Voice message, posted without a caption
❤4❤🔥2🥰2🤗1
Channel
@roman_jantarniy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
348subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002139567439 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roman_jantarniy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roman_jantarniy |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:25 | 348 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:00 | 349 | +1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:49 | 348 | -2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 04:08 | 350 | +1 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 349 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 348 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 351 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 351 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
240 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 111 | 46.3% | |
| 🤗 | 25 | 10.4% | |
| 🥰 | 24 | 10.0% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 9.58% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 8.75% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 5.00% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 4.58% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 3.33% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.25% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.417% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.417% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤4❤🔥2🥰2🤗1
Как быть, когда такие времена?
❤12🤗1
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤7🔥1🥰1
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤5👏2🔥2👍1🥰1
Что может быть лучше неспешного утра, Когда улыбаешься миру Душой И, с жизни потоком сливаясь как будто, Ты чувствуешь: всё и всегда хорошо. Из точки баланса ты видишь иначе - Всё стало яснее, волшебней чуть-чуть, Решаются сами любые задачи И ум не страшит неизведанный путь. Знакомая лёгкость рождается в теле - Себе доверяешь и мысли чисты, А вместо когда-то поставленных целей Ты ставишь кораблик под парус мечты! …
❤8👏4🥰4👍1
🌀Иногда я очень цепляюсь за своё такое светлое, радужное состояние... 🤩⚪️🌷 Думаешь, ну вот, всё, я закрепилась в этом состоянии, в этом классном ощущении🌈, в этом Свете 🤩🤍 . И тут буквально один звонок, и ты просто ракетой 🚀вылетаешь в какое-то дребезжание...⚙️ И в эти моменты я задаю себе вопрос: "А где же моя духовность🤩, а где моя доброта 😻, а где моё самообладание🔱?" Где этот добрый, милосердный, принимающи…
❤5🥰5👏3
🛶Пустая лодка. Притча Мастер рассказывал: "В молодости я часто уходил в одиночестве на озеро и медитировал. У меня была небольшая лодка и я часами мог плавать и размышлять. Однажды на рассвете, когда ночь медленно превращалась в утро, я сидел с закрытыми глазами и медитировал. Внезапно чья-то лодка ударилась о мою и нарушила всю эту утреннюю гармонию. Как же меня это разозлило! Я хотел уже было обругать хозяина ло…
🔥6👏4🥰2
Кристаллическая решётка Земли прошла восьмую калибровку, это означает, что поле планеты больше не удерживает старую плотность. Ты можешь ощущать странность: привычные вещи перестали «держать», отношения, державшиеся на долженствовании, лопаются, как перетянутые струны. Это сброс отжившего. Земля более не резонирует с ложью, угодливостью, молчанием во имя спокойствия. Всё, что не подлинно, выходит на поверхность, что…
🔥7❤3🥰3👏2
Эта осень — твоя, поступай с ней как хочется, Расцветай всё сильней, прогоняй одиночество, Ты цветок, не боящийся мрака и сырости, На упрямстве одном умудрившийся вырасти. Пусть другие тоскуют по щебету летнему, И хандрят, и ругают любовь безответную, Ну, а ты будь мудрее — мечтай, слушай музыку, Сделай сонный сентябрь самым лучшим союзником, В жизни всё не по плану, отсутствует логика, Нотки нежности в строгом скр…
❤5🔥3👏2
Доброе утро, Мир! Радуйся, мы проснулись! Счастье плеснув в эфир, Солнышку улыбнулись))☀️😁😍🤗
❤11🤗3🙏3
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤10
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤7👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @roman_jantarniy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“С лёгким сердцем/ В гостях у Романа” (@roman_jantarniy), 348 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roman_jantarniy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.