Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for روبوتردیک RoboTradic

Channel

روبوتردیک RoboTradic

@robotradic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

357subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001552229334
TypeChannel
Username@robotradic
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/robotradic

Growth

357364360.56 August 2026 — 364 subscribers6 August 2026 — 364 subscribers14 August 2026 — 363 subscribers22 August 2026 — 357 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 356–365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 23:19357-6
14 Aug 2026, 22:38363-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:02364no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:26364first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 April 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3562.5%
🥴1221.4%
47.14%
👌47.14%
🤩11.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2023 to 14 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 May 2023, 17:05 UTC≈1,150 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

نمودار eth/usdt در سال 2022 تا 2023 با اینکه بازار نزولی و خرسی رو شاهد بودیم ولی ربات کاملا سودده بود بدون توجه به جهت بازار میشه با ربات کار کرد

👍5

30 Apr 2023, 09:50 UTC≈1,480 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

در سه پلن میتونید از ربات اشتراک بگیرید کم ریسک : مناسب سرمایه های کلان و کسانی که میزان زیان برایشان بسیار مهم است ریسک متوسط : مناسب کسانی که هم سود بیشتری میخوان و هم درجه ریسک پذیریشون بالاتره پر ریسک : مناسب سرمایه های کم و کسانی که فقط دنبال سود زیاد هستن

👍7

29 Apr 2023, 14:44 UTC≈1,370 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ملت دوست دارن دروغ بشنون

👌4

29 Apr 2023, 14:43 UTC≈1,340 viewsread 6 August 2026

نمونه کانالهایی که مردم به راحتی گولشونو میخورن...

26 Apr 2023, 17:22 UTC≈1,280 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

معاملات ربات در یک سال گذشته

👍1

26 Apr 2023, 11:54 UTC987 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

دوستان هر تست و بک تستی رو باور نکنید، یکی ادعایی کرده بود که سالانه یک میلیون درصد سود درمیاره با رباتش بک تستم نشون میداد ولی اینجور رباتها روی چارتهای هیکن اشی یا رنکو تست میشن، این چارتها اصلا اعتباری ندارن

👍4

20 Apr 2023, 09:17 UTC≈2,020 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

تکرار میکنم هر کسی هر آزمایش یا تستی که بخواد میتونه از ربات بگیره جهت اثبات حرفامون همه گونه سند و مدرک داریم و خودتونم میتونین چک کنین گول کسایی که بدون سند و فتوشاپِ چند تا عکس، ادعاهای کذایی رو دارن نخورین

🥴5👍4🤩1

19 Apr 2023, 22:00 UTC≈536,000 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

وارد دنیای معاملات الگوریتمی شو نیاز نیست خودت بری از صفر شروع کنی! یه ربات محشر داریم که هرجور دلت میخواد ازش تست بگیر تا مطمئن شی خوبه یا نه بعدش با خیال راحت بشین و به کارهات برس و بذار ربات برات معامله کنه جهت اطلاعات بیشتر @robotradic www.robotradic.com

4🥴3👍2

19 Apr 2023, 21:19 UTC≈509,000 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📑 میدونستی بیش از ۸۰ درصد معاملات بازارهای جهانی توسط ربات انجام میشه؟؟! 📑 میدونستی اکثر معامله گرا و سرمایه گذارا ضرر میکنن چون نمیتونن با رباتها رقابت کنن؟! ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ ربات ویژه روبوتریدیک با سودسازی استثنائی 📈📊 حساب هزار دلاری رو تو سه سال، سی برابر کرده!!!🥇 حتی میشه تنظیماتو تغییر داد و به سود بیشتر و یا درُودان کمتر رسید👌 حتما به کانال و سایت ما سر بزنید: @robotradic www.robotradic.com

👍4🥴4

19 Apr 2023, 12:53 UTC≈1,650 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ربات روی جفت ارزای دیگه هم عملکرد مثبتی داره ولی بهترین برآیند در جفت ارز اتریوم به تتر هست

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @robotradic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,506,703 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“روبوتردیک RoboTradic” (@robotradic), 357 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/robotradic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.