопоиске — свыше 90% из них резко негативные. Система распознала такую активность как аномальную, поэтому не учла оценки такого флешмоба. В итоге для формирования рейтинга достаточного количества оценок еще не набралось. Мы…
custom 545637191077226930914custom 545614073845252883710custom 54565023446340794498custom 54539373472152389945custom 54540532898573935955❤4
Signed Кирилл Жданов
Появились строгие правила игры в «Угадай франшизу». Официально разрешено называть новый фильм только «Последний богатырь. Колобок». Все остальное находится под строжайшим запретом: 🔴Не называйте компанию, которая принесла этого колобка. 🔴Забудьте, что вообще существовали предыдущие части. Их не было. Мы не видели этих богатырей. Ни «Корня зла», ни «Посланников тьмы», ни тем более «Финиста». Теперь наш любимый гер…
🙉15🤯4
Signed Кирилл Жданов
Стоило ли троллить фанатов марвел, ахах
😁51
Signed Кирилл Жданов
Photo, posted without a caption
🫡18🙈7💅4
Signed Кирилл Жданов
Тем временем Паук собрал 932 миллиона за первые выходные. Офигеть
❤26🔥16
Signed Кирилл Жданов
А я напоминаю, что просмотр Колобка приравнивается к предательству. https://t.me/garbul/1169
💯32😁6
Signed Кирилл Жданов
Ща будем стрелять вместе, заходите писать гадости
❤15
Signed Кирилл Жданов
А есть у нас тут кто-нибудь, кто может сделать простой дизайн проект для комнаты и подобрать мебель?
❤12
Signed Кирилл Жданов
мой тренер стримит, надо будет с ним пострелять https://www.twitch.tv/koryaga_twitch
👀11👍5custom 54563719107722693092custom 54561280554141030341custom 54561407384525288371
Signed Кирилл Жданов
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ronpodcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Разговоры о неважном” (@ronpodcast), 915 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ronpodcast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.