3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 490–492 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 22:47
492
+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:47
490
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:20
490
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.3%
avg views ÷ 492 subscribers
Avg views / post
218
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held
17 (16 April 2026 – 30 July 2026)
Views total
218
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
216 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
76
35.2%
👍
60
27.8%
❤🔥
39
18.1%
🤣
10
4.63%
🤯
10
4.63%
🏆
8
3.70%
👀
7
3.24%
💯
4
1.85%
🌚
1
0.463%
👎
1
0.463%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rodionchepel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 April 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Павел Дуров - в российском списке экстремистов и террористов. Чем не повод вспомнить путь Павла Валерьевича, который он прошел от академической гимназии в Петербурге до этого списка?
Полез за ссылкой для вас на KION – а там ее, конечно же, нет. Ну есесеннно, теперь весь фильм перетитровывать. Мое самочувствие коллегам с Киона. А дорогим зрителям и подписчикам рекомендую пересмотреть наш байопик об отечественном IT-с…
⚡️Новое интервью на моем ютуб-канале!
В этом выпуске музыкальный продюсер Дмитрий Гройсман, который вместе с Михаилом Козыревым [иноагент в РФ] создавал культовый рок-фестиваль «Нашествие», продюсировал группы «Чайф» и «Бригада С» вместе с Гариком Сукачевым, а также «СерьГу» и«ПилОт».
Дмитрий Гройсман расскажет, почему сменил театр Олега Табакова на золотую эпоху русского рока, о харизме Аллы Пугачевой и криминальн…
⚡️Новое интервью на моем ютуб-канале!
В новом интервью — Катя IOWA, чей голос и песни стали саундтреком поколения 2010-х.
Это искренний разговор о вере в себя, золушках в реальной жизни, знаковых встречах и магии музыки, которая способна менять мир.
Смотрите интервью Кати IOWA по ссылке:
https://youtu.be/3BTM_kQStgY
⚡️Новое интервью на моем ютуб-канале!
В этом выпуске – музыкальный продюсер Евгений Иосифович Фридлянд.
Мы погрузились в атмосферу безумных 90-х и узнали из первых уст, как организовывались стадионные туры для «Парк Горького» и «Агата Кристи», как открыл миру Меладзе и какую роль сыграла Алла Пугачева.
Вы услышите эксклюзивные и забавные истории о гастролях с группой «Браво», капризах Жанны Агузаровой, шальных ден…
⚡️Новое интервью на моем ютуб-канале!
Давид Нуриев aka Птаха – экс-участник легендарной московской рэп-группы «Центр». Он – один из тех, кто создал русский рэп. Птаха, Слим и Гуф собрались в 2004 и за пять лет стали главными звездами в российском хип-хопе. В 2009 из группы ушел Гуф, и слава ребят переплавилась в статус легенд.
О тех принципах, которые сделали группу «Центр» единственной и неповторимой, об эволюции …
Я убрал интервью Юрия Аксюты с канала из-за нарушения авторских прав. Приношу свои извинения уважаемым подписчикам – тем, кто увидел анонс, хотел посмотреть, но не смог
Тут полностью моя ответственность, продолжаю работать над решением этого вопроса
⚡️Новое интервью на моем ютуб-канале!
«Коламбия Пикчерз не представляет», «Манхэттен», «Про красивую жизнь» — треки группы Банд’Эрос, которые прописались во всех чартах нулевых.
На пике популярности Батишта принял решение уйти из коллектива. В этом интервью мы поговорили о том, что привело к такому шагу, и жалеет ли он об этом сейчас.
https://youtu.be/l8DeqGFGzt8
⚡️Новое интервью у меня на Ютуб-канале!
Бурлаков Леонид — человек, который сформировал детство и юность нашего поколения, открывший широкой публике Мумий Тролль, Земфиры(иноагент в РФ) и Братья Грим.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-DfianNV9g
Пока все обсуждают «Минотавра» Звягинцева в Каннах, вкину ещё два слова про вчерашний АПКиТ. Тотальным триумфатором стал сериал «Подслушано в Рыбинске» (сценарий Иван Абрамов, постановка Петр Тодоровский), я считаю что заслуженно – радовался за каждую их (из 4!) награду, как за свою. А на фото – нарядная часть нашей команды фильма «Секс в СССР», номинанта на «Лучший док фильм»: продюсеры Родион Чепель и Мария Серпион…
Сегодня церемония вручения премии Ассоциации продюсеров кино и ТВ. Наш фильм «Секс в СССР» номинирован как лучший документальный. Это значит, что он уже в тройке лучших док проектов года💪💪💪
Но кроме него есть еще проекты Сельянова и Прокопенко, а это – мастодонты. Желаю всем удачи 🤞
ЛИСТЬЕВУ - 70
Сегодня могло бы исполнится 70 лет очень важной фигуре в нашей истории – телеведущему и продюсеру Владу Листьеву. Скажу тут не личное – я его не знал, да и не мог знать лично. Скажу профессиональное.
Он ушел очень рано, и его жизнь давно – парад годовщин. К одной из них – к 25-летию со дня убийства – мы сняли документальный фильм-расследование, который я и сейчас считаю лучшим в своей (нескромно зам…
👍14🔥6❤🔥2👀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @rodionchepel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 511,472 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧЕПЕЛЬ” (@rodionchepel), 492 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rodionchepel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
