Channel
@rksby2020
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
415subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001165135413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rksby2020 |
| Description | Самакіраванне і самаарганізацыя. Станьце гаспадарамі сваіх двароў! Кансультацыі: @rks_support Звярнуцца ананімна: @KotosBot |
| Created | 24 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rksby2020 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 415 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 415 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 November 2025 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 91 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
51 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 45 | 88.2% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 11.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📣 Важна выказацца: абмяркоўваюцца змены ў Закон «Аб зваротах грамадзян і юрыдычных асоб» Праект змяшчае карысныя новаўвядзенні, але адначасова прапануе прызнаваць «злоўжываннем» звароты, якія нібыта дыскрэдытуюць дзяржаўныя органы або аказваюць ціск на службовых асоб. Такія расплывістыя фармулеўкі могуць стаць падставай для адмовы ў разглядзе крытычных скаргаў. Асабліва небяспечна, што заяўніка могуць нават не паве…
👍2
Posted without readable text
❤2
Бяздомныя жывёлы: рашэнне праблемы ці новыя рызыкі жорсткасці? У Беларусі збіраюць прапановы па зменах у правілах палявання. Сярод абмеркаваных падыходаў — больш жорсткае рэгуляванне сітуацыі з сабакамі, якія знаходзяцца без нагляду ўладальнікаў, асабліва ў сельскай мясцовасці. Фармальна гаворка ідзе пра абарону хатняй жывёлы, дзікай фаўны і людзей. Але на фоне выпадкаў масавага адлову і знішчэння безнаглядных саба…
👍3
Posted without readable text
👍2
Змены ў заканадаўстве пра садовыя таварыствы датычацца амаль кожнага, у каго ёсць лецішча ў Беларусі. У відэа коратка разбіраем, што мяняецца для ўладальнікаў участкаў, за што цяпер могуць спытаць больш строга і чаму варта загадзя праверыць дакументы, унёскі і правілы карыстання сваім участкам. Пасля прагляду далучайцеся да апытанкі: што ў новых правілах для садовых таварыстваў вас хвалюе найбольш? 👇
👍2❤1
📣 Адкрыта падача заявак на “Leaders for Change: promoting democracy and human rights at local level” Кангрэс мясцовых і рэгіянальных уладаў Рады Еўропы адкрыў прыём заявак на трэцяе выданне варкшопу “Leaders for Change: promoting democracy and human rights at local level”, які пройдзе 7–9 ліпеня 2026 года ў Страсбургу, Францыя. Праграма прызначаная для прадстаўнікоў і прадстаўніц беларускіх дэмакратычных сіл, грам…
👍2
Вясновы агляд жылфонду: што гэта значыць і як дзейнічаць жыхарам У Беларусі пачаўся вясновы агляд жыллёвага фонду. Гэта не “фармальная праверка”, а момант, калі вырашаецца, што будуць рамантаваць у 2026 годзе — і ці ўвогуле будуць. Што правяраюць: — сістэмы вентыляцыі і дымавыя каналы — стан дахаў, фасадаў, балконаў, уваходных груп — пад’езды і месцы агульнага карыстання — тэхнічныя паверхі і гарышчы (санітарны ста…
👍2
Генпланы без горада: як тэхнічныя праўкі забіраюць у мясцовых жыхароў паўнамоцтвы На Прававым форуме ідзе грамадскае абмеркаванне зменаў у Кодэкс аб архітэктурнай, горадабудаўнічай і будаўнічай дзейнасці. Тэрмін кароткі: з 10 лютага 2026 да 20 лютага 2026. Ключавое ў гэтым праекце не ў дробных тэрмінах, а ў тым, што Міністэрству прапануюць аддаць функцыю заказчыка па распрацоўцы генпланаў. Калі гэта пройдзе, мясцов…
👍3
♻️ Што рабіць, калі кантэйнерная пляцоўка не прыбіраецца ЖКГ Бруд, лісце “падушкай”, жыжа з дажджу і дробнага смецця, слізка і непрыемны пах — а пляцоўку месяцамі ніхто не падмятае? Гэта не “дробязь”, а пытанне бяспекі і санітарыі. Вось практычны алгарытм. Зафіксуйце праблему Зрабіце фота і відэа так, каб было відаць: лісце, бруд, лужыны, смецце вакол кантэйнераў, слізкія месцы, падыходы да кантэйнераў. Дадайце дат…
👍3
🎄 З Раством і Новым годам, шаноўныя калегі! 🎄✨ Дзякуй вам за гэты год. За настойлівасць, салідарнасць і гатоўнасць адстойваць свае двары, вуліцы, гарады і вёскі — нават там, дзе сістэма робіць выгляд, што “нічога не бачыць”. 📌 Вынікі нашай супольнай працы за 2025 год: — падтрымка актывістаў і ініцыятыў з розных рэгіёнаў Беларусі; — кансультацыі і практычныя рэкамендацыі па вырашэнні мясцовых праблем (ЖКГ, добраўпа…
❤3👍1
❓ А як вы лічыце: ці патрэбна Беларусі канкурэнцыя і прыватны бізнэс у пасажырскіх перавозках?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍3
🚐 Зноў чаргі на маршруткі. Зноў Dana Mall. Людзі стаяць і чакаюць — і гэта ўжо стала звыклым для Мінска і прыгарадаў. Пасля публічнай увагі “зверху” праблема знікла… але толькі на месяц. Потым усё вярнулася. Чаму? Бо праблему не вырашылі сістэмна. Праблема маршрутак у Беларусі — не ў пасажырах і не ў надвор’і. Яна ў манаполіі, адсутнасці канкурэнцыі і слабай дэцэнтралізацыі. Прыватнаму бізнесу складана выходзіць …
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rksby2020. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❓ А як вы лічыце: ці патрэбна Беларусі канкурэнцыя і прыватны бізнэс у пасажырскіх перавозках?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🛣 Ці задаволены вы станам дарог у вашым рэгіёне?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🛠️ Ці патрэбна Беларусі сістэмная рэформа ЖКГ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❄️ Ці сутыкаліся вы з тым, што батарэі ледзяныя, а ЖЭС толькі кажа “чакайце”?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
♻️ Ці варта зачыняць смеццеправод у вашым доме?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 945,826 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Regional Group |
|---|---|
| Description | working group of Coordination Council |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КОТОС: мясцовае самакіраванне” (@rksby2020), 415 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rksby2020.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.