Channel
@STPMchemistrychannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,758subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002018431232 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @STPMchemistrychannel |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/STPMchemistrychannel |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:42 | 1,758 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 1,756 | +14 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 1,742 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:28 | 1,741 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 1,742 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 1,741 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 1,737 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 1,732 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 1,730 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
63 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 90.5% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 7.94% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
S1 question (Hard question) It is known that when 2 pieces of clean metals contact with each others, the metals will joined together without fusion or heating required and it is called as cold welding. This phenomenon usually occurs in space but not on earth and it leads to some mechanical problems in early satellites. Explain why this phenomenon occurs in space but not on earth.
Which of the following oxide has the highest melting point?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Dear subscribers, Please take note that this is NOT my group/channel/bot. Someone is using my group's name to confuse subscribers with the intention of asking for money. I hope you are all aware of this and remain alert. My group/channel provides FREE help for STPM students and will NEVER ask for payment. Thank you.
❤13
S3 question
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Errata correction of the book are included in this pdf. Please have a check for it and manually fix the error in your physical book. Wish you all have a good experience in learning S3 chemistry.
Dear Teachers and Students, Thank you very much for your support of our book, Express STPM S3 Chemistry @ A Plus Publication. We are committed to producing a reliable, accurate, and high-quality resource to help STPM students excel in their examinations. As part of this commitment, we would like to share the latest errata and enhancements for the book. Please update your copy by referring to the pages and sections…
❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5🔥4
Achievement of Team Malaysia at the 58th IChO Uzbekistan 2026 Adib Fahmy bin Awang: Honorable Mention 💪👍 Chang Xiao Jiun: Honorable Mention 👍💪❤️😘 Congratulations to both of you!
❤16🔥1
Check out EXPRESS STPM CHEMISTRY SEMESTER 1 - NOTES & TOPICAL ASSESSMENT (2026) for RM31.90. Get it on Shopee now! https://my.shp.ee/vRQBucWj.
https://my.shp.ee/TfrzR7gn
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @STPMchemistrychannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which of the following oxide has the highest melting point?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
S3 question
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
S2 Which of the following is true for a reversible reaction N₂(g)+3H₂(g)⇌2NH₃(g) that has achieved dynamic equilibrium?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“STPM Chemistry Channel” (@STPMchemistrychannel), 1,758 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/STPMchemistrychannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.