Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

꒰ ꒰ ꪱׁׁׁׅׅׅ݊ꪀܻ⨍ᨵ꯭ִׁྀིׅׅ̈ꔫܹ

@roniinff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

22subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004418546400
TypeChannel
Username@roniinff
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 3 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/roniinff

Growth

226 August 2026 — 22 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 12:3422no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:0322first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

728 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 538223050597653140319326.5%
custom 520443121224807549613819.0%
custom 520446855269374694212216.8%
custom 520395860263675776812116.6%
custom 5215322188453804524527.14%
custom 5276227062389052778527.14%
custom 5276125061210742822506.87%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 728reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Jul 2026, 14:53 UTC238 views60 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

꒰͡ ͞ ˳ ˖ ⏜⌣ 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩✿ Იິ݃‌‌ִֺྀི⎯ִ𐑼ֺ ۫ 🎀y love groups/singers ꒰࡙ — Папин Олимпос, MAMA RUSSIA, Пошлая Молли, Полматери, Король и шут, 2rbina2rista(от части), LIDA, мзлф, Монеточка, Alex g :: 🌟

custom 520443121224807549621custom 538223050597653140319custom 520446855269374694214custom 52039586026367577686

6 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC230 views44 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @iknowit_cfPhoto

( 🎁 ) — Я знаю, что тру ирл Флаттершай точно существует, ведь это РОНИ !! i know that *** … : @iknowthatexists_bot

custom 538223050597653140316custom 520446855269374694213custom 520443121224807549610custom 52039586026367577685

6 Jul 2026, 00:20 UTC269 views73 reactionsread 11 August 2026

✿॒࣪ ˖ ࣪𓏧֖ᤢ ׁ . . ໒ ‌.‌ ݂ . ‌১ ─͟͟┄ 🎀🎀♡᳚ ::

custom 520443121224807549621custom 520395860263675776819custom 538223050597653140317custom 520446855269374694216

6 Jul 2026, 00:20 UTC268 views74 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

꒰꯭ ׁꢄ ִ 🎀i𐓣𐓣 lis𝐭 ✫࣭࣪🧁 ׁྀི ‌ུ Флаттершай - млп Меркурий - шк Мизуки - секай Эна - секаии Сахароза - генш Амэ Чан - нсо

custom 520395860263675776820custom 520446855269374694219custom 538223050597653140319custom 520443121224807549616

6 Jul 2026, 00:18 UTC256 views73 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🥹 ( ( . . 🎁 | » » @ . 🎀 💕 , , 🌟

custom 520446855269374694220custom 520443121224807549619custom 538223050597653140319custom 520395860263675776815

6 Jul 2026, 00:18 UTC250 views65 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 520446855269374694218custom 520395860263675776817custom 520443121224807549616custom 538223050597653140314

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @roniinff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Jul 2026, 00:08 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

| 🎁 𝗋𖦹ׅ݊͟𝔫𝗂 🥹 𝐢s 🤩

  1. 🤩 | 🎁 :: guilty31%
  2. 🤩 | 🪽 :: innocent69%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTCAnonymous Poll39 voters

🥹 ♡͟⋮ 🔡ho are you ?! 🤍

  1. ─͟͟┄ ִ꒰ 𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖽 ‧₊ ꒱ᩘ8%
  2. ─͟͟┄ ִ꒰ 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋 ‧₊ ꒱ᩘ0%
  3. ─͟͟┄ ִ꒰ 𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗋 ‧₊ ꒱ᩘ38%
  4. ─͟͟┄ ִ꒰ 𝖿𝖺𝗇 ‧₊ ꒱ᩘ41%
  5. ─͟͟┄ ִ꒰ 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝗈𝗎𝗉🤩𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗅 ‧₊ ꒱ᩘ13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 962,999 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“꒰ ꒰ ꪱׁׁׁׅׅׅ݊ꪀܻ⨍ᨵ꯭ִׁྀིׅׅ̈ꔫܹ” (@roniinff), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roniinff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.