Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Врач диетолог Родюшкина Ольга

Channel

Врач диетолог Родюшкина Ольга

@rodushkinaON

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,286subscribers

-222 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001824372813
TypeChannel
Username@rodushkinaON
DescriptionК стройности без мракобесия Подписаться на канал в MAX https://max.ru/rodushkinaON ▪️Правила чата:https://telegra.ph/PRAVILA-CHATA-06-17-64
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/rodushkinaON

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,28613,50813,3977 August 2026 — 13,508 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,503 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,497 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,495 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,493 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,485 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,481 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,480 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,479 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,474 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,470 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,466 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,472 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,467 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,466 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,460 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,458 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,457 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,453 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,448 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,449 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,447 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,449 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,446 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,442 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,434 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,424 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,416 subscribers26 September 2026 — 13,393 subscribers4 October 2026 — 13,370 subscribers9 October 2026 — 13,360 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,345 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,344 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,343 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,344 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,337 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,336 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,333 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,329 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,324 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,323 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,321 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,319 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,320 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,317 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,311 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,308 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,305 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,303 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,301 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,299 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,297 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,289 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,288 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,286 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 91 days, net -222. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,253–13,541 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 11:3513,286-2
5 Nov 2026, 10:3913,288-1
4 Nov 2026, 13:1813,289-8
3 Nov 2026, 15:1713,297-2
2 Nov 2026, 12:4713,299-2
1 Nov 2026, 13:5013,301-2
31 Oct 2026, 12:1613,303-2
30 Oct 2026, 11:2913,305-3
29 Oct 2026, 08:4613,308-3
28 Oct 2026, 08:2913,311-6
27 Oct 2026, 06:5613,317-3
26 Oct 2026, 06:4813,320+1
25 Oct 2026, 07:0613,319-2
24 Oct 2026, 04:5013,321-2
23 Oct 2026, 03:3713,323-1
22 Oct 2026, 03:0413,324-5
20 Oct 2026, 21:5813,329-4
19 Oct 2026, 18:1813,333-3
18 Oct 2026, 16:5513,336-1
17 Oct 2026, 19:0813,337first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.99%
avg views ÷ 13,286 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,190
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held48 (25 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total17,908
Reactions total575
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 06:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,710
Videos
≈262
Links
≈347

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 07s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,336 reactions across 47 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤97541.7%
🔥59125.3%
💯27811.9%
👍1998.52%
👏451.93%
🤝361.54%
✍331.41%
😡291.24%
😁220.942%
🤔170.728%
👌160.685%
🤗160.685%
⚡130.557%
👀130.557%
🥰130.557%
❤‍🔥90.385%
😍90.385%
🤣90.385%
🤩80.342%
🙏20.086%
3 further kinds30.128%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,336 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (66.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 11:35 UTC520 views26 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Сначала подумала корм для животных, пригляделась, показалось. Состав:24 г белка, без масла 100 калорий Пробовали? Находка в Ярче

🔥20😁5😎1

4 Nov 2026, 01:40 UTC927 views48 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Ранний диабет 2 типа обратим В рандомизированном испытании https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X26002942 96 взрослых с диабетом 2 типа и ожирением распределили на две группы. Одну группу посадили на низкокалорийное питание с аэробными и силовыми тренировками, другую на обычное лечение. Через 24 недели ремиссия диабета была у 54% в группе с дефицитом калорий и тренировками против 4% просто …

👍35❤13

2 Nov 2026, 04:50 UTC≈1,250 views41 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Пока девчата заходят на учебу, поделюсь с вами видео из инсты про 10 000 шагов 10.000 шагов в день - как один из лучших примеров полезного маркетинга. Да, безусловно, цифра в свое время была взята из головы, но скольким людям она помогла. Безусловно, лучше пройти 10.000 шагов, чем не пройти вообще, при этом, конечно, если вы остановились на 5000 или 9.200, не нужно в ущерб себе идти дальше, вы и так молодец. 👍 P…

