Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for WavesVPN | АнтиБС

Channel

WavesVPN | АнтиБС

@rknfcker

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

122subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002361509727
TypeChannel
Username@rknfcker
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rknfcker

Growth

117122119.56 August 2026 — 117 subscribers9 August 2026 — 117 subscribers14 August 2026 — 118 subscribers22 August 2026 — 120 subscribers29 August 2026 — 121 subscribers6 September 2026 — 122 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116–123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 17:38122+1
29 Aug 2026, 07:37121+1
22 Aug 2026, 11:03120+2
14 Aug 2026, 13:35118+1
9 Aug 2026, 05:02117no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:42117first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3437.0%
👌1718.5%
🔥1213.0%
🤝99.78%
❤‍🔥66.52%
🫡55.43%
🎉44.35%
😢22.17%
11.09%
11.09%
👏11.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC38 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

На хапп пришла обнова, которая по традиции может вам сломать полностью весь впн. Если что-то не работает или работает некорректно, удалите хапп и установите через пошаговую установку в боте.

🤝3

7 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC60 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Увидел почему заливает СПУСТЯ 4 МЕСЯЦА🤦‍♂️🤪 Поправил, глянем как завтра будет. Если что напишу скрипт мониторинга с автофиксом

👍3👏1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

проводим диагностику бсов

👌1👍1

6 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC65 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Поднял все протоколы на всех серверах кроме DK XHTTP

🤝3👌1

5 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC89 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Длиннопост №2 Белые списки продолжали тупить хотя почему-то почти никто не жаловался. Проблема была на стороне роутера – он подвисал от нагрузки, как следствие впн у вас залипал. Я его прошил, скинул все настройки и оптимизировал. Надеюсь все будет ок. Все это добила очередная ДДОС атака и массовые баны серваков и подсетей со стороны РКН. Все чинится за 5 минут, но на диагностику уходят часы и дни. Пока найдешь где

👌11

5 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC79 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Готово, обновите сервера

👌3

5 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC76 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

РКН сервер в НЛ вчера забанил. щас включу

😢2

4 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC88 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

DDOS мне все поломал, еле включил. Приношу извинения за неудобства

👍3

4 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC89 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ставлю оборудование. будут перебои

👍21

3 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC101 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Всем привет К сожалению, оптимизация не спасла — бсы подлагивают. оборудование уже в пути.

👍3🤝3👌1

1 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC134 viewsread 9 August 2026

Народ, а вы бсы сегодня юзали? у меня видимо после этого шаманства потребление трафика в 6 раз упало😳

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rknfcker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WavesVPN | АнтиБС” (@rknfcker), 122 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rknfcker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.