Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Романов

@romanov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

206subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001641785757
TypeChannel
Username@romanov
Created26 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/romanov

Growth

205206205.510 Aug 2026, 00:01 — 205 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 14:12 — 206 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 00:0110 Aug 2026, 14:12
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 205–206 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 14:12206+1
10 Aug 2026, 00:01205first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 5 March 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 10s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

328 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9027.4%
8225.0%
👍7021.3%
🐳185.49%
❤‍🔥144.27%
😍113.35%
🥰92.74%
🦄82.44%
👏72.13%
😱51.52%
😁41.22%
🤡41.22%
🕊30.915%
💩10.305%
🤮10.305%
🥱10.305%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 328reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2023 to 10 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 16 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @romanov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 March 2023 to 10 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2025, 10:55 UTC≈4,310 views43 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026

Чтобы стать богатым, надо создавать ценность для общества Создаешь ценность для общества — общество говорит: «О, спасибо за проделанную работу, мы хотим вас отблагодарить за это. Вот наша небольшая долговая расписка. Назовем ее деньгами». Больше ценности для общества — больше денег. из книги Наваля Равиканта «How To Get Rich», перевод у Вани Замесина

21👍8🔥6🥰3😍2💩1🤡1🤮1

8 Jul 2024, 13:06 UTC≈4,980 views31 reactions16 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Илья Бирман рассказал, как сделал нам блиц-редизайн unicorngo.ru Подробнее в блоге Ильи: https://ilyabirman.ru/unicorn/

👍129🔥7🤡3

17 Mar 2024, 15:55 UTC≈8,610 views40 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

Мы сходили к Илье Бирману на консультацию Думал, что первая консультация будет больше вводной: познакомимся, расскажем про наш продукт и немного расскажем про проблемы в интерфейсе, над которыми ломаем голову. А вот уже на второй встрече сможем больше времени уделить именно интерфейсу. В итоге ушли со списком идей, которые хочется проверить и которые кажутся очень логичными (уже и реализовали несколько, но цифры ещ

🔥219😍6🥰2👍1🦄1

8 Jan 2024, 15:28 UTC≈2,560 views27 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

Зацените Перплексити: нейронку, которая сначала гуглит, а потом уже генерирует ответ. Так ответы получаются точными, а не выдуманными. Попросил объяснить разницу между дарвинизмом и неодарвинизмом: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/13abbc75-5481-4734-b6af-ecb1ad19427a Кстати, нейронка бесплатная и работает без VPN. Есть мобильное приложение.

👍96🦄6🔥4🥰2

7 Sept 2023, 09:30 UTC≈2,320 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Помните Helper? Так вот Helper за три месяца трудоустроил 100 дизайнеров в Тинькофф, VK, OZON и Яндекс А я им помогаю с разработкой 😎 У ребят вышла статья на vc про их путь: https://vc.ru/design/824315-kak-za-3-mesyaca-trudoustroit-100-dizaynerov-v-tinkoff-vk-ozon-i-yandeks

14🔥7🐳5🥰1🦄1

6 May 2023, 10:58 UTC≈2,330 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Тестируем в Poizon Shop оплату частями Чтобы не тратить сразу много денег, теперь можно заплатить половину сейчас, а половину через три недели. Проверяем, будет ли из-за этого больше заказов. Позавчера придумали, вчера сделали, а сегодня уже в проде. Каеф. Кстати, заглядывайте в @poizonshop

👍105❤‍🔥4👏1

28 Apr 2023, 10:22 UTC≈1,740 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Тинькофф бесит рекламой в приложении и в уведомлениях Оказывается, рекламу можно отключить. Написал в поддержку — пообещали больше ничего подобного не отправлять. Рекламные баннеры в приложении пропали сразу. А еще я попросил не показывать уведомления в таббаре, если это уведомления о скидках у партнеров. Сказали, что тут подумать надо, ответят завтра. В общем, надеюсь, что больше никакой рекламы.

🐳13👍43

1 Apr 2023, 10:55 UTC≈1,520 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Через 5 минут начинаем

🔥4

1 Apr 2023, 09:33 UTC≈1,790 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Как получить доступ к ChatGPT 1. Включить VPN. Для macOS пользуюсь бесплатным VPN Proxy Master из AppStore. 2. Арендовать на onlinesim.io иностранный номер телефона. Там нужно выбирать для какого сервиса, выбираем ChatGPT. Стоит пару долларов, оплатить можно с любой российской карты. 3. Зарегистрироваться на platform.openai.com. Почту нужно будет подтвердить. 4. Если нужен доступ к API, создайте карту на $5 через

👍8

31 Mar 2023, 19:44 UTC≈1,340 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔴 Завтра на стриме с Николаем Товеровским соберем телеграм-бот с ChatGPT Николай — директор школы Бюро, автор курса и книги об управлении проектами. Вместе с Николаем сделаем бота, который поможет управлять проектами, людьми и собой. Пока сам не знаю, что получится, будем придумывать и делать находу 👌 1 апреля, суббота, 14:00 в канале @fffworks Присоединиться — нажимайте, чтобы получить напоминание в Telegram о н

👍96🔥3😱3

23 Mar 2023, 10:35 UTC≈1,280 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Смотрите, чем сегодня занимаемся в офисе 🙃

❤‍🔥10🔥4😁4😍3

7 Mar 2023, 11:35 UTC≈3,280 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Записал лумчик о том, как мы внедрили ChatGPT в прод Хелперу (проект MAX и Сбера) Внутри рассказ о том, как это запрогать и как настраивать ChatGPT: — объяснить контект — нужный ton of voice — смайлики в тексте — здороваться как рэпер — взаимодействие ChatGPT с вашими API — общение с помощью войсов и кружков Ну и показываю, как наш бот может помочь во всем этом разбраться. https://www.loom.com/share/02746c68138449f

🔥13🕊3👍1🥰1🥱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @romanov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,234,887 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Романов” (@romanov), 206 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romanov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.