Channel
@rocks_minerals
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001539361877 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rocks_minerals |
| Description | Продажа камней, минералов и окаменелостей. По всем вопросам обращайтесь @CuSO4ec |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rocks_minerals |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 12 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 12 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 22 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 31 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2024 to 5 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Авто в янтаре На днях Mercedes-Benz представил уникальную инсталляцию: культовый G-Class, «застывший» внутри огромного блока, внешне неотличимого от натурального балтийского янтаря. Это не просто эффектный арт-объект, но и остроумная метафора: как смола сохраняет древних насекомых, так и этот материал «законсервировал» автомобиль — реликвию эпохи нефти и индустриализации. Что за материал? Настоящий янтарь — это ока…
👍5
На Рівненщині військовим передали гранатомети, вилучені у бурштинової мафії
👍4
Звучит однако сюрреалистично—все как в кино- копы конфисковали реактивные гранатометы и 260 кг янтаря... Неплохой обьемчик однако-губа не дура, это вам не пару камней в кармане везти. Хотелось бы напомнить что янтарь крайне ценится на Востоке.. особенно в Китае— как камень олицетворяющий собой солнце. Контрабанда янтаря в Китай составляет около 5 тонн в год(данные китайской таможенной службы) , это все при том, что с…
👍5
А вот как выглядит азурит и некоторые другие образцы минералов под микроскопом в 80 кратном увеличении) Прислал друг изучающий геологию и минералогию в Университете Мёрдок , в Австралии
👍5
Неплохой образец рутилового кварца (в народе- волосатик) Волоски в кварце- это игольчатые или волосовидные кристаллы-включения самого рутила, поэтому у него такое название 350 грн, Мадагаскар, сбор конца прошлого века
👍4
Не так давно, 14 февраля, в отправлении из Тернополя, таможенники обнаружили удивительные ископаемые-камни, которые обладали причудливыми очертаниями, что и привело на мысль, что они могут иметь древнее происхождение, что и подтвердилось после проведения экспертизы. По итогу эксперты заявили, что остатки являются плитками красного песчаника раннего девона. «Специалисты музея также установили, что геологический возрас…
👍4
Барахло. Номинальная цена 200 грн(не продается) Купил для демонстрации кулон с поддельным лунным камнем. Итак на фото не лунный камень, а его дешевенький "близняшка"— опалит(синтетических стекл В отличии от настоящего лунного камня опалит имеет постоянную синеватую иризацию, у лк иризация появляется под углом в 8-15°, структура должна быть слоистая на просвет, но почти слитая. Также существует водный метод определени…
👍4
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @rocks_minerals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 539,862 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Минералы Одесса” (@rocks_minerals), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rocks_minerals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.