Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Romanov Capital

Channel

Romanov Capital

@romcapital

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

54,418subscribers

-755 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001646516786
TypeChannel
Username@romcapital
DescriptionАвторский канал по фондовому рынку и инвестициям По сотрудничеству: @managromanov Для друзей https://t.me/+yaz_14quUFtiZTAy https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67beeba5efb8e83e33d7568e
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/romcapital

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

54,41855,17354,795.57 August 2026 — 55,173 subscribers7 August 2026 — 55,173 subscribers8 August 2026 — 55,160 subscribers9 August 2026 — 55,143 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55,129 subscribers12 August 2026 — 55,124 subscribers13 August 2026 — 55,121 subscribers14 August 2026 — 55,120 subscribers16 August 2026 — 55,127 subscribers17 August 2026 — 55,140 subscribers18 August 2026 — 55,126 subscribers19 August 2026 — 55,099 subscribers20 August 2026 — 55,056 subscribers21 August 2026 — 55,060 subscribers22 August 2026 — 55,081 subscribers24 August 2026 — 55,053 subscribers25 August 2026 — 55,043 subscribers26 August 2026 — 55,026 subscribers27 August 2026 — 55,020 subscribers28 August 2026 — 55,010 subscribers29 August 2026 — 55,013 subscribers30 August 2026 — 55,011 subscribers31 August 2026 — 55,010 subscribers1 September 2026 — 55,003 subscribers2 September 2026 — 54,995 subscribers3 September 2026 — 54,980 subscribers5 September 2026 — 54,975 subscribers9 September 2026 — 54,954 subscribers11 September 2026 — 54,908 subscribers13 September 2026 — 54,574 subscribers15 September 2026 — 54,543 subscribers16 September 2026 — 54,535 subscribers19 September 2026 — 54,486 subscribers26 September 2026 — 54,418 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -755. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,305–55,286 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 08:1554,418-68
19 Sept 2026, 12:1754,486-49
16 Sept 2026, 23:0054,535-8
15 Sept 2026, 02:3854,543-31
13 Sept 2026, 15:0154,574-334
11 Sept 2026, 17:2054,908-46
9 Sept 2026, 01:0154,954-21
5 Sept 2026, 14:4054,975-5
3 Sept 2026, 17:3954,980-15
2 Sept 2026, 08:3354,995-8
1 Sept 2026, 10:1355,003-7
31 Aug 2026, 07:3855,010-1
30 Aug 2026, 09:3455,011-2
29 Aug 2026, 09:2555,013+3
28 Aug 2026, 12:1455,010-10
27 Aug 2026, 15:3455,020-6
26 Aug 2026, 16:3455,026-17
25 Aug 2026, 17:1255,043-10
24 Aug 2026, 17:0955,053-28
22 Aug 2026, 23:3455,081first reading

Engagement

96 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 54,418 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,840
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.718%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 96 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held96 (23 July 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total403,470
Reactions total2,897
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,180
Videos
≈144
Links
≈1,030

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,351 reactions across 96 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,05757.1%
🔥92517.3%
❤57610.8%
🤝4147.74%
💯1302.43%
😁1172.19%
🤔1122.09%
🐳190.355%
🍾10.019%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 96 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,351 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 96 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @romcapital. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 96 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
3.13%
3 of 96 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
4,320
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
7,790
over 93 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJ5got5131 August 202631 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC≈4,240 views20 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

НАБОР ОТКРЫТ — БЕСПЛАТНОЕ ОБУЧЕНИЕ ТРЕЙДИНГУ С НУЛЯ Просто начать торговать — не сложно. Сложно — не слить депозит в первый месяц. Это обучение — как раз про то, как начать без ошибок. 3 дня — и у вас уже есть чёткая система. 📌 На интенсиве: — 3 стратегии: от первых сделок до стабильного дохода; — Упор на управление рисками — то, с чего должен начинать каждый; — Пошаговый план торговли с живыми примерами. 💻 Онла…

🤝12👍3🔥2😁2🐳1

25 Sept 2026, 18:00 UTC≈4,120 views19 reactionsread 26 September 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

Получаю много сообщений в личку с просьбой дать реальную рекомендацию Поэтому решил снова поделиться каналом, который действительно могу рекомендовать от себя Но мест немного — всего 15 подписок Кто не успеет, извиняйте 🤷 👉 https://t.me/+DXjQNjpQWVdlZWRi #реклама

🔥8👍5😁4🐳2

25 Sept 2026, 12:32 UTC≈5,630 views64 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

А вот и 4-ая попытка. Пока не получилось закрепиться выше Если месяц закроем ниже 2300 по индексу, то курс на снижение продолжится к 2.100-2.200

👍44🤔8❤7🔥4😁1

24 Sept 2026, 16:32 UTC≈4,170 views20 reactions5 Starsread 25 September 2026

Собрали для вас каналы, где нет инфо-шума и «быстрых денег», а есть реальная аналитика, идеи и системный подход к рынку. Сохраняйте, подписывайтесь и формируйте своё инфополе правильно: 🔹29 лет экспертизы. «Эксперт РА» — старейшее и крупнейшее рейтинговое агентство РФ. Рейтинги компаний, макро-прогнозы, обзоры отраслей и актуальные комментарии. Без инвест-советов — только объективные данные. Присоединяйтесь! Telegra…

👍10🔥7❤3

24 Sept 2026, 13:34 UTC≈6,330 views65 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

🤫Смотрю на рынок и понимаю… Хорошо, что я 🏦Сбер покупал до дивидендов и после дивидендов. Плюс сами дивиденды получил. Какой сейчас самый не тронутый сектор? - банковский, продолжаю удерживать идею. Средняя ~260₽.

