Channel
@riskmanagement
On this record: Previous handles · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
646subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001008294152 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @riskmanagement |
| Created | 26 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/riskmanagement |
Recorded in 2019 as “كانال پيشگيري و كاهش ريسك سوانح” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 646 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 647 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 647 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 19 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (19 February 2026 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 628 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
10 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💔 | 6 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
آتشسوزی در زیرساخت های واقعی کشور - شیراز دو تصویر اول منتشر شده در سایر منابع سایر تصاویر دریافتی از شهروندان، سهشنبه ۳۰ تیر گویا تصاویر بالا دو نقطه مختلف شیراز رو نشون میدن: کوه دراک و کوه نزدیک دروازه قرآن
سیاستمدارها به جنگ نمیروند، تعدادشان کم است و طول عمرهای بلندی دارند؛ اما سربازها، سربازها... داستانهای کوتاه غمانگیزند... دیالوگ از فیلم کمنظیر ۱۹۱۷
استخدام کارشناس روانشناسی/مددکاری (پایگاه خدمات اجتماعی - بنیاد نیکوکاری طاهر) پایگاه خدمات اجتماعی زیر نظر بنیاد خیریه طاهر در شرق تهران، جهت تکمیل کادر تخصصی خود از خانمهای متعهد و توانمند دعوت به همکاری مینماید: شرایط و مهارتها: • مدرک تحصیلی: کارشناسی روانشناسی یا مددکاری اجتماعی • مسلط به کامپیوتر(آفیس) و آشنایی با هوش مصنوعی (جهت گزارشنویسی و امور اداری) • دارای روابط عمومی بالا، فعال و پرانرژی • وضعیت تاه…
چه میشد اگر آن نگار ما، ایران را نوازش میکرد؟ گویی هیچ سرزمینی در جهان، بیش از ایران به نوازش نیاز ندارد. ایران، شبیه سالخوردهای است که غبار روزگار بر چهره اش نشسته و تمام سختیهای جهان را صبورانه تاب آورده است. کاش کسی میآمد و با مهربانی، خستگی این سالها را از تنش میگرفت؛ تا دوباره بتواند بار سنگین ایام و این دنیای نامهربان را بر دوش بکشد. گویی تمام غمهای جهان، بر شانههای این کشور زیبا نشسته است. #پاینده_ای…
📢🚩 اگر شرایط جنگی یا بحران پیش آمد، آماده باشید ⚠️ این مطالب فقط برای آمادگی احتیاطی هست. 🏠 ایمنسازی خانه • روی شیشهها با چسب پهن به شکل ضربدری (X) چسب بزنید. • پرده ضخیم یا پتو پشت پنجره کمک میکند خردهشیشه پخش نشود. 💰 پول نقد • مقداری پول نقد خرد برای چند روز داشته باشید (در صورت قطعی کارتخوان یا اینترنت). 🥫 ذخیره خوراکی (حداقل برای ۷ روز) • کنسرو، برنج، ماکارونی • نان خشک یا بیسکویت • خرما و تنقلات خشک • آب…
❤1
جنایتکاران و تروریست ها به هیچ کس رحم نداشتند لحظه ای که میسوزیم اما .... لحظه اطلاع رسانی شهادت جاویدنام فاطمه سلطانی به فرزند خردسالش💔 لحظه ای که هر انسانی را تا بن استخوان میسوزاند پ.ن: همیشه می گفتیم که در هر حادثه ای وقتی جانی گرفته میشود فقط یک زندگی نیست که از دست میرود بلکه آرزوهای بسیاری نابود میشود و هیچ چیزی قابل جبران نیست. قطار سمنان کشته داد گفتند نگران نباشید بیمه بودند، معدن طبس فروریخت گفتن رییس …
💔6❤1
🌙 رمضان، موسم لبخندهای دوباره در روزهایی که بوی ماه خدا میپیچه در دل کوچهها... فراموش نکنیم خانوادههایی رو که سفرهشون خالیتر از آرزوهاشونه، و کودکانی که خانه هایشان دل های ماست و دلشون فقط یه «لبخند گرم» میخواد 💛 این رمضان، با دستان مهربون شما میخوایم کنارشون باشیم؛ برای “تهیه سبدهای افطاری، پوشاک، و هدایا برای کودکان و خانوادههای بیبضاعت”🌾 🤲 “هر کمک کوچک شما، دل بزرگی رو شاد میکنه.” و ما با احترام، “تصو…
برای خانواده هاتون بفرستید اینو… وسایل خیلی ضرورییکه هر خانواده باید برای روزهای آتی که پیش رو داریم داشته باشه #همه_باهم_به_ایران_فکر_کنیم
🕊1😱1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @riskmanagement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 433,338 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كانال مدیریت ریسک” (@riskmanagement), 646 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/riskmanagement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.