Channel
@roadto4flatstpm
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
35,042subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001102851031 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roadto4flatstpm |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 28 February 2019β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roadto4flatstpm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 35,042 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 35,052 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 35,055 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 35,059 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 35,055 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 35,052 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 35,051 | -17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 35,068 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 August 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
450 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 303 | 67.3% | |
| π | 96 | 21.3% | |
| π | 19 | 4.22% | |
| π€ | 14 | 3.11% | |
| π’ | 5 | 1.11% | |
| π | 4 | 0.889% | |
| π | 4 | 0.889% | |
| π€© | 4 | 0.889% | |
| π₯° | 1 | 0.222% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 450reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 3 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Assalamualaikum bagi semua calon-calon mahasiswa, jemput join group tips interview di bawah untuk dapatkan tips dari senior-senior kita yang dah melepasi peringkat interview dan diterima di universiti TIPS INTERVIEW https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7kaiCGk1FjsLVXl80M
β€22π6π€©1
ππ
β€68π4
Photo, posted without a caption
β€19π8
Tau minggu pertama Oktober π«©
β€10
Assalamualaikum semua Tau tak bila agak ii tarikh rayuan stpm 05 keluar ?
β€12
Harap membantu bagi sesiapa yg buntu βΊοΈβ€οΈ
β€19π2
π‘π’π§π π¦π§π£π π¦ππ 1β£ 2β£ 3β£ pinned a photo
macam ii info Dan persoalan yang korang sendiri macam kenapa x dpt ? Kenapa kawan 3.00 dpt aku 4.00 x dpt ? Semua bole Tanya dekat mereka .. cuma jgn mintak pelik ii la ye ( bagi habuan untuk Lulus upu π )
β€11π1
Photo, posted without a caption
β€5π4π₯°1
Sesiapa yang x dapat upu pada minggu lepas..bole dtg ke putrajaya untuk konsultasi bersama pihak upu...βΊοΈβ
β€9
kalau buat rayuan bila dpt Tau ye sbb tgknya tarikh sama macam tutup hebahan upu ?
π€12β€8
π‘π’π§π π¦π§π£π π¦ππ 1β£ 2β£ 3β£ pinned Β«π’ #UPU RASMI Laman Web Semakan Keputusan Permohonan kemasukan ke Program Ijazah Sarjana Muda UPU secara rasmi akan dibuka pada 5 September 2025. Pautan Semakan: π https://jpt.unimas.my π https://jpt.utm.my π https://jpt.uum.edu.my π https://jpt.ums.edu.myβ¦Β»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @roadto4flatstpm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
nk Tau juga ramai batch 05 pilih uni mana first choice π
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 3 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank β 395,358 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@roadto4flatstpm named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ‘π’π§π π¦π§π£π π¦ππ 1β£ 2β£ 3β£β (@roadto4flatstpm), 35,042 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roadto4flatstpm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.