🔥32👍18❤9💯4🤝2

24 Sept 2026, 11:28 UTC≈6,260 views59 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Что то мне подсказывает, что и 4-ая попытка не увенчается успехом Рынок сейчас держат на: • переговорах (основной фактор) Но давайте будем честны… Ждёт кто тут мира в ближайшее время? Я лично нет 🙅‍♂️ • нефть, но это больше вспомогательный фактор. Если будет позитив в переговорах, то нефть усилит рост, как условно нитро на спорткаре, спорткар без него быстро едет, а с ним быстрее. Но… если толку от переговоров…

🔥28👍20❤9😁2

24 Sept 2026, 08:19 UTC≈5,940 views49 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Ответный пост посмотрите… • Пост от 9 сентября: https://t.me/romcapital/8058 • Сегодня 24 сентября: Минфин предлагает повысить ставку налога на прибыль с дивидендов, уплачиваемых в пользу нерезидентов на счета «С» до 35% — ведомство Минфин предлагает установить для ПИФов обязанности по уплате налога на прибыль с получаемых пассивных доходов по ставке 15% Минфин предлагает ввести налог для отдельных добывающих ор…

🔥23👍13🐳8❤3🤝2

23 Sept 2026, 09:39 UTC≈6,060 views60 reactionsread 28 September 2026

🗣 Никаких предпосылок для выхода на мирные переговоры по Украине пока нет, хотя Россия сохраняет свою открытость для них, — Песков Мои мысли следующие: Чем дольше не будет переговоров, тем сильнее рынок разочаруются. Да, опять, как было много раз уже. Но добавьте сюда ещё коррекцию в нефти, которая произошла с 109 до 98. То падать будем сильно, думаю.

👍26❤19🔥7🤝7😁1

23 Sept 2026, 07:15 UTC≈6,220 views48 reactionsread 28 September 2026

Дефицит федерального бюджета РФ за 1п 2026г составил 5,85 триллиона рублей при утвержденном дефиците 3,786 триллиона рублей на конец 2026 г — отчет Счетной палаты Дефицит выше нужного. И причем сильно выше. Государство будет вынужденно и дальше привлекать средства. Но вопрос «Как…?» - размещая новые ОФЗ, что будет давить уже на текущие выпуски. - налоги, сборы и так далее. Будет давить на доходы людей и бизнеса. …

👍34❤8🔥3😁2🐳1

22 Sept 2026, 13:50 UTC≈6,480 views61 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Самолёт. На чем падаем, на чем растёт? Вспомним хронологию: 1. Начали падение на плохом отчёте в августе • Выручка сократилась на 31,3% год к году до 117,5 млрд рублей. • EBITDA сократилась на 39,9% год к году до 31,3 млрд. • Убыток составил 22,3 млрд рублей против прибыли 1,8 млрд годом ранее. • Чистый долг сократился на 8,4%, до 102,8 млрд. • Коэффициент «Чистый долг / скорректированная EBITDA» улучшился и с…

👍43🔥10🤝6❤1😁1

22 Sept 2026, 10:40 UTC≈6,590 views80 reactionsread 28 September 2026

Нефть уже -10$ Неплохо заработали на шорте. Кто в шортах - можно фиксировать. Потенциал снижения есть еще к 90. Саудиты восстановили нефтепровод, и Трампу надо охладить котировки. Но всегда и везде говорю: ЖАДНОСТЬ - это ГРЕХ. ________________________________ А что по рынку акций? Пока лонгов не вижу. Рынок держат на «переговорах», но как только увидим негатив по ним. А он будет, я думаю, не договорились, по сро…

👍58🔥9❤8🤝5

20 Sept 2026, 17:59 UTC≈4,320 views20 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Advertisement

Всем привет, меня зовут Максим, недавно я решил купить здесь рекламу. Очень уважаю и ценю автора канала и Вас, его подписчиков, поэтому с огромной радостью, просто и честно расскажу о себе и своём канале. И если то, о чём я пишу вас заинтересует, обязательно подпишитесь, буду вам очень рад 🤝 Мой канал основан на необычном подходе, который исключает из трейдинга и торговли нервы и эмоции, а приучает к расслабленным и…

👍15😁3❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @romcapital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Sept 2026, 10:37 UTCAnonymous Poll330 voters

А вы используете ИИ в торговле / сборе информации на рынке?

  1. Да19%
  2. Нет38%
  3. Нет, но хочу научиться46%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Romanov Capital” (@romcapital), 54,418 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romcapital.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.