Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Душевный трейдер

Channel

Душевный трейдер

@dushevny_trading

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

69,712subscribers

-392 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001471435553
TypeChannel
Username@dushevny_trading
DescriptionКанал по трейдингу без лишних запар. По рекламе: @managromanov Автор: @alekseevmaxx Всё, что происходит в рамках канала не является индивидуальной инвестиционной рекомендацией. РКН https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67aad9648a84ac04ab246a9a
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dushevny_trading

Growth

69,71270,10469,9086 August 2026 — 70,104 subscribers7 August 2026 — 70,097 subscribers8 August 2026 — 70,075 subscribers9 August 2026 — 70,062 subscribers10 August 2026 — 70,038 subscribers11 August 2026 — 69,849 subscribers12 August 2026 — 69,838 subscribers13 August 2026 — 69,794 subscribers14 August 2026 — 69,761 subscribers15 August 2026 — 69,737 subscribers17 August 2026 — 69,712 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -392. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69,653–70,163 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:2469,712-25
15 Aug 2026, 18:2569,737-24
14 Aug 2026, 08:1569,761-33
13 Aug 2026, 01:4369,794-44
12 Aug 2026, 03:4569,838-11
11 Aug 2026, 00:3369,849-189
10 Aug 2026, 02:4170,038-24
9 Aug 2026, 05:0270,062-13
8 Aug 2026, 04:1770,075-22
7 Aug 2026, 00:5470,097-7
6 Aug 2026, 02:0670,104first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.51%
avg views ÷ 69,712 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,630
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.851%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held59 (29 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total391,170
Reactions total3,329
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,260
Videos
41
Links
482

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,124 reactions across 55 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,57450.4%
🔥68021.8%
49215.7%
🕊2096.69%
😁1695.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,329reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC≈1,290 views24 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Voice message

Честно и открыто про клуб «Экосистема Инвестиции» Зачем, для чего и что там?

👍107🔥6🕊1

17 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈1,800 views29 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Пример в действии. Который говорит, что не надо спешить. Всё должно быть постепенно. Заработали - зафиксировали часть - стоп в ноль или в прибыль. Слабость на рынке продолжается. Но учитывая рост валюты и нефти, то я бы не пересаживал в шортах.

👍13🔥86🕊2

17 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈2,870 views60 reactionsread 17 August 2026

P.S. сегодня кстати набор в мой клуб — «Экосистема Инвестиций» Набор открою в 18:00, цену поставил символическую 890₽ / месяц. Знаете почему многие «эксперты» ставят тарифы на свои платки от 3-6 месяцев и так далее? А месяца нет. они преподносят это под соусом, что мы за долгосрочное сотрудничество. Но реальная причина в том, что они понимают, никакой ценности они не дадут, люди через месяц отпишутся. Могли бы по

🔥35👍149🕊2

17 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈3,190 views40 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Нефть и валюта растут. Рынок падает, почему так происходит? Ну основная причина в новостях про конфликт, что его заморозки ждать не стоит и так далее. Видели, думаю. Новые удары по ВБ и НПЗ. Это все провоцирует рост инфляции. Товара становится меньше - значит растет стоимость = инфляции. Дефицит бензина - рост бензина = инфляционный риск: за первую декаду июля 2026г бензин АИ-92 подорожал на 20% по сравнению с ан

👍238🔥5🕊4

16 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈5,820 views54 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Продолжение… В Подольске из-за попадания БПЛА загорелся склад Wildberries. Мысли все те же. Для экономики это плохо. Берегите себя и своих близких 🙏

🕊2711👍11🔥4😁1

14 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC≈6,640 views213 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Шорты в новых реалиях рынка - это необходимость. Любите / не любите, торгуете / не торгуете их, но это так. Да, поймать удачную точку входа в лонг куда лучше, чем удачную точку в шорт. Про это писал тут - ссылка. Если откинуть из расчета комиссии за шорт. То шорт ограничен 100%-ой прибылью, больше не заработать… Ведь актив ниже 0 не уйдет, верно? То вот лонг не ограничен прибылью. 100 / 200 и 300% рост может быт

🔥109👍8615🕊3

14 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC≈6,350 views60 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Пример, что не надо спешить сразу закрывать. Получили прибыль - частично зафиксировали - стоп двигаем в прибыль. Ждём. Не возможно угадать где конец снижения, можем предположить, опираясь на уровни и так далее. Поэтому я оставил на след неделю 20-25% спекулятивных шортов. Так и работает Душевный 🤝

👍3912🔥6🕊3

14 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈6,350 views47 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Voice message

Продолжаю частично прикрывать шорты в клубе. Но какую то часть переношу через выходные. Также по металлам спекулятивно идея в шорт - отыгрываю через серебро. Всем хорошего вечера 🔥

👍2710🔥7🕊3

14 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC≈6,330 views49 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Без «я же говорил», но мои действия в постах выше🤝 Никаких лонгов у нас не было. Шортовые позиции удерживаю. Буду переносить через выходные.

👍3310🔥4🕊2

13 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈6,520 views45 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Вы были предупреждены! Никаких лонгов у нас не было. Шортовые идеи из голосового, Я частично отыграл их в клубе. В Самолет не входил (там уверено пробили 400р, опасно было). Совкомбанк в небольшом плюсе. Но не нравится пока ситуация. А вот нефтянку хорошо получилось отыграть. Башнефть особенно, прибыль за день. Так и работает Экосистема Инвестиций

🔥21👍156🕊3

13 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC≈6,270 views69 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

«Хочешь отыграть рост золота, то причем тут золотодобытчики?» Насущный вопрос в наше время. На мой взгляд, золото подходит к пику локальной перегретости. От уровней 4400-4500 поищу шорты. Если все таки пробьем эту зону, то тогда рост ускорится. Но я ставлю на то, что пробьем через откат. Буду держать вас в курсе. Тема золота актуальна. Буду чаще её освещать и делиться сделками.

👍509🔥8🕊2

13 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈6,460 views45 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Ущерб Wildberries и селлеров от атак на склады может достигать ₽600–800 млрд. По оценкам участников рынка, пострадали более 400 тыс. селлеров, у некоторых сгорело до 95% товарных запасов — Forbes Последствия для экономики большие. Учитывая, что дефицит бюджета России сейчас 6.46 трлн рублей, то где брать деньги…? 🤷‍♂️ Исхода из этого я писал про Озон (+12.3% за неделю). Доля маркеплейсов следующая: • 47% ВБ (доля

👍278🔥6🕊4

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @dushevny_trading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 248,650 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Душевный трейдер” (@dushevny_trading), 69,712 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dushevny_trading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.