3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 399–400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 11:08
400
+1
7 Aug 2026, 04:17
399
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:08
399
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 8 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
219 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
97
44.3%
👍
51
23.3%
❤
29
13.2%
😁
13
5.94%
🤣
11
5.02%
😱
7
3.20%
🍌
3
1.37%
👏
2
0.913%
🏆
1
0.457%
👀
1
0.457%
👎
1
0.457%
🗿
1
0.457%
🤔
1
0.457%
🤡
1
0.457%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2022 to 29 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вообще не использую. Пока присматриваюсь и думаю, хайп это или реальность6%
Базовый чат. Иногда пишу запросы в ChatGPT или Claude, использую ИИ как продвинутый поиск56%
Работа в проектах. Освоил работу в «папках», загружаю туда контекст и файлы25%
Создатель агентов. Умею собирать простых ботов-помощников: GPTs в ChatGPT, Gems в Gemini6%
Вайб-кодинг. Создаю сайты, приложения или ботов, не боюсь слов GitHub, терминал и API17%
AI-зверь. Собираю агентов на OpenClaw, умею «обучать» ИИ под свои задачи (fine-tune) .11%
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Про вайб-кодинг
Давно хотел зафиксировать. Сделаю это здесь. За последний год сделал больше, чем за несколько лет до этого. Быстрее в разы. Иногда — за часы то, что раньше занимало недели и команду.
Сейчас можно собрать приложение на уровне среднего разработчика за вечер.
Промпт = новое ТЗ. Только быстрее и без созвонов.
Порог входа упал.
Но есть нюанс.
Вайб-кодинг — это не профессия. Это переходный этап. Через 1…
Ходят слухи, что VPN отключат с марта.
Я и моя команда уже 2 года пользуемся своим личным VPN.
Если интересно как это сделать 40 огней 🔥 и скидываю ответ 😃
Интересное интервью
Фото 2016 года посещаю амоКОНФ. Там впервые увидел основателя Михаила Токовинина.
Сегодня через 7 лет увидел его интервью и был поражен глубиной.
Вот 10 ключевых инсайтов о бизнесе из этого интервью:
1. Выбор ниши определяет судьбу бизнеса. Нужно выбрать небольшую, но перспективную нишу, чтобы иметь шансы на успех.
2. Тщеславие и амбициозность способны как сделать предпринимателя успешным, та…
🤬Как убрать негативный отзыв с WB
Моему ученику прилетает 1 звезда с отзывом:
Товар дорогой, на Ali Express дешевле!
Что самое интересное товар забрали и оплатили.
Что надо делать:
0. Поставить несколько дизлайков, что бы отзыв ушел вниз.
1. Написать в поддержку WB, пожаловать на отзыв, что это конкуренты. Поддержка ответит «мы дорабатываем модерацию отзывов бла бла бла», отзыв в 99% не уберут
2. Только после о…
Что появится в историях Telegram
• У историй будет функция записи с основной и фронтальной камеры одновременно.
• В историях можно будет отмечать (@username) людей. Отмеченным пользователям будут приходить уведомления о таких упоминаниях.
• Недоделанную историю можно отправить в черновики
• У историй может быть текстовая подпись.
• Возможность контролировать время жизни истории.
• Истории можно будет архи…
Отзывы на Пирсинг в соски
Я продавал секс товары на маркетплейсах и очень переживал, что отзывы никто не будет оставлять. Я ошибался, люди охотно делились отзывами и не стесняются.
А сегодня случайно обнаружил товар «Пирсинг в соски».
Посмотрите фото к отзывам. Девушки с радостью показываются свои сиськи.
Вот каким товаром надо заниматься.
Фото и ссылка в комментариях.
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤6👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rodin_money. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вообще не использую. Пока присматриваюсь и думаю, хайп это или реальность6%
Базовый чат. Иногда пишу запросы в ChatGPT или Claude, использую ИИ как продвинутый поиск56%
Работа в проектах. Освоил работу в «папках», загружаю туда контекст и файлы25%
Создатель агентов. Умею собирать простых ботов-помощников: GPTs в ChatGPT, Gems в Gemini6%
Вайб-кодинг. Создаю сайты, приложения или ботов, не боюсь слов GitHub, терминал и API17%
AI-зверь. Собираю агентов на OpenClaw, умею «обучать» ИИ под свои задачи (fine-tune) .11%
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2022 to 29 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Родин Виктор” (@rodin_money), 400 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rodin_money.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
