Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Котеночные отзывы "Рыжий кот"

Channel

Котеночные отзывы "Рыжий кот"

@rizhii_kot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

51subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002960985674
TypeChannel
Username@rizhii_kot
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rizhii_kot

Growth

4151468 August 2026 — 42 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42 subscribers15 August 2026 — 41 subscribers23 August 2026 — 51 subscribers8 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–53 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 11:1551+10
15 Aug 2026, 20:1841-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:3142no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:1942first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
660.0%
🍓220.0%
🔥110.0%
🥰110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jun 2026, 19:42 UTC70 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

вот такая сладость сегодня собралась спасибшки всем за веселое времяпровождения и яркие воспоминания:33

2🍓2

28 Jun 2026, 18:55 UTC63 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vhuyng23Photo

Если так подводить, огромное спасибо за мероприятие столь масштабное. Было приятно увидеть многих уже знакомых лиц не только с меняльника к примеру, но с маркета. К сожалению уже дома табличка наша сломалась окончательно, но к следующему разу, она будет в тысячу раз лучше. Ещё раз спасибо за всё!!!❤

1🥰1

28 Jun 2026, 18:55 UTC58 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vhuyng23Photo

Отзыв к меняльнику "Рыжий кот" в колабе с "Хижина шакала" Это просто очешуенно. Настолько масштабное мероприятие которое прошло довольно так и спокойно, тоесть без особых драк и прочего, RED N.E.E.T, что следили за нами очень сильно постарались, чтобы все прошло гладко. Так же было неожиданно притащить домой такой лут и отдельное спасибо Тори и Юне, без них думаю ничего бы и не получилось по сути. Вновь я нашла для с

3🔥1

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @rizhii_kot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Котеночные отзывы "Рыжий кот"” (@rizhii_kot), 51 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rizhii_kot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.