Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ri-___-taaa

@ritto4ka204

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

87subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002638298431
TypeChannel
Username@ritto4ka204
DescriptionКак показывает статистика 60% людей подписанных на этот канал меркантильные твари которые хотят охмурить молодого самца
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ritto4ka204

Growth

876 August 2026 — 87 subscribers9 August 2026 — 87 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 86–88 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 15:4787no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:0287first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
112.7%
avg views ÷ 87 subscribers
Avg views / post
98.1
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held15 (12 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total1,275
Reactions total301
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
144
Videos
1
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

358 reactions across 15 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53052908870377276346016.8%
💘4011.2%
custom 53750906811926589903610.1%
🔥359.78%
custom 5217468770158680686256.98%
256.98%
custom 5305349835463864761226.15%
custom 5461099969685516192195.31%
❤‍🔥195.31%
custom 5339183152575297440143.91%
custom 6037448958349938024143.91%
custom 5357186452889284781133.63%
custom 5230992415287959575102.79%
custom 5341346845429865665102.79%
🍓51.40%
🦄51.40%
🎉20.559%
🌚10.279%
👌10.279%
😇10.279%
1 further kind10.279%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 358reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ritto4ka204. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC38 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Готовьтесь рисую дяденьку с климаксом надеюсь скоро закончу и подрублю вам фэккалаб⚠️❗☣️

custom 52174687701586806869custom 52309924152879595756custom 53571864528892847816

Signed Ритаа

1 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC54 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кто хочет калаб со мной Фрерардов или Дрейков по этому референсу??🌚🌚🌚🌚не стесняйтесь🌚🌚🌚🌚 Если хотите могу сделать фейк калабу...🌚🌚🌚🌚

custom 546109996968551619213custom 53571864528892847817

Signed Ритаа

30 Jul 2026, 22:25 UTC77 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

возможно когда ибудь я начну придумывать своим персонажам лор а не просто рисоать ихх🐈🐈

custom 521746877015868068614custom 54610999696855161926💘5custom 52309924152879595752

Signed Ритаа

29 Jul 2026, 20:50 UTC104 views40 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А вы знали что МАРИЙКА67 ахуенно рисует Френка Айеро фурри!!!! 🌩🌩🌩

custom 603744895834993802414custom 530529088703772763410🔥8🍓4custom 52174687701586806862custom 52309924152879595752

Signed Ритаа

29 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC95 views33 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Потихоньку возвращаюсь в нормальное состояние, рисую Фрерардов с Маришкой Учиха Все ещё пиздец как больно даже ходить((((

custom 537509068119265899013❤‍🔥9🔥8custom 53052908870377276343

Signed Ритаа

22 Jul 2026, 22:22 UTC131 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Блин!! Тут так комфортно, мне нравиться, в этой больнице что я не хочу домой уезжать если честно....но тут сутки 7к стоят это единственное что меня останавливает от продления...(Я просто за свои делаю, а мне ещё потом на поддтяжку брекетов) А зарплаты у меня не будет кароче как минимум ещё месяца два из за увольнения и плюсом ещё минус 100к будет из за того что я подписала ебаную хуйню на работе(я думала если честно

11❤‍🔥4🔥3🎉1

Signed Ритаа

22 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC113 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кстати....все мне сделали....лежу....пержу.....в ЧУЛОЧКАХ ЭТО УЖАС я аниме

custom 537509068119265899011custom 53052908870377276346🔥32

Signed Ритаа

22 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC109 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ОН НЕ МОЙ ПАРЕНЬ УПАСИ БОЖЕ

custom 53750906811926589905🔥1

Signed Ритаа

22 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC106 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Aisty_chanPhoto

Мне искренне лень, любимый парень Риты джейкус❤️❤️

custom 53750906811926589907🔥2

Signed Ритаа

21 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC104 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Рисую для Саги фембойчика ее Вроде пол ааетьсч неплохо я кстати рисую забором мне очень нравиться текстура его Завтра еду на операцию очень волнуюсь вставать в шесть утра одевать чулочки 🌚❤️ммм всегда мечтала

custom 530534983546386476110💘4🔥31🌚1😇1🙏1

Signed Ритаа

21 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC98 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Чижик пыжик осеменитель

custom 530534983546386476112🔥6🦄5💘1

Signed Ритаа

17 Jul 2026, 18:41 UTC129 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤥 возбуждат вас?

💘14custom 53052908870377276348custom 53391831525752974408👌1

Signed Ритаа

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ritto4ka204. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 154,883 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ri-___-taaa” (@ritto4ka204), 87 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ritto4ka204.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.