❤29👏9👍3

2 Nov 2026, 04:33 UTC968 views52 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Ответ на вчерашние дебаты Среди худеющих существует ошибочное и очень распространенное мнение, что питание для снижения веса = полезное питание. Да, то самое ПП. Увы, это не так. Кто придумал эту формулировку, и что хотел этим сказать, не знаю. Но она не совсем корректная ПП по сути своего названия несёт посыл, что если есть правильное питание, значит есть неправильное. Ну, так ведь? А не кажется ли вам, ч…

❤31🔥10💯9👌2

1 Nov 2026, 12:52 UTC873 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Вечер перестает быть томным.👩‍👦 В Максе дебаты.❗️ А вы как считаете? Есть разница между сбалансированным питанием и ПП?

❤8

1 Nov 2026, 12:34 UTC929 views35 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Международное общество спортивного питания (ISSN) опубликовало новую официальную позицию по диетам для снижения массы тела https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42867412/ в которой четко сказано, что какую бы вы диету не использовали для похудения, будь то низкоуглеводная, или высокобелковая, с интервальным голоданием или без него, с двумя приёмами пищи или шестью, ни один из этих подходов не отменяет энергетический б…

🤝17❤9🔥7🥰2

31 Oct 2026, 11:29 UTC≈1,120 views50 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Что готовит диетолог? Котлетки из минтая. А что варят ваши горшочки сегодня?

🔥30✍7👍7👀2🤗2❤1👏1

30 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC≈1,320 views15 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Если кто то пропустил, напоминаю: До начала учебы в Азбуке осталось 2 дня. Здесь всё о том, как похудеть и удержать результат, о том, как есть вкусно — не отказывая себе ни в чем. Ещё здесь про здоровье, поведение и устойчивые результаты, потому что образ жизни — это что-то про регулярные действия, ведь так? Узнать про учебу можно здесь⤵️ https://docs.google.com/forms/d/11P4jr2hs6faCO-yFy7N4E5VcfY0cwLUGsrg8zbB9A5…

❤15

28 Oct 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,500 views49 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥27👍10❤8✍4

27 Oct 2026, 13:36 UTC≈1,310 views37 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

300 ккал — это порция, которая может выглядеть безусловно по-разному в зависимости от выбранных вами продуктов, а создать дефицит можно за счет продуктов с высокой энергетической плотностью. Да, тех самых, высококалорийных «маленьких удовольствий», которых едим мы порой без меры, просто не задумываясь, насколько они калорийны при своем минимальном объёме. Ну кто остановится на 60 г чипсов? Именно поэтому такие пр…

❤32💯5

27 Oct 2026, 05:39 UTC≈1,350 views38 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

По меньшей мере глупо. Тем более, что у нас тут нет голодных. Как провести параллель между своим драгоценным жиром и этими злосчастными калориями? 1 килограмм жира - это примерно 9000 ккал. Чтобы потерять 500 граммов - 1 килограмм за неделю, вы должны обеспечить дефицит от 500 ккалорий в сутки (зависит от исходных параметров. Цифры условные). 250-300 берем из еды (отнимаем от своего меню кусочек размером в 250-30…

💯25❤7👌6

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @rodushkinaON. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@rodushkinaON edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
7 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @rodushkinaON as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
20 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTCAnonymous Poll188 voters

Пьете ли вы безалкогольное пиво?

  1. Да, отличный изотоноик👍35%
  2. Нет, не пью вообще и пиво в том числе, двже безалкогольное53%
  3. Нет, считаю что оно вредное13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Blog Kardiologa 🩺
@blog_kardiologa · 138,357
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Эндокринолог ❤️ Ольга Павлова 💊 Диабет
@dia_dietolog_olga_pavlova · 58,637
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
Даша_худей печатает…
@dasha_hudey · 34,062
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 3 September 2026
Рецепты в Мультиварке и Аэрогриле!
@multivarka_recepti_eda · 31,851
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Врач диетолог Родюшкина Ольга” (@rodushkinaON), 13,286 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rodushkinaON.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.