Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Hawthorne Hall

@robilliardd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004424281859
TypeChannel
Username@robilliardd
Created4 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/robilliardd

Growth

32011.58 August 2026 — 3 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20 subscribers8 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 0–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 16:1620no change
8 Aug 2026, 20:5720+17
8 Aug 2026, 16:153first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
273.3%
avg views ÷ 20 subscribers
Avg views / post
54.7
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held12 (4 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total492
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC11 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @liferiserPhoto

A big thank you to Jared for being such a great new friend and for making last night even more memorable! It was really nice getting to know you, sharing conversations, laughs, and good moments throughout the event. Even though we just met, I’m glad we got the chance to cross paths. Here’s to new friendships and more good moments ahead! #TheLastReverberation

9 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC11 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @sereductionPhoto

Jared and I walking out like the paparazzi weren’t literally everywhere. But whatever, let them have their little moment. We’re not hiding, we’re not explaining and we definitely didn’t come here to feed anyone’s curiosity. Consider this the hard launch. You’re welcome.

9 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC81 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

The party may have come to an end, but the evening was far too lovely to surrender just yet. With the music still lingering in the air and Brigitta by my side, there was little reason to call the night over. #TheLastReverberation

9 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC88 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

All dressed up and ready for the night, but i’m not heading to the party just yet. I’ve got someone to pick up first. She said she’s ready, so i’ll be there for her. We’ll head to the party together, take our time and enjoy the night without rushing anything. And if the paparazzi happen to catch us on the way in? Let them. After all, if i’m fortunate enough to have such lovely company for the night, why should I be i

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @robilliardd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 195,045 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hawthorne Hall” (@robilliardd), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/robilliardd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.