Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[архив] . 𝗥𝗜𝗭𝗭.𝗵𝘂𝗯

@rizzzprtf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

115subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002293333240
TypeChannel
Username@rizzzprtf
Descriptionfor order: @rizzzk0 archive: @archive_rizzz boost: https://t.me/boost?c=2293333240 start: 2.01.2025
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/rizzzprtf

Growth

1157 August 2026 — 115 subscribers9 August 2026 — 115 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 114–116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 05:46115no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:10115first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
145
Links
43

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

356 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53099160557144078777922.2%
🍓6217.4%
custom 54227166758898406765816.3%
custom 52695127657850115754312.1%
custom 54228520747338486793810.7%
🍌318.71%
custom 5309824366752573298257.02%
custom 5197662098976427369113.09%
custom 518819561739387877751.40%
custom 529204935254032129241.12%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 356reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2025 to 21 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rizzzprtf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2025 to 21 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 May 2026, 22:56 UTC43 viewsread 9 August 2026

пр кд чд кто жив, мне скучно че у вас тут происходит, рассказывайте, зачем сидите тут до сих пор

13 Nov 2025, 21:14 UTC216 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

пр кто жив, там работы новые крутые🌟

🍓6

13 Oct 2025, 10:48 UTC289 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

пре, пока что так, кто хочет следить - заходим. может изменю немного со временем, в общем да https://t.me/rizzzdsgn https://t.me/rizzzdsgn

🍓1

11 Oct 2025, 18:23 UTC258 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

в оообщем, что я думаю мооожет быть создам другой тгк и будет все с нуля, без участия в жизни км и всего этого + будут работы с колледжа, еще может какие-нибудь штучки ваще рандом, эдиты, чисто как свой уголок вне щп либо же чисто порт новый че думаете? варианты пойти нахуй не принимаются, потому что мне скучно

custom 54228520747338486796custom 54227166758898406763custom 53098243667525732982custom 53099160557144078771

11 Oct 2025, 15:24 UTC228 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

зачем вы на это чудовище подписаны до сих пор

custom 53099160557144078774

11 Oct 2025, 15:23 UTC222 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

превет медвед молодежь вы бы следили за мной, если бы я создала тгк чисто для работ? (не только дизайн)

custom 53098243667525732987

11 Sept 2025, 19:48 UTC287 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

соскучилась по вам, но дизайнить не планирую больше как у вас первые две недели учебы прошли?

🍓6

11 Sept 2025, 19:45 UTC275 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

пр, че вы школа? поставите лайк? я старалась, хочу популярности https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8SjnTa5/

custom 53099160557144078774

12 Aug 2025, 15:12 UTC435 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

может быть еще увидимся, если учеба и желание позволят

custom 53099160557144078778custom 53098243667525732983

12 Aug 2025, 15:10 UTC441 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

а ну союзы со всеми разорваны, да

custom 53099160557144078772

12 Aug 2025, 15:09 UTC462 views34 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ризз.хаб – В С Е! пр, я не знаю, что обычно пишут в таких постах. после долгих размышлений об этом, я все таки пришла к решению, что для меня будет лучше закрыть порт🙂 ни актива от меня, ни актива от вас на данный момент тут почти нет. желание что-то вести, делать и наблюдать за км пропало хочу выразить благодарность всем тем, кто хоть как-то следил за мной и поддерживал я больше не знаю, что тут писать. заказы

custom 530991605571440787719custom 51976620989764273697custom 54227166758898406765🍓1custom 51881956173938787771custom 53098243667525732981

12 Aug 2025, 15:06 UTC347 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🍓1custom 53098243667525732981custom 54227166758898406761

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rizzzprtf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 910,750 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[архив] . 𝗥𝗜𝗭𝗭.𝗵𝘂𝗯” (@rizzzprtf), 115 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rizzzprtf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.