๐ื โขอ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ ึด โกโ ๐คฉ โฉ #fa โ #only ใ ค โอโ ๐๐๐ author แน ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ โน ื
customย 531922845964019391810๐7customย 53730079098169348072

Channel
@robinsheart
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
339subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003723419100 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @robinsheart |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/robinsheart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 339 | +8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 331 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 331 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (1 August 2026 โ 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,642 |
| Reactions total | 337 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
337 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| customย 5319228459640193918 | 89 | 26.4% | |
| customย 5375607361463429331 | 80 | 23.7% | |
| customย 6183976535066677640 | 52 | 15.4% | |
| customย 5213218698155807974 | 28 | 8.31% | |
| customย 5314598618039087833 | 26 | 7.72% | |
| ๐ | 26 | 7.72% | |
| customย 5373007909816934807 | 16 | 4.75% | |
| customย 5318949531579087962 | 13 | 3.86% | |
| customย 5319046297192268854 | 7 | 2.08% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegramโs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 337reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐ื โขอ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ ึด โกโ ๐คฉ โฉ #fa โ #only ใ ค โอโ ๐๐๐ author แน ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ โน ื
customย 531922845964019391810๐7customย 53730079098169348072
๐ื โขอ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ ึด โกโ ๐คฉ โฉ #cos โ #only ใ ค โอโ ๐๐๐ author แน ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ โน ื
๐8customย 53192284596401939186customย 61839765350666776405customย 53756073614634293312
Signed ะัะฝัะธ
๐ื โขอ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ ึด โกโ ๐คฉ โฉ #fa โ #only ใ ค โอโ ๐๐๐ author แน ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ โน ื
customย 53189495315790879629customย 53192284596401939186customย 52132186981558079743
Signed ะัะฝัะธ
๐ื โขอ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ ึด โกโ ๐คฉ โฉ #fa โ #only ใ ค โอโ ๐๐๐ author แน ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ โน ื
customย 53756073614634293318๐4customย 61839765350666776404customย 53145986180390878331
Signed ะัะฝัะธ
๐ื โขอ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ ึด โกโ ๐คฉ โฉ #fa โ #only ใ ค โอโ ๐๐๐ author แน ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ โน ื
customย 53730079098169348077customย 53189495315790879624customย 53756073614634293314customย 52132186981558079741customย 53145986180390878331customย 61839765350666776401
Signed ะัะฝัะธ
Photo, posted without a caption
customย 531922845964019391811customย 61839765350666776402customย 53756073614634293311
๐ื โขอ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ ึด โกโ ๐คฉ โฉ #fa โ #only ใ ค โอโ ๐๐๐ author แน ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ โน ื
customย 52132186981558079747customย 53756073614634293316customย 53192284596401939184customย 53190462971922688542customย 53730079098169348071
๐ื โขอ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ ึด โกโ ๐คฉ โฉ #fa โ #only ใ ค โอโ ๐๐๐ author แน ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ โน ื
customย 53756073614634293318customย 53145986180390878335customย 61839765350666776405customย 52132186981558079742
๐ื โขอ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ ึด โกโ ๐คฉ โฉ #fa โ #only ใ ค โอโ ๐๐๐ author แน ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ โน ื
customย 53192284596401939188customย 53190462971922688545customย 53756073614634293315customย 53145986180390878333customย 52132186981558079741customย 61839765350666776401
๐ื โขอ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ ึด โกโ ๐คฉ โฉ #fa โ #only ใ ค โอโ ๐๐๐ author แน ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ โน ื
customย 61839765350666776408customย 53756073614634293314customย 53192284596401939183customย 53730079098169348073customย 53145986180390878331
Signed ๏ธ ๏ธ ๏ธ ๏ธ ๐ ๐๐แฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฆ ึด ๐ ๏ธ ๏ธ ๏ธ ๏ธ
ะฒะฐั ะปัะฑะธะผัะน ะฟะตะนัะธะฝะณ ั ัะพะฑะธะฝ ๐๐
The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
customย 53756073614634293318customย 53192284596401939187customย 61839765350666776405customย 52132186981558079741customย 53145986180390878331customย 53730079098169348071
๐ื โขอ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ ึด โกโ ๐คฉ โฉ #fa โ #only ใ ค โอโ ๐๐๐ author แน ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ โน ื
customย 53192284596401939188customย 53756073614634293315customย 53145986180390878334
Signed ๏ธ ๏ธ ๏ธ ๏ธ ๐ ๐๐แฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฆ ึด ๐ ๏ธ ๏ธ ๏ธ ๏ธ
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @robinsheart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ะฒะฐั ะปัะฑะธะผัะน ะฟะตะนัะธะฝะณ ั ัะพะฑะธะฝ ๐๐
The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank โ 656,742 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ข๐ง โก๏ธเบด ๐ ๐๐๐๐ึด ๏ธ๐๐โ (@robinsheart), 339 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/robinsheart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.