Забейте, скоро будет прайм. Надеюсь. Эх, вот бы Елизавета разрешила не пересдавать общество...
custom 54699917416941647895🕊4custom 54719683500682916963

Channel
@rjvliberte_s
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002701521386 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rjvliberte_s |
| Description | ✧˖*°࿐𝔍𝔢 𝔪𝔢 𝔰𝔢𝔫𝔰: 𝔠'𝔢𝔰𝔱 𝔩𝔢 𝔡𝔢𝔟𝔲𝔱 𝔡𝔢 𝔮𝔲𝔢𝔩𝔮𝔲𝔢 𝔠𝔥𝔬𝔰𝔢 𝔡𝔢 𝔭𝔩𝔲𝔰 𝔤𝔯𝔞𝔫𝔡. https://t.me/boost/rjvliberte_s |
| Created | Between 1 May 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rjvliberte_s |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 17 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 17 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
178 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5469991741694164789 | 73 | 41.0% | |
| 🕊 | 60 | 33.7% | |
| custom 5471968350068291696 | 45 | 25.3% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rjvliberte_s. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 May 2026 to 27 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Забейте, скоро будет прайм. Надеюсь. Эх, вот бы Елизавета разрешила не пересдавать общество...
custom 54699917416941647895🕊4custom 54719683500682916963
Я позорница .
🕊7
Черр, это [неразличимая нецензурная брань].
🕊4
Всем привет, ремиссия отменяется, всем пока.
🕊4
Не понос, так золотуха. Не экзамены, так уборка. Где-то с полудня убираюсь у себя в комнате. Мне плохо уже, хвхахахаха. Эхх, вот бы завтра лежать и ничо не делать.. Но завтра тоже дела. Ну это я так, держу в курсе тех, кто ждёт от меня рисуночки или хотя бы ответы в лс. :)) Простите, мои дорогие, я пытаюсь реабилитироваться.
🕊4custom 54699917416941647892custom 54719683500682916962
Котяточки мои, это просто [неразличимая нецензурная брань]. Понятия не имею, рецидив у меня или кратковременный тильт на фоне постоянного сильного стрессика, но пока что я даже не овощ, а спичечный коробок какой-нибудь. Со соре кстати за щп тут, просто держу в курсе, чо где я. Экзамены сданы. По русскому и математике результаты пришли, всё ещё лучше, чем я ожидала. Но вот обществознание и информатика... надежды нет. …
🕊4custom 54699917416941647893custom 54719683500682916962
Дорогие мои, дико извиняюсь, но у меня тут пятилетку за два дня надо осилить......🥹 А ПОТОМ ЕЩЁ ОДНУ ПЯТИЛЕТКУ ЗА НЕДЕЛЮ. Крч каюсь перед всеми, кого игнорю и кому дедлайны проспала.😭 Потерпите моё ужасное поведение ещё дней 10.🙏🏻
custom 54719683500682916967custom 54699917416941647894🕊2
ЕГЭ завтра.☠☠
custom 54699917416941647899custom 54719683500682916963🕊2
Эх, стрим закончился. Во-первых, как и обещала, кривые скетчики, чтобы вы, мои милые художники, не боялись кидать свои шедевры!! Щас расшифрую свои иероглифы, ахаха. 1 фото. Говард: Всем привет... Мы ищем Слендермена... (и я не помню, что там шутили, ха-ха.) Слендер, которому я дорисовала ушко лошади типа: ИГОГО)) Правый нижний угол: [Начало карьеры крутого юбублера] 2 фото. Говардино в шляпино.)) Слева: Вообразите п…
🕊6custom 54699917416941647894custom 54719683500682916964
У моего любимого Говарда был трёхчасовой стрим, в течение которого я чёта наскетчила, кушайте, не обляпайтесь, ахахаха. "Полноценки" будут, от них никуда не деться, потому что на свою голову в коллабы записалась, хе-хе..
custom 54699917416941647897🕊3custom 54719683500682916962
Полноценок нет, но вы держитесь.. Если будут силы, соберу завтра какие-то кривенькие почеркушки, которые были созданы за всё это время. А пока можете взглянуть на добренькую страничку из моего дневника. Мультики скину в комменты, настоятельно рекомендую к просмотру.
custom 54719683500682916965custom 54699917416941647894🕊2
Эээээ я типа вообще не умею работать с акварелью, ок да?
🕊5custom 54699917416941647894custom 54719683500682916962
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rjvliberte_s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 819,321 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝔯𝔢𝔠𝔥𝔢𝔯𝔠𝔥𝔢 𝔡𝔢 𝔰𝔱𝔶𝔩𝔢.₊˚.༄ ೃ -” (@rjvliberte_s), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rjvliberte_s.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.