Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ْ๛رُمَيْصآ

@romaysa317

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

58subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001311270225
TypeChannel
Username@romaysa317
Descriptionمرزِ شهـادت خون نیست! خــودست... #نَفســـــــــــــــ . . راه ارتباطی من و شما :) @romaysa317_bot https://t.me/BiChatBot?start=sc-131518-zHVnxzf
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/romaysa317

Growth

586 August 2026 — 58 subscribers10 August 2026 — 58 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57–59 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 06:1558no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:5558first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 February 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
476
Videos
147
Links
68

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1470.0%
👍525.0%
😱15.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2023 to 13 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Feb 2025, 20:09 UTC88 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

🔹 «میراث» 🎈 چند سکانس از روز ظهور! 🎤 با نوای: عبدالحسین 🖋شاعر: فراق سیستانی 🎚 تنظیم:سید شهاب شوشتری 💽 کاری از: هیئت روح و ریحان 🎨کاور آرت: استودیو قَطّ 🔗 #امام_زمان #تبری 📻 @RadioSatr | #اختصاصی 📻 @heiaaterohoreihan

👍1

2 Jul 2023, 21:35 UTC430 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

هر کسی با هر مشربی و عقیده ای، می تواند دوستدار علی(ع) باشد! برای اینکه او #حق است؛ همه‌ی او دوست داشتنی است. و حتی دشمنش در دل شیفته اوست و مخالفش در پنهان شیدای او... "ولایت علی، نه علی را دوست داشتن بلکه فقط علی را دوست داشتن است" | علی‌صفایی‌حائری،غدیر،ص ۱۲

3

17 Feb 2023, 19:47 UTC707 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

• قرآن بخوان بگو که خدا واحد است و بس هر که ادلّه خواست علی را نشان بده... #بعثت

4👍2

17 Feb 2023, 12:07 UTC529 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

غمخوارِ امامِ زمانت هستی؟ غمخوار یعنی اینکه بار از دوش آقامون برداریم.. تا حالا از دوشِ چند تا شیعه آقا بار و غم برداشتیم تا از غم های آقا هم کم کنیم؟ تا حالا چند بار قدر اون موقعیت هایی رو که خدا واسه ما می‌فرسته که به دستِ ما حل بشه رو میدونیم و گرهِ مشکل یه شیعه رو باز میکنیم؟ شیعه بودن مهم ترین بخشش تو عمل نمود پیدا می‌کنه. #مڪروبه

👍2

17 Feb 2023, 10:27 UTC460 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

• اگربی‌قرارِ امام‌زمان'ﷻ'هستید این‌‌نشانه‌ی‌سلامتیِ‌روحِ‌شماست! -استادپناهیان

4😱1

16 Feb 2023, 19:47 UTC413 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

• نحن الفقراء الذين أغناهم الله بحب الحُسين فقیرانی هستیم که خدا با حب حسین (ع) ما را غنی کرد...

2

Signed ꕥ رُمَیصآ ꕥ

16 Feb 2023, 19:39 UTC396 viewsread 10 August 2026
File

از سرمَم زیاده... من کی باشم بخوام گله کنم؟ :)💔

Signed ꕥ رُمَیصآ ꕥ

16 Feb 2023, 17:18 UTC351 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

پیشنهادِ من به شما: کیمیای محبت یادنامه‌ی مرحوم شیخ رجبعلی خیاط

1

Signed ꕥ رُمَیصآ ꕥ

16 Feb 2023, 17:08 UTC298 viewsread 10 August 2026

اگر میخواید به خودتون لطف کنید کتاب زندگی‌نامه ی علما رو بخونید. تازه متوجه میشید که چقدر عقب‌ اید! چقدر با اصل زندگی توحیدی فاصله داریم. کمال انسان کجاست و ما کجاییم... فاصله‌ی عرش و فرش رو درک می‌کنیم تو اوج سادگی، افلاکی بودن رو حس می‌کنیم تهش به این میرسی که برای خاص بودن سوگلی خدا شدن، نیاز به کوه کندن نیست! فقط باید خالص شد، برای معبود...

Signed ꕥ رُمَیصآ ꕥ

16 Feb 2023, 17:05 UTC227 viewsread 10 August 2026

یاربّ! دلـم رو برای خودت تربیت کن...

Signed ꕥ رُمَیصآ ꕥ

15 Feb 2023, 08:12 UTC263 viewsread 10 August 2026

امام حسن سلام الله علیه : كيفَ يكونُ المؤمنُ مؤمنا وهو يَسخَطُ قِسمَةُ ويُحَقِّرُ مَنزِلَتَهُ والحاكِمُ علَيهِ اللّه ُ ؟! مؤمن چگونه مى تواند مؤمن باشد در حالى كه از قسمت خود ناخشنود باشد و منزلت و وضعيت خود را ناچيز شمارد با آن كه كه حاكم بر او (و تعيين كننده سرنوشتش) خداست ؟! -بحارالانوار-

Signed ꕥ رُمَیصآ ꕥ

14 Feb 2023, 19:16 UTC192 viewsread 10 August 2026

یک یا حسین گفت سپاهی عقب کِشید خاتون خانواده‌ی فتاح خیبر است ... #علیامخدره

Signed ꕥ رُمَیصآ ꕥ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @romaysa317. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 836,096 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ْ๛رُمَيْصآ” (@romaysa317), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romaysa317.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.