Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

хорек-жужелица на проводе

@rogueonaline

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

63subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001474765108
TypeChannel
Username@rogueonaline
Descriptionтут будет всякая хуйня про локальный баттлрэп и не только @sofiafarcisble - для связи
Created14 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/rogueonaline

Growth

637 August 2026 — 63 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62–64 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 03:3063no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5863first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,420
Videos
696
Links
2,920

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3163.3%
💔816.3%
🔥510.2%
💋36.12%
👍12.04%
😁12.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2025 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jun 2026, 17:28 UTC33 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

новый стикер подъехал

2

2 Jun 2026, 17:24 UTC33 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

все наши, как я скучаю❤️‍🩹 надеюсь, когда то в полном (хотя бы частично) составе ещё почитаем репась🫂

2

10 Apr 2026, 11:39 UTC60 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

муд,когда мама попросила сделать лицо попроще для фотки:

1

10 Apr 2026, 11:38 UTC54 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

пока мешала тесто на куличи- вот кто воскрес.

😁1

17 Jan 2026, 13:28 UTC75 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

мы живём во времена, когда толоконникова постит сториз под трек пазнякса, все так,скролльте дальше.

🔥51👍1

16 Dec 2025, 19:01 UTC90 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

погнали на сейм терапию, посоны, здесь классно🙂

3

16 Dec 2025, 18:58 UTC78 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sifilismcPhoto

А эт про кого???

3

16 Dec 2025, 18:53 UTC81 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

короче, если резюмировать: -ждём текста на джиниусе и тогда уже точно скажем написал ли он свой магнум опус (точно нет) -помимо 3 фейспалмов и одного "ого" из за панчей ничего отметить в плане впечатлений не могу - больше эмоций было из за факта выхода чем из за самих песен (возможно я уже не целевая аудитория, ху ноуз) - если мысленно объединить два последних пункта: альбом ти феста, который вышел в этом году, по да

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rogueonaline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“хорек-жужелица на проводе” (@rogueonaline), 63 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rogueonaline.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.